Matthew Segal Profile Banner
Matthew Segal Profile
Matthew Segal

@segalmr

Followers
18,948
Following
1,940
Media
394
Statuses
7,263

Civil Rights Lawyer | Personal Views | Not Legal Advice | segalmr . bsky . social

Mass.
Joined April 2015
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
Pinned Tweet
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
Some news: After 11+ years, today is my last day as Legal Director of the ACLU of Massachusetts. I will soon join the national ACLU as an attorney focusing on advocacy in state supreme courts.
80
40
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
how embarrassing for Massachusetts residents that someone figured out how to prove we’re actually nice
756
3K
37K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
The law he signed doesn’t mention drag performances, likely because lawyers thought they could insulate the law from constitutional challenge by not admitting its true aim. Then the Governor just… tweeted it out.
Tweet media one
175
2K
14K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
In my legal practice it has not occurred to me to urge someone to become a fugitive but then again I don’t have “Esq” in my Twitter bio so what do I know
Tweet media one
460
1K
8K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 months
If someone had told you on Jan 7, 2021, that this is where we'd be in July 2024, you'd have said it was a spectacular failure by the legal system. And you'd have been right.
122
827
6K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
A justice who thinks a policy can go from *constitutional* to *unconstitutional* in 25yrs believes in a living constitution, whether they admit it or not.
123
1K
6K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 months
“Where do you get your state supreme court news?” “Oh, the usual: court web sites, noted scholars, and of course THUGGERDAILY”
@ThuggerDaily
THUGGERDAILY ひ
3 months
UPDATE: Brian Steel has been granted Supersedeas Bond by the Supreme Court of Georgia. He will not need to go to jail, while waiting for his Contempt order to be appealed.
Tweet media one
147
1K
8K
23
385
4K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
It took me a while to realize this, but sometimes when public officials go out of their way to complain about a certain type of advocacy, what they are revealing is that this is the type of advoacy that has the best chance of altering their conduct.
21
566
3K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
Korematsu, except the Executive Branch tries to end internment and the Judicial Branch says no you have to do it.
29
703
3K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
wonder how the NFL would react if it turned out a billionaire fan of a specific football team had been flying an official around to vacation with other fans of that team
78
545
3K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Absurd to say it's a decision between "a woman, her doctor, and local political leaders" because that leaves out all the prosecutors and bounty-hunter plaintiffs who also get to weigh in.
47
727
3K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: qualified immunity does not protect an officer who inflicts deadly force on a person who is only a threat to himself.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
8
365
2K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 months
The second Trump era will go extremely badly if people are led to believe, in advance, that certain kinds of homicides will result in pardons.
@tplohetski
Tony Plohetski
3 months
BREAKING: The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles has recommended a full pardon to Daniel Perry, convicted in the death of protester Garrett Foster, which Gov. Greg Abbott has previously said he will sign.
140
204
562
56
617
2K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 months
There's a saying in appellate practice that if someone claims to have, like, 7 appellate issues then they actually have none. Well, I think we found the guy who actually might have 7 issues.
9
97
2K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
4 months
Law School Exam Issue-Spotter: A defendant who is subject to a gag order invites surrogates, who may in the future seek jobs from him, to stand outside the courthouse and promote jury nullification. Who if anyone has liability, and for what?
63
430
2K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
just amazing that the man tried to overturn a presidential election and so far his harshest punishment is a temporary loss of a social media account
44
502
2K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
6 months
“We literally fought a civil war for this.” “But did you pass a ✨statute✨”
21
340
2K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
A federal right that exists at the discretion of the states is not, in fact, a federal right.
8
293
2K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
My take on the lawyer outfit debate is that the legal system would do well to devote less attention to commanding respect through its outfits and more attention to earning respect through its outcomes.
11
196
2K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
Not great that it takes 60 Senators to create voting rights but only 5 Justices to nullify them.
3
228
2K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
11 months
To put it mildly: the court's apparent disdain for what drag shows express undermines the court's claim that drag shows don't express anything.
@mjs_DC
Mark Joseph Stern
11 months
Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk refuses to grant relief to Texas college students who may be punished for hosting a drag show. His condemns drag as “vulgar and lewd” “sexualized conduct” that harms children and is likely unprotected by the First Amendment.
319
757
2K
14
253
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
LAWYER: Have you posted anything on social media that could affect the judge's decision on pretrial detention? CLIENT: I have an account but it's no big deal. THE ACCOUNT:
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
47
313
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
4 months
IDAHO: if a doctor says an abortion is warranted to protect a woman's life **but a prosecutor disagrees** then Idaho law gives the prosecutor discretion to prosecute the doctor.
59
506
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
5 months
Sorry to be a stickler, but if law enforcement officers endorse and stand by a politician who calls certain people “animals,” I think that may be evidence of unconstitutional animus in cases involving those officers.
