It’s not from the etiquettes of Muslims to post online and show off their bounties that Allāh has bestowed upon them as it disheartens the needy and disadvantaged.
Shaykh Ṣāliḥ al-ʿUṣaymī حفظه الله
𝐁𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐨𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐒𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐚𝐡:
It’s recommended to do Tasbīḥ like this and not between the creases of the fingers as is popular amongst the people.
Shaykh Ṣāliḥ al-ʿUṣaymī حفظه الله
Just when you think it can’t get worse…these people pray for the non muslim who suicided and takfir the one who is a muslim that didn’t commit disbelief
This video is absolutely Disgusting, This guy recited Sūraẗ al-Kāfirūn to pander to a Christian Bishop that has more backbone than Him. Is This what has become of some Muslims? How shameful.
Sūraẗ al-Kāfirūn is not about respecting other religions as a lot of People distort it
Response to the misunderstanding of
@DrShadeeElMasry
on the Mālikī Mad͟hab’s view of covering the face (🧵)
The Thread will cover the following:
[1] Misunderstanding of “Niqāb”
[2] Niqāb in Prayer
[3] Covering the Face
[4] Advice to Dr. Shadee
The Forgotten Sunnah when hearing the Adhān:
“I am pleased with Allāh as a Lord, al-Islām as a religion and Muḥammad ﷺ as a Prophet and a Messenger”
Shaykh Muṭlaq al-Jāsir حفظه الله
The leader of scholars of Islām of our time, the braying of donkeys does not harm him.
ʾImām of the Ḥanābilah of Kuwait, al-Ḥāfiẓ Muḥammad Sulaymān al-Jarrāḥ al-Ḥanbalī used to recommend his students to study and stick to the works of al-Fawzān and to rely upon his Fatāwa
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐟 ʾ𝐀𝐬͟𝐡ʿ𝐚𝐫ī 𝐅𝐢𝐪𝐡! (🧵)
According to the Muʿtamad of ʾAs͟hʿarī S͟hāfiʿīs like al-Ramlī, it’s permissible to have intercourse with a Jinniyyah in the form of a donkey, cow, sheep and goat etc, you name it, if you marry her!
(1/4)
Below, Ibn Uthaymeen is asked about wearing a baseball cap 🧢.
He replies by saying that from a medical point of view, it's bad 4 the eyes 👀 bcoz it causes the eyes to become weak due to it preventing the sun 🌞 from hitting the eyes...
Blatant Lie from this Heretic
What Ibn ʿUṯhaymīn أعلى الله مناره is referring to is the one who understands the narration as being a shadow of Aḷḷāh derived from the sun whilst Aḷḷāh is below it. He labeled such a person more ignorant & obtuse than a donkey.
Rightfully so.
The entire commentary of these two “Imams” is scandalous and comical.
1) These two panderers didn’t waste time condemning a respected difference of opinion in Islam under the guise of “protecting Muslim women” and spewing emotional jargon.
Lewisham Islamic Centre Comments on The Online Dispute Between Zaid el-Omer and Umm Sumaya (Read the press release through our video above)
Please read & reflect.
Please find the press release in article format on our website:
This group of laity who associate themselves with Salafiyyah and then start refuting scholars on matters of Fiqhī issues is strange to say the least, and a lack of knowledge when it comes to the religion. Most of the time this group has not even studied the chapter of Ṭahārah
𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐬 𝐕𝐬 𝐈𝐬𝐥ā𝐦
Ibn Hubayrah al-Ḥanbalī cites consensus of all Muslims on the impermissibility of incarcerating people in prison cells & confining them for years, in a state that is uninhabitable.
All of which is a forbidden Bidʿah!
This is a notorious lie attributed to the father of al-ʾImām MIAW by his enemies.
Whereas, the reality is that his father was proud of him and used to praise him from early age for his sharp understanding and perception as attested to by his own brother al-ʾImām Sulaymān.
In the Ḥanbalī Mad͟hab, it is recommended to not marry more than one wife if the sexual appetite of the Husband is fulfilled and Polygyny would be permissible for him if he so wish. However if marriage with one woman does not fulfill him and he has sexual desires for more women
𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐝 & 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 Ḥ𝐚𝐧𝐛𝐚𝐥ī 𝐌𝐚𝐝͟𝐡𝐚𝐛
- It’s 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 to not cut anything from the beard beyond the fist length and to let it grow out as long it does not reach a length which will be
But when the Mushrik ʿAlī al-Jifrī says it’s Mustaḥabb (recommended) to congratulate christians on their Christmas and other holidays it becomes “normal to disagree without resorting to name-calling and Fitnah”
These hypocrites are the true enemies of Islām.
