Willy Frick
@willyhfrick
Followers
4K
Following
9K
Statuses
4K
Cardiology fellow. Incoming EP. Medical educator. Also on the other network (BS) with the same handle.
St. Louis, MO
Joined February 2011
@Patrick49012564 @DavidLBrownMD Stent is focal treatment for systemic disease (atherosclerosis). Stents have complications, restenosis, and may accelerate atherosclerosis in other areas. Imagine widely metastatic cancer and you just cut out a single conspicuous lesion.
2
0
4
@Ben_Kelemen @ZSiudak @pmenon504 @cardiojaydoc02 And as you say, even if true, decreasing spontaneous MI at the cost of PPMI is a pyrrhic victory
0
0
0
@altcap Decades of randomized data show no survival benefit to stenting stable coronary disease.
0
0
21
@tvailas25 @altcap False negative and false positives. CAC is not a good test, and has never been shown to improve outcomes.
0
0
0
@ZacharieCantu @RhythmHelp @altcap COURAGE, BARI-2D, ISCHEMIA, REVIVED-BCIS-2. All landmark trials showing no benefit to stents vs medical management for stable disease.
0
0
2
@IhabFathiSulima Is there a prior ECG. Iām not convinced the ECG changes are acute. It could be, but it looks like LVH to me.
0
0
0
@EM_RESUS Unfortunately none were obtained. I routinely trend ECGs post PCI but I find most people are not interested.
0
0
4
@lila_enis Knowing this, you can make out South African Flag sign. Hyperacute T waves in I/aVL/V2 with reciprocal change in III. Prior for comparison
0
1
5
@suricardio @ecgandrhythmRoe @baramink @CardioBeat_ @chi_no_usagi @DrRajeshG1 @DrRazi4 @ecgotaku @FibrilloFlutter Respectfully, it is not a STEMI. It is an NSTEMI. Which two contiguous leads would you say satisfy criteria? A good example for the failings of the STEMI paradigm and reason to embrace the OMI paradigm.
1
1
6
@sohrab1104 @ecgandrhythmRoe @Ecgloverr @The_Nanashi_O @DrRazi4 I would want to see a longer rhythm strip. This might be 2:1 AV conduction but the PR interval seems to vary slightly suggesting the possibility of complete heart block.
3
0
3
@jeffrey_vinocur FWIW I checked with the echocardiographer since it says "mildly reduced" but LVEF 57%. Response was that it was a typo and "it looked overall pretty normal."
0
0
1