@highbrow_nobrow
The Intellectualist
5 months
Trump: Democrats said please don’t call immigrants animals. I said, no, they’re not humans, they’re animals.
666
576
1K
73
365
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
4 months
My field is law not music, but if im understanding things correctly one side filed its brief and then Kendrick Lamar immediately e-filed his reply brief?!?!
18
131
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
When the Fifth Circuit halted OSHA's vaccine-or-test rule, many people noted its remarkable claims about the facts and law. It looks like the Sixth Circuit... had a similar reaction.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
31
279
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Seems like a great place to store classified docs
@MarcACaputo
Marc Caputo
2 years
8/10. Secret Service said it’s not in charge of access at Mar-a-Lago, “a private club” whose private security is in charge of club of “who may have been allowed access to their facilities”
68
309
929
7
193
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
can't wrap my mind around the view that routinely prosecuting nonviolent crimes by poor folks doesn't risk our system's legitimacy but prosecuting a coup would
9
308
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 months
If a Yankees flag had been flown outside an umpire's home, even briefly, I would expect that umpire not to work Yankees games.
17
225
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Between the YLS clerk boycott and mocking journalists at FedSoc we are seeing federal judges loudly announce that they are on a specific political team and I think we can take them at their word.
6
294
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
To be clear: this opinion means that when *the courts* misinterpret a statute and cause someone to be wrongly convicted or sentenced, that person is out of luck when the courts later realize their mistake.
@LeahLitman
Leah Litman
1 year
UGH final op is Jones . Thomas writes (6-3) that even if an intervening federal case shows *you were convicted of something that isn't a crime* OR *were sentenced to more time than the law allows* you CANNOT file a federal habeas petition.
39
407
1K
29
549
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Officials openly calling for the starvation of detained babies due to their national origin is perhaps a sign that enforcement of anti-discrimination guarantees has gotten a bit lax.
12
186
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
Weird how there are there are no federal judicial doctrines that inexplicably let civil rights plaintiffs win cases they should lose. Only the opposite.
12
165
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
SPRINGFIELD, MASS. POLICE OFFICER: Handcuffing and detaining potential witnesses is our protocol. MASS. APPEALS COURT: Your protocol "constitutes flagrant police misconduct."
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
13
287
1K
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Westlaw calls for "total and complete shutdown" of caselaw until our country's legal system can figure out what is going on.
14
77
981
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
POLICE: We've caught you trying to rob this bank. ROBBER: No, you misunderstand. I'm trying to seat an alternate slate of bank account holders.
4
151
968
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
It’s not just the press releases. It’s the police reports. It’s the legal briefs that rely on those reports. It’s the court rulings that rely on those briefs. It’s the legal system that is built on those rulings.
11
271
966
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Judge Cannon has issued this order dismissing Trump's Mar-a-Lago case.
Tweet media one
59
189
894
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Targeting nominees who represented criminal defendants relies, implicitly, on the idea that the federal judiciary should not be neutral but should instead be part of the prosecution team.
12
236
890
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
Supporting the 1st Amendment by doing a holiday card where my kids are holding signs showing their favorite swear words
21
49
881
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
This is completely, 100%, not accurate.
Tweet media one
20
133
874
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 months
Next time the Court will post the draft to Google docs and you’ll get to make edits but only in Suggesting mode
7
56
892
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
@nateraymond @WSJ Just a quick follow-up, Your Honor: If Congress were to pass a law that in your view impermissibly regulated the Court, what provision of the Constitution would you cite as giving you the authority to strike it down?
13
72
870
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Unfair to call this a conspiracy because if you’re even slightly familiar with our legal system you know a typical conspiracy allegation involves far less evidence
9
119
814
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
The constitution used to have a clause that might have prohibited the government — here, a judge — from ordering someone to be trained by a religious organization, but I guess they got rid of that clause??
@chrisgeidner
Chris “Law Dork” Geidner
1 year
NEWS: Federal judge in Texas orders airline lawyers to take "religious-liberty training" from the extremist advocacy organization, Alliance Defending Freedom, in issuing sanctions in an employment case on Monday.
Tweet media one
312
975
2K
13
174
815
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Having a court treat someone who tried to steal the presidency as though he retained some of its powers is not a healthy thing for our democracy. Not at all.
6
111
777
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Good thing the Supreme Court assured us that misogyny *never* plays a role in banning abortion. Otherwise I might be worried.
@atrupar
Aaron Rupar
2 years
Gaetz: "Why is it that the women with the least likelihood of getting pregnant are the ones most worried about having abortions? Nobody wants to impregnate you if you look like a thumb."
8K
3K
9K
18
153
752
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
It has also been my experience that I am very smart when arguing to judges who agree with me.
