BOOK WRITING UPDATE: it’s on Amazon:

Huge discount on my book price right now on Amazon.

RT @dustinwmesser: Oliver O’Donovan: "Judging when political questions merit prophetic commentary requires a cool head and a theological se…

RT @martensmatt1: 🧵 on lawyers and pro bono: Being a lawyer in the US means having on a monopoly on access to legal justice. This monopol…

RT @jacklgoldsmith: To state the very obvious: The Supreme Court's emergency orders rulings will determine the fate of a large chunk of the…

@AshleyC49729953 I’m certainly for helping people. And there’s lots of Christian ethical teaching over the centuries on how to prioritize my obligations as a finite person. Nothing in Scripture commands that I agree any of the helping must be done through USAID.

@AshleyC49729953 Focus on the words “on balance.”

@bradstewart81 👌🏻

@JoshuaSethSchu1 👌

@ljgiblin All a fair debate. And I don’t accuse you of not wanting to help people just because we may disagree. That was my original point.

@ljgiblin I said “on balance.” If the cost of having an agency that does some good is that it also does serious harm, it’s entirely fair for someone to oppose it. And it’s entirely uncharitable for Holy Post to accuse those with whom they disagree of simply not wanting to help people.

@EthanReedy6 💯 That experience radicalized me. You can find press reports of the SEC staff calling me “f—-ing case killer” during my time there because of my rigor in fighting against garbage cases.

@RobC315 Yes, it’s different because you said “unilaterally” deciding. Here, the Admin is inviting the SCt to rule on whether it is correct. I can’t imagine how this is objectionable. It’s what a responsible President should do if he thinks a law is unconstitutional — ask a court to rule.

@RobC315 Sure. But where did I say I support that? This memo expresses an intent to get a court ruling on the question.

RT @WilliamMcCall_: Really can’t believe it’s even a question on if we should fire Hubert. The only question that we should be asking is wh…

RT @EdWhelanEPPC: It seems increasingly clear that Trump will have very few appellate seats to fill this year. He inherited four vacancies,…

RT @DougtheLawyer: How criminal appeals work The Court of Appeals: the evidence was admissible because the state couldn't prove its case…

RT @CaseyMattox_: @BasedMikeLee Absolutely not. No government employee - federal or state - should be unionized. It's ludicrous.

@uncsportsphotos