![Mark Wildblood Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1736569350247546881/h4TMnn3G_x96.jpg)
Mark Wildblood
@TeatsVinegar
Followers
205
Following
5K
Statuses
4K
Joined October 2021
@stugoo17 Keeps coming back to a mindset that knows complacency doesn't threaten accountability. Why encourage "screw ups" whether malicious or incompetent? Privilege is a bitch with some people. No wonder Ron was befuddled. His belief in doing right was questioned from highest level
0
0
2
@KemiBadenoch @Conservatives Sustainable population should be an established and maintained target before immigration can be addressed as an attributed calculation. From self serve supermarkets to online decimation of small business self employed. What's the plan to make sure everyone can actually earn?
0
0
0
Privileged roles in govt tempts abuse of that privilege, without accountability. 200 GLO still awaiting fair financial compensation. Isn't that circa £1.5 million per head; abuse of taxpayers money spent on legal fees? To hide lies? I'm using selective narrative? Do they?
#PostOfficeScandal #PostOfficeInquiry #StateCoverUp The email below shows that the Single Shareholder/BEIS was so acutely aware of the significance of the SWIFT REVIEW that it held a high level (UNMINUTED) meeting in April 2020 to discuss the reporting of the Review to @LNevilleRolfe back in 2016. Yet BEIS’s evidence to the Select Committee Inquiry published in May 2020, gave no hint of this incendiary, hitherto buried document. Instead BEIS aligned itself with POL’s heavily sanitised mantra, claiming the SWIFT REVIEW found ‘no systemic problem with the Horizon system’. Such an incomplete, misleading interpretation can only have been intended to throw the Committee off the scent of the SWIFT REVIEW. The BIG question is what were the inhumane motivations of the Single Shareholder, @biztradegovuk & UKGI in keeping the true findings of the SWIFT REVIEW secret from the SPMs & their legal teams pre-the 2021 Court of Appeal Hearings. ❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓ @liambyrnemp @CommonsBTC @ElCShaikh @PaulMar72224296 @ @MoJGovUK @zoenora6 @politicshome @UKHouseofLords @DavidDavisMP @premnsikka @CommonsJustice @andyverity @BBCEmmaSimpson @TheHouseMag @TimBushLondon @StephenBouvierX
0
1
5
@Karlfl It would probably also be the same conundrum of how much was and is still yet to be spent on post office legal costs defending the indefensible. That's probably circa £300 mil so far?
0
0
1
@TheOldMan2003 @LBC @NickFerrariLBC @BorisJohnson I'd give it up. You're risking looking as daft as he did in that interview.
0
0
4
@stugoo17 @CWUnews @CWUPostmaster @CWUPostmasters @NFSP_UK @voiceofthePM @WHSmith The irony of transitioning to "online" to offer services. Slash the branch/ human led face to face community service and find out that your own system points fingers at the few people who thought they were on an easy dictatorial wicket. Dumb asses.
0
3
5
@GaryMcleft @NoMaloneZone @ActivePatriotUK Got it. The idiots that wanted it are not supporters of Yvette Cooper. pigeon holing Is really stupid isn't it? Thanks for clarifying .
2
0
0
@hs20229 @Birax @Keir_Starmer @POTUS What on earth is the point you are trying to make by posting that?
2
0
0
@noseybs @jarrowmarching6 @AndyPlumb4 @DaveAtherton20 So it's ok to imply so as to incite in your opinion?
0
0
0
@duncanoe2 @louise_today @sparry951 @RachelCurtis82 @RachelReevesMP Misleading. Perhaps this for context
0
0
0
@louise_today @Tuttlebees @RachelCurtis82 @GreenTrolled @RachelReevesMP Probably more related to this than a newspaper article
0
0
0
@FloraClairePage Sometimes what's right , happens. You're awesome. Congratulations but most importantly, Thank you.
0
0
4
@aledgwynj @BlairRR16985188 @DanielJHannan Ha. Call me old fashioned. Bit feral on here at times , before the event.
1
0
0