Pastor, writer, and podcaster (
@dotheology
). Middle-child trapped in an only-child's body. I sometimes explain complicated theological concepts through MS Paint
Last night, God called her home.
15 days before that, she was baptized
2 mos. before that, she believed the gospel
2 mos. before that, she was diagnosed Stage IV cancer
A year before that, she attended our fellowship
Before that, for 75 years, she wandered
Now, she's home.
Jesus is not waiting for Christians to establish His kingdom so He can return to inherit it. Christians are waiting for Jesus to return to establish His kingdom so we can inherit it.
It's dangerous to assume that a 20-something with a shiny new MDiv understands his Bible better than a farmer who has been teaching Sunday School for 20-something years. One is prone to thinking he has it all figured out; the other is prone to humbly serving in the fear of God.
All of the solid churches I know here in Utah are growing. We're seeing people come out of Mormonism and embrace the gospel of grace in numbers like never before. The Lord is doing big things out here!
Some are rejecting the reality that God has made a covenant with the nation of Israel because, currently, the Israelites reject Him.
Have you read the OT? He didn't disown Israel when they made the calf. Have you read your own heart? God is longsuffering, merciful and gracious.
I'm a dispensationalist even though I
-wasn't raised in it or in church at all
-haven't owned or used a Scofield Reference Bible
-haven't read or seen Left Behind
-reject end-times hysteria "ministry" (Hagee, Israel watch, etc.)
I just love consistent hermeneutics. And charts.
Just had yet another frustrating conversation with LDS missionaries. All roads lead back to "I received a feeling from God and you can't tell me otherwise." Always disappointing.
One of the coolest things about reading the Bible as a dispy is that you can read the OT prophecies and believe them. No looking for hidden meanings, reading between the lines, or redefining terms. You can place yourself in the audience's position, and their hope is your hope.
If you're a Christian and you use the same hermeneutic in the Old Testament as you do in the New Testament, you will believe in a future, literal restoration of Israel in their land.
Pre-trib dispensationalists reject the notion that Christians will escape tribulation; rather, we believe Christians will escape the *great* tribulation, the hour of testing that will come upon the whole world. God's people will not be subject to the outpouring of God's wrath.
The heart of the eschatology debates is a difference in hermeneutics.
Dispensationalists advocate for reading progressive revelation in context because a passage never comes to mean what it never meant. Covenantalists start with the NT because they believe OT meaning can evolve.
The church will be caught up together with Christ in the clouds before the Day of the Lord comes upon the whole earth. The church will indeed suffer many tribulations in the world, but she will not be subjected to the great tribulation brought about by God's wrath.
If Dispensationalism can be discredited by the tin-foil-hat fringe, then Reformed Theology can be discredited by the unloving, arrogant fringe.
Or we could just avoid playing that game altogether and focus on the biblical merits of each position.
Big announcement coming next week.
There's a dispensational media network about to launch. 🚀
Some of your favorite shows are joining forces to reach the masses with Bible and theology.
Christian Nationalism is popular because America is in the tank and Christians hope for change. The problem with Christian Nationalism is that the movement provides no true solutions, all the while distracting from the substance of real hope: the imminent return of Christ.
If the charismatic, miraculous gifts of the Spirit were still being given today, there wouldn't be a debate about it among Christians--it would be obvious to all Spirit-indwelt believers. The debate itself is evidence that it's not happening like it was in the first century.
Remember when the church in Acts didn't play politics or seek to establish a Christian nation, but instead sought to engage the world with the gospel and live at peace among themselves and with the world by being in the world but not of it?
The church is a *new* entity, according to Ephesians 2. Thus, it cannot be properly said that Israel is the church of the OT and the church is the Israel of the NT. Our desire for continuity should never overrule basic interpretive principles.
ReformedBros say Dispies are crazy, but we all do well to remember that one of those camps say that Satan is currently bound in the abyss...
And it's not the Dispies.
The New Testament directs believers to wait patiently for the return of Jesus Christ.
When He comes, He will subdue His enemies, execute judgment, and the government will be on His shoulders.
'Til then, we wait...proclaiming the gospel as we see the Day drawing near.
Revelation 19:19 says that the kings of the earth (and their armies) will oppose Jesus at His coming--and they'll suffer swift defeat. This means the world will not be Christianized before Christ's return. Postmillennialism is wrong. Indeed, few find the narrow gate (Matt 7:14).
There is no exegetically legitimate way to interpret Rev 19:11ff as anything but the Second Coming, and this is extremely problematic for postmillennial eschatology.
The Nicene Creed has no more spiritual authority than my church's doctrinal statement.
That doesn't mean it's unimportant, irrelevant, or wrong. What it does mean is that all accurate summations/articulations of God's Word must equally submit to the authority of God's Word.
Hermeneutics that prioritize literal meaning and context will always resonate with the common Christian because it's sensible, and reflects normal communication. Sweet old folks who have been studying Scripture for 50 years often won't buy in to hidden meanings. Praise God.