“𝐖𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧” 𝐇𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐕𝐢𝐥𝐞!!
al-ʾImām Ibn al-Mibrad said :
“As for the women, most of them have become prostitutes, more vile, more filthier than man”.
If he said this about the women of his time imagine what he would’ve said about the “women” of today?
I wonder if this includes the Shāfiʿī Polymath and teacher of al-Nawawī, Tāj al-Dīn Ibn al-Farkāḥ al-Fazārī (690 H) who had this to say about al-Rāzī:
“It is clearly evident that the Kufr (of al-Rāzī) immensely surpasses the disbelief of the Christians, and his writings are an
@AshariSomali
Honestly, at this point whoever says Razi was a magician or advised people to do magic is a fasiq. They no longer have a sound testimony.
Because;
1. We have the book.
2. We have the book he is quoting from.
3. Razi says clearly it is a book explaining what magicians do.
4.
In the Ḥanbalī Mad͟hab, it is recommended to not marry more than one wife on the condition the sexual appetite of the Husband is fulfilled and Polygyny would be permissible for him if he so wish in this scenario.
However if marriage with one woman does not fulfill him and he
According to the Ḥanbalī Mad͟hab, If a person is invited and goes to a Wedding Feast, it is Recommended for them to eat even if they are in the middle of fasting a voluntary fast. They should break the fast in order to eat.
(Fayḍ al-Jalīl by al-Quʿaymī, 3/137)
Dr Shadee is to blame for spreading this disgusting distortion of the Mālikī school into the western world.
I ask Allāh to give him exactly what he deserves
The great Maliki scholar Ahmad Al Mghaily:
The Niqab (face covering) isn’t Wajeb (mandatory), it’s actually Makrouh (disliked) for women.
He also says here, covering the face is suspicious ريبة, can be used to facilitate adultery, cheating, people’s faces should be seen.
Unfortunately Dr.Shadee is now about to double down on this blunder because contemporaries in Azhar & others made the same blunder.
Will we see an outrage from the Mālikīs on this issue? or will silence prevail until this is spread into western communities
Something the Jahmī revisionists will never mention to you is why their Imām Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī used to belittle al-Shāfiʿī every chance he gets?
Here he claims al-Shāfiʿī was ignorant of abrogation, accuses him of saying something evil and obscene, claims he threw aside
𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧 𝐃𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐞!
According to Ḥanbalīs, it’s preferable to avoid drinking coffee. However, if done so then it falls under the following rulings:
• It is 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐲 𝐠𝐨𝐨𝐝 if it is intended to help in good deeds
Ex: To be
Another attempt to bastardize the Ḥanbalī creed by a Māturīdī who has no clue about the school.
Take for example this individual’s lazy unacademic attempt to separate Ibn Taymiyyah from the Ḥanbalī school in his recently deleted tweet.
The Ḥanbalīs respected Ibn Taymiyyah’s
Allah grant us tawfīq to represent the Hanbalī Atharī tradition. This short course is a preparatory course for a series of classical Atharī texts that will be taught, Allah willing, by those will sanad in the Atharī tradition.
Meanwhile authorities in the Ḥanafī School recognize Ibn ʾAbī al-ʿIzz as a Ḥanafī and quoted him in their Muʿtamad books of the ʾAḥnāf and take his views into consideration.
He has a place with them whether old hags like you like it or not
Ibn Abil 'Izz is a Taymi in Aqeeda, & a Laa Madhabi in Fiqh. He was locked up 4 his deviant views by d scholars of his time, inc. d Hanbalis.
Abu Hanifa & Imam Tahawi R free from him & his Aqeeda.
The guy done 2 the Tahawiyya wat d Jews done 2 the Torah.
Some of the Ḥanābilah who considered it obligatory to send ṣalāh upon the prophet ﷺ every time his name is mentioned:
Ibn Baṭṭah al-Ḥanbalī
Ibn Balbān al-Ḥanbalī
ʿAbd al-Raḥman al-Baʿlī al-Ḥanbalī
May Allāh have mercy on them all
Part 2: The contemporary ʾAshʿarī Scholar
@Alminhaji
claims humans are only metaphorically existing and don’t actually exist.
Is this what the ʾAshʿarī creed teaches? That Allāh only created human existence metaphorically?
I think you mean contemporary ones.