@nytmike
Michael S. Schmidt
3 years
NEW: The story of Scalia clerk who quietly became legal mastermind behind Texas abortion law. Our reporting found he explicitly wrote the law so it could survive regardless of what court did. His efforts to flummox court date to ‘13 when he 1st tried this.
245
1K
2K
6
78
763
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
@qjurecic It also seems like reporters are beginning to cover the justices as they would cover other public officials. And that offends people who are committed to the belief that justices are not like other public officials.
13
93
768
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
Congratulations to the United States of America on the nomination of Dale Ho to be one of its federal judges.
7
54
774
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
a law school rankings system that takes into account the % of a school's alumni who have supported overturning democratic elections
7
68
750
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
ICYMI: Nevada Supreme Court held that the Nevada Constitution's search-and-seizure guarantee can be enforced through suits for $ damages with NO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY DEFENSE.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
10
197
737
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Maybe BigLaw attorneys tend to strongly oppose the decisions of this Supreme Court because — and I’m just spitballing — most people who are good at legal analysis feel that way.
18
51
739
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Look it’s certainly your right to criticize the Court but it undermines our very democracy if you do so by protesting at the courthouse steps or at a residence or by calling for court reform or by analyzing justices like politicians or by writing a mean magazine article or—
11
68
730
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
So, to recap, the federal judiciary imposed nationwide restrictions on abortion access less than 1 year after the federal judiciary said it was returning the issue to the states.
18
231
698
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Hard to understand how courts could say that spending money is speech but not spending it isn’t.
@juliabacha
Julia Bacha
2 years
Breaking news: The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today that boycotts are not protected by the First Amendment. @ACLU has confirmed it'll take the case to the Supreme Court, with huge implications for free speech in America.🧵
867
12K
38K
14
132
697
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
just spitballing here but maybe there are downsides to teaching elite lawyers that they should not stand on principle if it might hurt them professionally???
10
66
693
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
An interesting exercise is to read the OSHA opinion and, in your mind, replace "COVID-19" with "fire" or "head injury."
Tweet media one
17
200
636
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
In case anyone was confused, this is what an attack on the legitimacy of the federal courts actually looks like.
@erindavisnews
Erin Davis
1 year
Gov. Ivey has signed the new congressional map and released the following statement: #alpolitics
Tweet media one
67
49
95
14
237
637
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
Is there clearly established case law saying the police cannot sneak up behind you and inject you with a COVID-19 vaccine, because if not I have an idea for building more support for qualified immunity reform.
10
94
623
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
When future generations ask where all the federal rights went, we will simply explain to them that these weren’t decisions on the merits
7
98
597
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
NEW: Dept of Homeland Security says "comprehensive search" turned up no records responsive to FOIA request for Trump's alleged declassification order.
Tweet media one
17
267
589
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
1
9
555
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
The alleged involvement of lawyers in these events is extremely disturbing and law schools should consider addressing it when they teach professional responsibility.
26
70
577
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
looking forward to this robot getting qualified immunity
@verge
The Verge
3 years
They’re putting guns on robot dogs now
Tweet media one
1K
2K
8K
16
89
566
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
Civil rights advocates acting as private attorneys general represent *injured* parties against people who *violated* their rights. They don't bring suits by *uninjured* parties to punish others for *exercising* rights. That's what SB8 allows.
Tweet media one
5
116
554
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
This is a pretty clear concession that the T42 policy was intended to control immigration, not COVID.
Tweet media one
6
124
539
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
I’m going to feel pretty bad for wasting time on things like “jurisdiction” and “causes of action” if it turns out you can just waltz into federal court with a Motion to Make My Client Happier.
9
117
538
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
This opinion is chock-full of little warning signs. Like, sure, you can get standing in fed court by arguing that something that hasn't happened one (1) time in 23 years still... might happen some day.
Tweet media one
14
114
528
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
@JanNWolfe This would never happen, but it's interesting to think about how this suit would unfold if one of the defendants chose not to file a motion to dismiss but instead to answer and proceed to discovery.
19
17
514
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
@ACLU_Mass @WilmerHale PSA: if you're thinking about doing crimes to migrants, please know that your actions could give them a path to a U visa and, ultimately, a green card. Something to think about!
9
58
508
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
1 year
Personally I do not think a professional sports league would say this is fine so long as the official discloses it.
2
29
500
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
Technically it's not overturning unless it's from the Overturning region of the Federal Reporter or the U.S. Reports.
3
47
503
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
5 months
The DOJ will 100% do this if Trump regains the presidency.
@ProfMMurray
Melissa Murray (@ProfMMurray on Threads 🧵)
5 months
Heads up: This is the strategy. They don't need to win Congress. They just need to win the presidency and then the new DOJ can prioritize the enforcement of the Comstock Act (a law that was enacted in 1873 and has been unenforced, tho still on the books, for much of our lives).