If the NT changes the originally understood meaning of OT promises, I can have no assurance of NT promises either. Their current meanings may one day be reversed as well.
Lumping all dispensationalists together is like lumping all continuationists or Calvinists together. Ryrie is not the same as Hagee, nor is Grudem the same as Copeland, nor is Sproul the same as Fred Phelps. Don't argue against a theological view by singling out extreme people.
If you've concluded that there won't be a future physical Messianic Kingdom on earth, you lose your motivation for examining the details revealed through the OT prophets.
My concern for defending dispensationalism isn't rooted in the dispensations themselves or even in end-times events. It's rooted in preserving the storyline of God's program as He has given it to us in the Bible, ascertained by a normal, consistent hermeneutic.
Church history is not authoritative in any way.
It's helpful, fascinating, inspiring, sometimes comforting, sometimes shocking, often complicated. It's worth studying and devoting much time to.
But it's never authoritative.
No believer in Jesus can lose the salvation that was given to him by God.
Eternal life can't die.
God's purchases aren't refunded.
Heaven's citizenships won't be revoked.
If you think dispensationalism is complicated, walk into a room of Reformed Baptists and Presbyterians and ask them to define the Covenants of Works and Grace with scriptural support.
No manmade creed or confession was inspired as the Bible was. There's also no such thing as inspiration-lite. A document is either inspired by God or not.
All manmade documents are fallible & must be tested by the infallible Word of God through believers committed to studying it
It's a joy to think about being in Christ's millennial kingdom. To see perfect rulership on display (and to rule with Him) will be nothing short of awesome.
The vision that was given to Ezekiel regarding the temple and tribes of Israel was not fulfilled in Jesus' first coming and it's not about the church at all.
The temple is the temple. The tribes are the tribes. The fulfillment is future.
Believe God's word as it is.
I truly appreciate many of my postmillennial brothers. The only problem is that we disagree about the Great Commission, OT hermeneutics, the nature of Israel, the Church, and the Law, the imminent return of Christ, and what the future holds. Other than that, we're good.
Postmillennialism rejects Christ's imminency, effectively changing the church's mission. They don't primarily see themselves as engaging in spiritual work that could end at any time; they primarily see themselves as engaging in earthly work that cannot end without global success.
In the Dispensationalism vs Covenant Theology debate, eschatology is the fruit, not the root. To have a productive conversation in that area, talk about hermeneutics and covenants. End-times charts must be saved for later.
In 2006, my mother killed herself.
Sunday, I conducted yet another funeral for a suicide. Yesterday I heard an update on a pastor whose wife killed herself last year. The brother of a sweet woman in our church killed himself last night.
The only answer to this is Jesus Christ.
Reasons why "Dispensationalism is young" is a bad argument against dispensationalism, a thread.
1. Many dispensational beliefs about Israel, the church, and the future have been held throughout all of church history. So, in that sense, it's not young at all.
If God would alter a covenant He made with a nation He created specifically for that covenant, then He would have no problem altering His covenant with me, a nobody.
A hermeneutic that spiritualizes the biblical text away from a literal, physical Messianic Kingdom will inevitably carry with it gnostic notes, insinuating that believing in a literal millennial reign is carnal. It sounds pious, but it diminishes the extent of God's redemption.
Remember when Irenaeus made up the pre-trib rapture that no one in church history had ever taught?
"In the end the Church shall be suddenly caught up from this; it is said, 'There shall be tribulation such as has not been since the beginning, neither shall be' (Mt 24:21)."
Look, I have disagreements with John Piper, too. But to write off his ministry is foolish. He's a brother in the Lord who has been gifted to encourage the church globally with biblical teaching. Declaring him anathema is immature and wrong.
The debate over the role of Israel in God's program isn't about eschatology per se, it's about the entire storyline of the Bible that began with promises to the nation in the Old Testament.
Anyone who is truly interested in modern dispensational scholarship needs to pay attention to
@mikevlach
. This five-part Q&A series is so good. Pay attention to his articulation of the pre-trib view and use it!
I'm coming up on a decade of studying Mormonism and ministering among the LDS in Utah. You want to know the biggest, most important point to make when seeking to communicate biblical truth to them? ⬇️
A creature will never be the Creator; thus, the Creator gets all glory.
CNs reason: If you're a Christian who prefers nationalism, you're a Christian Nationalist.
This isn't true, as CN is more than the sum of its parts. CN is a mission to Christianize culture with political power. It instructs Christians to take dominion before the King comes.
It's interesting that so much of the "dispensationalism is dead" crowd continues to talk about dispensationalism as though it's not dead. If you can stop believers from being Berean-like in their Bible study, you can stop dispensationalism. But you can't. So you won't.
Satan is not currently bound in the abyss. This will happen after Jesus returns to reign for a thousand years.
(see Revelation 20:1-7)
This is an often-overlooked issue when people consider whether the millennium is figuratively taking place now.