I'll mention some of my favourites (not in order)
Sh Mustafā ‘Abd al-Nabī
Sh Muhammad Hasan Hīto
Sh ‘Abd al-‘Azīz al-Shahāwī
Sh Sālim al-Khatīb
Sh Saif al-‘Asrī
Sh Amjad Rashīd
And Sh
@Alminhaji
حفظهم الله أجمعين
Ibn al-Mibrad narrates from the scholar al-Yāsūfī al-Shāfiʿī that early followers of al-Shāfiʿī were upon the pure sunnah whereas the latecomers strayed from the beliefs of their Imām and followed the path of al-Ashʿarī.
He lists those who strayed off and among them is al-Nawawī
This autistic clown copies & pastes from his Rabbi Walīd misquoting al-Barbahārī to show Wahhābīs are Jahmīs.
Little do these sheep know this phrase is a slogan of the “Classical Ḥanābilah” against the Muʿaṭṭilah like Ibn Shaṭṭī. Per this clown this applies to him as well.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐲𝐤𝐡 𝐚𝐥-𝐈𝐬𝐥ā𝐦
Najm al-Dīn al-Ṭūfī al-Ḥanbalī said of him:
"The eminent scholar, the sharp-edged sword, the adornment of assemblies of debate and arguments, and the knight of fierce combat and struggle, the bright shooting star against
I normally don’t respond to this mentally deranged individual, but I’ll make this one an exception.
This fool thinks al-Muʿallimī is praising al-Kawṯharī whereas in reality he’s referring to him as such due to the fact that the followers of al-Kawṯharī themselves named him
“𝐌𝐞𝐧” 𝐇𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭!
al-ʾImām Ibn al-Mibrad said:
“Most of the people of our era have become irrational, rather most of them have become worse than animals, no intellect nor religion, and verily the people have become corrupted”.
(1/2)
It’s clear from the works of S͟hayk͟h al-ʾIslām al-Saffārīnī that he doesn’t view al-ʾAs͟hāʿirah and al-Māturīdiyyah as part of Ahl al-Sunnah, hence why ʿAbd-Aḷḷāh al-Qaddūmī al-Ḥanbalī responded to him passively in his المنهج الأحمد
al-Imām ʿAbd al-Ghanī al-Labadī
The great Ḥanbalī Imām, the Sea of Knowledge, Shaykh al-Islām Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad as-Saffārīnī said:
“Ahl al-Sunnah wa'l Jamāʿah is three; the Atharīyyah, their Imām being Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal; the Ashāʿirah, their Imām being Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī; and the Māturīdiyyah, their
Response to the misunderstanding of
@DrShadeeElMasry
on the Mālikī Mad͟hab’s view of covering the face (🧵)
The Thread will cover the following:
[1] Misunderstanding of “Niqāb”
[2] Niqāb in Prayer
[3] Covering the Face
[4] Advice to Dr. Shadee
ʾAs͟hʿarīs scream “don’t liken Aḷḷāh to the creation” day in & out, meanwhile they liken the creation to Aḷḷāh.
Here is al-Qāḍī ʿIyyāḍ & al-Suyūṭī giving the prophet ﷺ names that’re specific to Aḷḷāh.
Naming him: The compeller, The One, The Ever Living etc
(1/2)
2) These so called “educated muslim imams” throughout the entire commentary spent time condemning the “slander” of a sister and women but no mention of the slander on Zaid? No, of course not. Rather they state he was just someone abusing his platform like the typical Dawah bros
I read this book in its entirety, only those ignorant in Fiqh & creed will get fooled by it, I’m not sure how it gained popularity with Neo Ḥanbalīs, even Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Wāḥid (whom neo-Ḥanbalīs love) called مصطفى عليان a Jāhil and that the book is full of blunders.
(1/2)
𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐥𝐮𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐲𝐞𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 Ḥ𝐚𝐧𝐛𝐚𝐥ī 𝐌𝐚𝐝͟𝐡𝐚𝐛
- It is 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 to shave the eyebrows in order to shape it & trim it.
- It can be said it is 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞𝐝 to shave the entirety of the
@Musa_Maliki_
you’re inconsistent, I don’t care if it’s disrespectful it’s a blunder that was never said in the history of Islām, bring one classical scholar with in your Mad͟hab who held his view.
Right now all you’re saying is “he is my scholar there is no way he would make such a blunder”
3) Apparently it was muslim men who were excited to slander and of course abuse women, of course these cruel muslim men hate Muslim women. Yet no mention of the initial slander against Zaid or men? He was just abusing his platform after all. He deserves full condemnation
"Al Albani who didn't study"
What's up with these Sufis and lying?
