![Mike Coté Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1883749658012352512/ahA0hByR_x96.jpg)
Mike Coté
@ratlpolicy
Followers
4K
Following
311K
Statuses
42K
History, 📚, geopolitics, war | Words @NRO @ProvMagazine @Commentary @Quillette | Winning the Olympics of psychopathy - @realcandaceo 🥇🍾🏆
Somewhere Back in Time
Joined September 2017
Judges do not ratify the "will of the people." They adjudicate cases based on the law & the Constitution, even if the outcomes don't suit "the people." You can criticize decisions & appeal them. You can pass new laws. But Musk is describing a system totally alien to our own.
Bravo! We must impeach judges who are grossly undermining the will of the people and destroying America. It is the only way.
61
108
732
The JCPOA was not a solution at all. It was a temporary bandaid that financed Iranian terror operations & eventually would've allowed them to get to a bomb anyway. And if we joined Israel in bombing Iranian facilities, we'd set them back years.
US intelligence believes that an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear facilities would only set back their program by months or weeks (via Washington Post). It's not a permanent solution to the problem, which is why Obama negotiated the JCPOA in the first place.
0
1
5
It's currently 0° here in Colorado Springs, so I made a warming comfort dish for dinner: chicken noodle soup. It has rotisserie chicken, celery, carrots, onion, egg noodles, & plenty of herbs. Perfect for a frigid evening. #twittersupperclub
1
0
13
The people had a say already. Judges are appointed by elected officials who were voted in by the people. Just because the popular majority has shifted, as it always does in American politics, that doesn't mean that everything is flipped on its head. Judicial appointments that were made by the duly-elected government are valid. The political compact in a constitutional republic is not merely with the "people" of today, but with our predecessors, too.
1
0
1
@heslep A wrongfully arrested teacher exchanged for a cybercriminal mastermind. The names don't matter. The deal itself does. And it's a bad one.
0
0
0
@Chz_Burger If they're properly audited, there should be little. That's an important if. But the goals of this sort of spending are far more aligned with our foreign policy than are many of the programs they're replacing.
0
0
0
@BRyvkin Not to toot my own horn, but I called that war as the analog to this one way back in February 2022. Let's just hope we have a Disraeli in the White House willing to do a bit of gunboat diplomacy.
0
1
6
That was a pretty bogus impeachment, IMO. He did give Ukraine lethal aid during his first term, breaking with the Obama strategy of non-lethal aid only. But I agree that his current strategy seems more anti-Ukraine than it should be. I think he just wants this war over & thinks the easiest way to end it is by pushing on Ukraine to take a bad deal. It's an approach I profoundly disagree with.
0
0
0
@purplepursuer Saying that judges made wrong decisions about constitutionality does not mean they weren't deciding those cases on what they believed the Constitution allowed. You're making a category error.
1
0
0
If this is true (it seems pretty hyperbolic to me), it is an indictment of our foreign aid bureaucracy. If they're waiting until the moment before expiry to distribute these drugs, their logistics are absolute shite.
$300 million worth of medications are sitting on pallets about to expire thanks to Trump's effort to gut foreign aid. These drugs would've prevented people from going blind from a preventable tropical disease—Donald Trump would rather waste them in an East African warehouse.
3
3
25
@Arrekisu That's false. Lower courts rule on that, too. It's just that SCOTUS is the final arbiter.
1
0
3
@MikeBenzCyber Yeah, I'm not going watch anything involving that vile excuse for a human being.
4
0
6
@Rothamhouse And Ukrainian sovereignty is non-negotiable. Would Moscow like to affirmatively give up its designs on reducing Ukraine to vassal status? If not, why is NATO being taken off the table?
0
0
0
@MikeMcCroskey @heisme2010 And if they're anything like they have been historically, Democrats will do well. Americans like balanced government, even if they say they don't. That's what they vote for almost every single time.
0
0
0
@HoyasFan07 He likes exaggerating. Millions is also easier to say than tens or hundreds of thousands.
1
0
1
@philfCAL What is the job, though? Is it to do whatever is most popular at a moment in time or is it to use judgment to make the best decision given all considerations? That you think this is a distinction without a difference means you struggle to understand what a republic is.
1
0
1