There are many people who reference their evolution in eschatology (bouncing around from one millennial position to the next) as if they are now certified to teach others about it. But Scripture speaks of being tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine as a shameful thing.
Reading the Bible is not an exercise in discovering hidden meanings.
Reading the Bible is an exercise in comprehending the plain revelation of God, that His word would be upheld in our hearts by faith.
If the nation of Israel wasn't supposed to take God at His word, then Christians today aren't supposed to, either. Israel's future matters because God's words matter.
I'm not sure who needs to hear this, but Pat Robertson is not Dispensationalism. Don't equate the false prophecies of a pseudo-charismatic with the robust systematic theology heralded by many cessationists.
If you spend time in the OT prophets (particularly the minor prophets), it quickly becomes clear that God will both judge Israel for her sin and restore her in her land among the nations -- with her own identity and covenant blessings. Problem is, many don't read the OT prophets.
The vast majority of those who have a seething hatred of dispensational theology don't know its history. Even more of them don't know the prophets. Oftentimes they only know Left Behind and John Hagee.
If your reading of Genesis 1-2 leads you to believe God created the world out of nothing in six literal days, your reading of Genesis 13, 26, & 35 should lead you to believe that there's a future for the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, & Jacob in the land God gave them.
After Jesus opened the disciples' minds to understand the Scriptures, they still expected a literal fulfillment of OT prophecies for national Israel (Acts 3:19-21).
Re: The latest trans news
Critiquing (with harsh language) men who leave their families and pretend to be women is not hateful.
Leaving your family and demanding that everyone must live a lie along with you is hateful.
Also, we must teach our children what's going on.
Dispensationalists should not be driven by an obsession with Israel, but rather by an obsession with the sovereign grace and faithfulness of the God of Israel -- the God who saves.
Last night, our church once again studied the inerrancy of Scripture and how it is understandable if we approach it with a normal hermeneutic, reading everything in context.
This is what God's people need to hear. Revere the Word, study the Word, cherish the Word.
If license is given to interpret any portion of the Bible apart from the intended meaning of the original human author, then license is given to interpret all portions of the Bible apart from the intended meaning of the original human authors.
Not only is being a "panmillennialist" stupid and an exercise of bad stewardship... It's also just no fun. Eschatology is a gift from God to be understood, enjoyed, and brought to bear on our lives today.
Dispensationalism is not primarily a theological alternative to Covenant Theology. Rather, it's a hermeneutic that holds forth fundamentally different values than the hermeneutic of Reformed theology. The theological systems are the fruits of the philosophies of interpretation.
This is my most "viral" post ever.
A couple of months ago she told me that she wished she could tell all her neighbors about her faith. I'd like to think that this is God giving her the desire of her heart for His glory.
Last night, God called her home.
15 days before that, she was baptized
2 mos. before that, she believed the gospel
2 mos. before that, she was diagnosed Stage IV cancer
A year before that, she attended our fellowship
Before that, for 75 years, she wandered
Now, she's home.
Contrary to some of the loud voices floating around here, true Christian masculinity will be characterized by love, peace, kindness, gentleness, and self-control. The fruit of the Spirit isn't just for girls.
Seven baptisms today...six first-generation believers! And the other one is my daughter...Happy Father's Day to me! God continues His awesome work in Utah. So many amazing things are happening out here.
Wow, what a ridiculous take. I'm no Moscow apologist, but for crying out loud... Let's let Christians encourage Christians with Titus 2-esque encouragement without crying "Law" all the time. The weakness of this faux rebuke would be more clearly seen if the OP wasn't Canon Press.
Biblicism is a philosophy of personal Bible study that rejects pre-conceived systematic theologies in order to understand Scripture on its own terms.
Biblicism doesn't reject systematic theology -- it just puts the Bible first as the lone foundation for belief and practice.
The longer I am in ministry the more I find this old adage to be true: "What you win them with is what you win them to."
Christians: Preach the gospel. Speak of the authority of the Bible often. Spend time mentoring the next generation in the faith.
Don't elevate performance.
The political scene is fascinating, scary, and highly-addictive right now. But Christians must not be consumed with worldly hype.
Pay attention, pray, keep informed, pray some more.
But keep reading your Bible and other Christian encouragements that keep your gaze fixed above.
It will please God to judge Israel, save the remnant, restore the nation, and rule over them in a perfect reign. The nations will celebrate this kingdom that extends from sea to sea and for a thousand years there will be no doubt that Christ is King of kings. It's coming!
To understand God's big program as He has revealed it, you must view the New Testament through the lens of the Old Testament. The OT narrative trajectory does not get reversed, upended, dissolved, or reinterpreted by Jesus or the Apostles.
As a dispensationalist, I never (truly, never) teach the dispensations dogmatically. I do, however, teach literal fulfillment of the OT covenants regularly.
@DrReluctant
is right -- "biblical covenantalism" is a much better term for our branch of theology.