146
3K
6K
8
183
510
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 months
Does that mean customers can change their banking terms by just mailing new terms to the bank? (I'm guessing not.)
@BillyCorriher
Billy Corriher
3 months
NC Supreme Court rules that a bank can change its terms of service to require arbitration, just by mailing the new terms to customers. Riggs & Earls dissent. #ncpol
Tweet media one
2
13
23
3
117
507
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
we asked a Ouija Board what this document means and it said you’re not really a person
5
61
486
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Justice Thomas’s position seems to be that it’s unfair to say that SCOTUS is political because it’s not SCOTUS’s fault that one political party is always right.
1
42
488
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
On the bright side it’s been an amazing run for people who regularly get accused of being unduly alarmed.
0
68
492
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
5 months
A court saying the "original public meaning" of a constitutional right to privacy does NOT include abortion, even though it was enacted in 1980, after Roe said privacy rights include abortion, is among the most devastating takedowns of originalism I have ever seen.
11
117
501
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
. @ACLU_Mass , with support from @WilmerHale , is assisting 9 people flown to Martha's Vineyard who are seeking U visas. Statement👇
Tweet media one
4
81
479
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
NEW: ICE admits Trump-era practice of instructing officials to wipe their govt cell phones, per docs filed in @weareoversight / @ACLU_Mass FOIA litigation.
Tweet media one
18
370
467
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
The Court's rationale for gutting Bivens—deference to Congress—would be easier to accept if the Court had deferred to Congress in construing §1983, instead of, for example, adding a qualified immunity defense that appears nowhere in the statutory text.
Tweet media one
14
126
476
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
Imagine a court saying "the plaintiff's rights were not violated but they win anyway under the doctrine of A Thing The Federal Judiciary Invented." It wouldn't be tolerated. Yet, from SB8 to Qualified Immunity to so many other things, we are expected to tolerate the reverse.
5
76
460
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
@hannnahmmarie I think part of it is that some people with law degrees are very bad at analyzing and judging the key facts in a legal case, especially concerning people. Sotomayor is extremely good at this. It’s important to some people that this skill, which they lack, be devalued.
6
18
460
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
4 months
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals: Admitting rap music or videos in criminal trials is highly prejudicial, especially bc "by no means is rap the exclusive genre for glorification of criminal activity." Some examples from the Court:
Tweet media one
10
130
473
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Today the Supreme Court will hear two cases about whether higher ed can consider race in admissions, and if you’re wondering how the Court will rule then congrats on what must have been a very peaceful years-long slumber.
3
60
447
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
Our democracy will be safer when the professional consequences for endangering it outweigh the professional consequences for describing the danger.
2
104
431
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 months
One lesson here, particularly for law students and newer lawyers, is that while it may be frustrating to practice in courts where you and your clients will experience unfairness, it can also be exceptionally good training.
10
17
436
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
"this one weird trick allows you to have unconstitutional laws"
Tweet media one
13
92
396
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
6 months
I made this argument in a federal appellate court more than a decade ago, when I was an assistant federal defender, and a judge on the panel asked me if I was serious.
@OrinKerr
Orin Kerr
6 months
After Bruen, a police officer in New York can no longer assume that seeing a person with a gun in public — here, a possible gang member who has a gun in his pants pocket —is doing so illegally. No PC, motion to suppress granted. (EDNY, per Garaufis) #N
Tweet media one
100
179
709
12
46
404
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
5 months
you're not going to believe this but the Fifth Circuit just enjoined the New York earthquake
8
38
400
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
impossible to say what happened here until a special master decides which items actually belong to the dogs
2
46
392
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
When a SCOTUS justice has to explain (in a dissent from the denial of certiorari!) that a doctrine doesn't let officers kill people in order to "save" them from themselves, maybe that's a sign that the doctrine should be re-considered?
2
45
382
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
More fundamentally, there is no "progressive playbook" of suing people for exercising rights and then contriving to prevent courts from deciding whether that's lawful. Not yesterday. Not today. Not ever. Not even with the door to this mischief thrown open by the Supreme Court.
4
62
376
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
2 years
So. My colleague FOIA'd Trump's alleged "standing order" declassifying docs he took to Mar-a-Lago. Today the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency responded. And guess what?
Tweet media one
17
132
371
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
3 years
Everyone who cares about the health of the federal judiciary should read today's Fifth Circuit opinion staying the OSHA vaccine mandate.
11
116
365
@segalmr
Matthew Segal
22 days
This is, all too often, how the duty to disclose exculpatory evidence gets trampled: *If you don’t know what evidence has been withheld, it’s hard to prove a violation. *If you do know, the prosecutor will say it was no big deal bc you found it.
8
45
371