![Michael Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1871990452422946816/j975y4jV_x96.jpg)
Michael
@StayRight239
Followers
561
Following
4K
Statuses
22K
Roman Catholic ✝️🇻🇦
Pennsylvania, USA
Joined December 2017
@rightwingnutrs When you speak of consequences only, instead of using discussion of the consequences as a bridge to sound moral reasoning, people just try to find ways around the consequences. It’s why we have birth control and PrEP.
0
0
0
@pissmarck They’ve already gotten to the point where they’re reusing plot lines from older episodes and just slapping it on a background of modern-day technology and problems.
0
0
0
@Sanctvspavlvs @WalmartThomist I can think of three reasons. 1. It’s an unnatural act. 2. It’s only ordered to pleasure, which makes it gravely immoral. 3. It involves a very real risk of ingesting urine or semen, which is also unnatural.
1
0
0
@MetzUAC1530 They don’t even do that according to the fake definition of “marriage” they made up. Most homos would much rather go to sodomy orgies and create brand new STIs than even do a pale imitation of true married life.
0
0
5
@ProvisionistP Based on the usual definition of libertarian freedom (where the will is free from the efficient causality of all other creatures), I accept it. It is only when we say that this means man’s actions are free from the efficient causality of God that we run into a problem.
0
0
0
@ssavage0914 @Antunes1 @TattedIrishGuy You guys are the Democrats in all the ways that matter. You both want homos and transgenders as thought leaders.
0
1
3
@ASFleischman @bendreyfuss I don’t care how thoughtful the announcement that you’re a sexually perverted psychopath is.
0
0
0
@MrFluferMufin @smashbaals Woman made from man without carnal union, man made from woman without carnal union - that’s nothing alike to you?
1
0
1
@ada_lluch We will never allow you to pretend homosexuality is based now. Just hope you know that.
0
0
0
This man should be jailed. What a disgraceful specimen, not only abusing his wife and daughters but spitting in the face of his Creator. Pray for his repentance.
Quick update: my name has changed from Brian Riedl to Jessica Riedl. Fear not, my focus on rapid-response (center-right) economic policy and cool budget charts won’t change. Link below will be my only comment and explanation on this. Back to policy!
0
0
7
@Thomisticae I voted yes. The major difficulty I see with this view is that original sin is contrasted with original justice, and no person but the second Adam (Our Lord Jesus Christ) could have restored that to us. But I still believe the covenant applies to all of Adam��s progeny.
0
0
1
@CristusVictor @Jaykayphx Someone else pointed out that it appears he’s trying to make himself look like his oldest daughter. He should be jailed.
1
0
5
@CW23CW @Jaykayphx A “conservative” economist who works for the Manhattan Institute, which opposed transgenderism until yesterday.
3
0
43
@iam_shwa @WalmartThomist @MinionThomist @PoisonDartG3 @Wictor2501 @NickCatholic1 Where is the line drawn on what the married can do, if not in the distinction between a vas debitum and vas indebitum? What if they want to urinate on each other for “foreplay”, or maybe punch each other in the face as hard as they can?
2
0
2