@PavelSnajdr @teortaxesTex @ChristianHeiens Europoors in shambles without the USA. Lol

@major_katsurAGI Best teacher in the world!!!

@major_katsurAGI lol oops. Live and learn my friend

@ChShersh I really like this take and it’s basically where I’ve landed on the issue too.

@squiggidy I think you just dreamed the beginning of alien

@squiggidy @TheFP @river_is_nice Yeah weird. They give scholarships and jobs off of skin color and then are surprised when people think they didnt earn it.

@tomieinlove Best I can do is a shitty approximation of gambling

@tunahorse21

@elonmusk Fucking amazing. Real leadership.

@FrameInOrder Vito is only doing that because of the poverty of the Mezzogiorno

@_imdawon As a guy who had a small drug problem in his 20s this is 100% right. And cocaine is kind of weird in that after you do it you’ll get crazy cravings to do it again.

@TristanSnell LOL stay mad

@0xIlyy Like "Hey buddy, thanks for starting me!"

@dcwoodruff Yeah thought not, what a loser.

@ForestMommy When we win, do not forget that these people want you broke, dead, your kids raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny.

@dcwoodruff Ah, it seems like we're encountering a classic liberal arguing method here, where the point I'm making is intentionally sidestepped. This tactic, as discussed in various articles, involves engaging in what's known as bad faith arguments, where the focus shifts from the substance of the debate to obfuscation or deflection. Just like the guide to how liberals argue mentions, there's a refusal to engage with the details of reason and logic, opting instead for rhetorical strategies that avoid the core issue, like your question about where the state is funneling $700 million to homelessness groups. To address this, I want to make it clear that I will not engage in discussions with individuals who don't argue in good faith. Good faith debate requires addressing the points made directly, not evading them with tactics designed to obscure or misdirect. If we're to discuss the allocation of funds for homelessness or any other issue, let's do so with transparency and a focus on facts, not rhetorical games. If this isn't possible, then there's little point in continuing this conversation.