Paper just published in @Clin_Med (Final version) Thanks to @asmeofficial for supporting this work with a Small Grant award. Indebted to the #SAS doctor participants and our peer reviewers. @Dawnjacksonk #SASDoctors #SAS #MedEd #ASME

@peterrhague You've brought it to mine! Maybe just block the original, delete your tweet and move on.

@WorkMemesDaily A relatively recent realisation of mine. There is no job so good, or amount of hard work that I can do, that it can't all be entirely spoiled by one absolute twat. And there is always one. Sooner or later. They come along and wreck everything for everyone.

@SteveInmanUIC Was this guy marking Mahomes last night?

@Jim_Hunter_MGP Wow!

RT @asmeofficial: Boost your research with the Medical Education Developing Scholarship Award! ASME and Wiley are thrilled to offer up to…

@MargotDA33 It's 🦇💩

RT @LucyLetbyTrials: Extraordinary to hear Tim Owen KC say that he is "very confident" that the Letby case will return to the Court of Appe…

@nate_postlethwt That a lifetime of people pleasing leaves you estranged from yourself.

@triedbystats "Groupthink"? He's not paying attention, then. The way the case notes were divided out, there were only ever two people looking at each set of notes, and they did so while blinded to each other's analysis. Only later did they share their analysis. He's sounding desperate.

@ContrarianJolly @LucyLetbyTrials Funny - when Sandie Bohin agreed with him he called it peer review. When 12 (or 11) people agreed with each other it was called 'a verdict.' An almost unassailable one at that. When 14 people agree with each other he calls it groupthink. 🤨

RT @asmeofficial: Make a difference in health professions education!⭐ Apply for the TIE Prize and be recognised for your contributions to…

@LucyLetbyTrials Personally, I think he weakens his position by campaigning for Lucy Letby. I think he should let his work speak for itself.

@ClarkeMicah @cjsnowdon He's just a troll. Block and move on.

@Sunnanbyrg @Topoxforddoc @TimesRadio @KateEMcCann Evans also has to consider (and inform the court of) alternatives to his main thesis. At the very least, Dr Lee et al. provide plausible alternatives, so Evans' evidence was deficient (never mind incorrect).

@TimesRadio @KateEMcCann Love how she's trying to school the expert.

@RussellScotland @triedbystats Curious coincidence, isn't it?

@NEUnion @DanielKebedeNEU You don't get many Teslas for £90,000... 🤨

RT @johnsweeneyroar: Lucy Letby: Was There Ever A Crime? Yesterday I asked Dr Shoo Lee how many peer-reviewed papers he’s written: “over 40…

@GMB @SwainITV Well done. You've spent half a minute thinking about the actual evidence of a miscarriage of justice, before moving straight on to intruding on the grief of the parents. This will be very hard for them. Their world is shifting under their feet *again.*

@HudsCheryl @ClarkeMicah When convicted, the question for doubters was "How can you believe she is innocent?" (the allegation being that doubters were persuaded by her gender and ethnicity). The better question has always been: "Why were you so ready to believe she was guilty?"