schotts Profile Banner
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„ Profile
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„

@schotts

Followers
29K
Following
291K
Statuses
147K

Constitutional Patriot. Retired Army. Recovering Investment Banker. Colorado native. No DMs Please. Pronouns: ฮœฮฟฮปฯŽฮฝ ฮปฮฑฮฒฮญ.

Colorado
Joined March 2009
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
13 days
#copolitics #coleg #2A @GovofCO @jaredpolis @Sully_720 @SenRodPelton Democrats in the #Colorado legislature have introduced the most draconian, overreaching, unconstitutional gun bill in U.S. history. Yes, U.S. history. While it rivals the DC handgun ban that was overturned with the SCOTUS Heller decision, SB25-003 will ban nearly every semi auto rifle and shotgun that take detachable magazines and some pistols. It is worse than the DC handgun ban. There are a number of compelling reasons why SB25-003 represents legislative malpractice and why it should be rejected outright. I will share them on this thread. While this analysis is detailed, it reflects thorough research and careful consideration of the bill's implications. Feel free to share, use the content to write your state legislators, share with committee members, or use in testimony.
29
169
554
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
2 minutes
RT @justice_Tyr22: Fuck me๐Ÿ™„
Tweet media one
0
11
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
5 minutes
RT @jeffhunt: Here's the thing, Rep. It's 2025. The American people have been giving aid for over 60 years. Time for these countries to figโ€ฆ
0
7
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
16 minutes
RT @RepRyanArmagost: @schotts @YZokaie My responseโ€ฆ
0
1
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
17 minutes
RT @cbiemiller: @joshlax21 @GovtsTheProblem No you leave. Colorado is only as it is because of dumbshits who fled their blue states, but laโ€ฆ
0
1
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
18 minutes
You seem really upset that @GovtsTheProblem points out problems in Colorado. If the account is so miserable, why are you spending your time reading their posts? Maybe try making an actual argument. Just a thought.
@joshlax21
Josh Melton
23 hours
@GovtsTheProblem Your account is the biggest horse ๐Ÿ’ฉ account out thereโ€ฆ Go live in a red state since you hate it here so much seriously you and your account are miserable
0
0
4
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
24 minutes
RT @GovtsTheProblem: Colorado Democrats are trying to force grocery stores to sell products at a loss with a communist price control bill.โ€ฆ
0
326
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
26 minutes
RT @elonmusk: To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following: - Require that all outgoiโ€ฆ
0
71K
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
27 minutes
RT @FreeStateColor1: Violent criminals are being targeted for deportation... "Over the last four years, they weren't really able to do theโ€ฆ
0
13
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
29 minutes
RT @kyle_snark: NEW: Local NGO and The People's House non-profit consulting and lobbying founder Kayla Q(anon?) reacts to the possibility oโ€ฆ
0
2
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
30 minutes
RT @Rothmus: Theyโ€™re thieves.
Tweet media one
0
3K
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
32 minutes
So far, the only argument Iโ€™ve seen from #coleg democrats that SB25-003 is constitutional is the age old โ€œyou canโ€™t yell fire in a crowded theaterโ€. Iโ€™ll debunk that and explain why they need to provide arguments that SB25-003 is constitutional. #copolitics The โ€œcanโ€™t yell fire in a theaterโ€ clichรฉ is a complete misinterpretation of the law. The phrase comes from Schenck v. United States (1919), a case that was later overturned. The current legal standard for restricting speech, or any constitutional right, is strict scrutiny, meaning the government must prove a compelling interest and that the restriction is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest without unnecessarily infringing on rights. SB25-003 needs to be defended under actual constitutional scrutiny, not a debunked soundbite. If SB25-003 sponsors believe itโ€™s constitutional, they need to cite relevant case law and explain how it survives the necessary legal tests, particularly under the Bruen framework, not rely on a misquoted century-old ruling.
0
4
15
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
40 minutes
RT @MissyMurdrem2: @alanfranklin @EvanKruegel Phil Weiser would get to make changes to the bill (expanding his power.) He would definitelyโ€ฆ
0
1
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
1 hour
@eRightoff @KaylaQFrawley @MannyRutinel You have 19 followers after 12 years on this platform.
0
0
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
1 hour
RT @KBBColorado: You clearly donโ€™t know how illegal immigration works. Go try being a military vet and a police officer like Gabe before yโ€ฆ
0
9
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
1 hour
RT @DaniJurinsky: So let me get this straight... Coloradoans have to "opt in" to receive our TABOR refund. Essentially, our own money backโ€ฆ
0
217
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
1 hour
They will never stop invoking Russia to smear. So 2016.
@TristanSnell
Tristan Snell
14 hours
The richest man on earth, Elon Musk is trying to kill a department, USAID, that helps the poorest people on earth Because USAID has been investigating Musk and his Starlink company โ€” and their ties to Vladimir Putin and Russia THAT is why Musk is attacking USAID
0
2
9
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
2 hours
The hypocrisy of this guy is astonishing #copolitics
@RepJasonCrow
Rep. Jason Crow
2 hours
Fact = avoiding needless wars & stop saber rattling will make people harder to kill.
2
3
23
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
6 hours
RT @katiespierce: @schotts Itโ€™s astonishing how many bills are proposed and even passed despite being, in whole or in part, contrary to exiโ€ฆ
0
3
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
6 hours
0
0
0
@schotts
schotts ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐ŸŽ„
6 hours
@metallwerks Iโ€™m not sure. You may need to look at the full bill/law.
0
0
0