![Ethical Skeptic ☀ Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1603934959911182337/0EdD3s8h_x96.jpg)
Ethical Skeptic ☀
@EthicalSkeptic
Followers
310K
Following
85K
Statuses
51K
Managing Partner/CEO Corporate & National Strategy Systems Science & Engineering US Naval Officer (ONI) ENTX Ponerologist Author of ECDO Earth Cataclysm Theory
USA
Joined August 2014
@9thousandbytes I respect your decision to do it the way you want. This is one of those things where grey areas of style should not be enforced as law. Focus on the point the person is making. That is the pinnacle of style.
1
0
7
@DeanLogic The stone commemorates an event 16,800 years ago. That is not the same thing as GT being built.
0
0
5
@jarue369 @Truth4All777 @SomethinSlix Part of the requirement of one being a 'God', is that nothing can have preexisted you. You must erase any evidence of a past prior to your reign.
0
0
6
Göbekli Tepe's Pillar 43, or the "Vulture Stone," may depict the northern sky as it appeared around 14,800 BCE, encoding advanced astronomical knowledge. The carvings align with constellations like Cygnus and may reference cataclysmic events, such as polar shifts or auroras. Symbols like "handbags" likely represent nearby hills used as shelters during crises. Due to Earth's axial precession (~26,000 years), this alignment could recur around 11,200 CE. This interpretation challenges mainstream archaeology, suggesting Göbekli Tepe was built by advanced agrarian societies, not hunter-gatherers, and served as a cultural and astronomical repository.
0
0
3
ChatGPT advised me not to... "No, "internet" should not be capitalized in this context. The term "Internet" was historically capitalized when referring to the global network, but modern style guides (such as AP and Chicago Manual of Style) generally recommend using lowercase "internet" unless it is part of a proper noun or title. Since you're referring to various internet pundits in a general sense (people who discuss topics online), lowercase is appropriate here."
2
0
17
@Empireenjoyer11 Yes, in other words - post it on X, with an enticing one line tease. Read through my timeline. I have literally hundreds of these.
0
0
3
@SomethinSlix No. Someone just insisted upon the answer they wanted to hear. If it was buried, that places the onus upon the question of asking, 'why?' You learn fast in archaeology that science is about answers, not questions.
3
0
27
@Steph_iD I just looked, and he did not contend this at all. This is just money-making claptrap about literally everything. No mention of three specific tepes - only that the hill of Gobekli form a bull shape ...which is it, bull. Blocked for lying, and trying to harm.
0
1
4
@Empireenjoyer11 If this were true, no one would have ever had a non-fiction best-selling book.
1
0
4
@MysticPrickly Non-human intelligences (not extra-terrestrial) are part of our epistemology now. One cannot divorce that construct from history. Of course that does not pertain to everything, but if we leave it out, we likely explain nothing - in a solipsistic fairy tale.
5
3
92
@WHousehusband @creativebasic Read the image. It explains. There are two equilibria, not just the LLVP-induced angular momentum one.
0
0
0