Shaykh Al Albani did study and his teachers were:
• Shaykh Nuh Najati bin Adam Al Hanafi Al Albani, his own father who was a scholar who taught him Quran, Tajweed, Sarf and Hanafi fiqh
• Shaykh Muhammad
Speaking of Relied Upon…
Ibn Quṭlubughā al-Ḥanafī quotes from Shaykh al-ʾIslām extensively in order to explain the view of the Ḥanābilah then said:
“I’ve only cited the speech of this man (Ibn Taymiyyah al-Ḥanbalī) due to the acknowledgment of the people of his Mad͟hab
@Halabi101
It’s astonishing how your cult can’t seem to comprehend simple quotes like this, this is referring to your ilk who accuse Ahl al-Sunnah of Tajsīm and believe Taʿṭīl of the divine attributes is “Tawḥīd”.
Shihāb al-Dīn al-Marjānī al-Ḥanafī al-Māturīdī (1306H) outs the ʾAshʿarīs for inheriting the study of speculative theology from the Muʿtazilah who invented it from studying the works of Philosophers
The Muḥaqqiq throws a fit in order to do damage control
#UnveilingTaqiyyah
Ibn al-Mibrad al-Ḥanbalī said:
“The Shāfiʿiyyah and the Mālikiyyah rarely had animosity between them, and the reason for it is that al-Shāfiʿī was from the followers of Mālik.
It is said: The early (views) from his Mad͟hab is influenced by the views of Mālik, and due to that
4) These “Imams” would like to tell you that you are engaging in Ḥarām if you go against their pandering to women and throwing valid jurisprudential views under the bus with the pretext of preventing “abuse of muslim women”. Why am I not surprised? This is beyond disgraceful.
Response to the Misunderstanding of
@MoonStoneBlower
regarding the Issue of Women going to the Masjid (🧵)
The Thread will only cover two of the OP’s claims:
[1] Congressional Prayer Of Women In Masājid Per Shāfiʿī School
[2] Clarification of the Narration about Umar’s Wife
Picture of al-S͟hayk͟h ʿAdnān Sālim al-Nahhām al-Ḥanbalī, S͟hayk͟h of the Ḥanābilah in Kuwait and a legacy of S͟hayk͟h Muhammad Sulaymān al-Jarrāḥ al-Ḥanbalī
@D1mashqi
the real difference is you try to make the blunders of your scholars as minor mistakes whereas you over magnify the mistakes of others and even throw stones at that which has valid difference of opinion all in the name of defending your cult
Your words are extremely impactful and it’s not appropriate for someone of your caliber to misquote these texts and display them to the public in which they maybe misguided thereof.
I ask Allāh to grant you success and to give you the ability to recant and rectify this issue.
One of the most venomous Neo-Ḥanbalī today is Muḥammad al-Sayyid, he pretends to be neutral but underneath is a poisonous snake.
Ḥanbalīs recognize there is dispute on this issue even within the Madhab yet he pulls out “consensus” from the gutters
Ibn ʿAbd al-Hādī – despite being a muḥaddith – authored al-Ṣārim al-Munkī which violates the scholarly method, due to being under the pressure of supporting a scholar he admires, and supporting a view that contradicts consensus.
~ Senior Counterfeit-Ḥanbalī, Muḥammad
"Al Albani who didn't study"
What's up with these Sufis and lying?
Shaykh Al Albani did study and his teachers were:
• Shaykh Nuh Najati bin Adam Al Hanafi Al Albani, his own father who was a scholar who taught him Quran, Tajweed, Sarf and Hanafi fiqh
• Shaykh Muhammad
Najm al-Dīn al-Ṭūfī al-Ḥanbalī said:
“The last (view) that is authentic from al-Imām ʾAḥmed is speaking well of him [ʾAbū Ḥanīfah] and praise upon him. ʾAbū al-Ward from our companions mentioned it in the book ʾUṣūl al-Dīn, and Aḷḷāh knows best what is correct”.
These ʾAs͟hʿarīs like Haroun Kanj would have no issue with this type of garbage that is found in their books. Yet somehow, What Ibn ʿUṯhaymīn said about a 🧢 is more problematic? Even though what he said has merit from a medical standpoint.
(4/4)
NCBI reports that wearing baseball caps impairs visual perception and balance. I quote:
"Poor visual perception and consequently balance. Therefore, there are potential risks associated with wearing certain types of hat."
.
According to the Ḥanbalī Mad͟hab it is recommended (for men and women) to travel and visit the Grave of the Prophet ﷺ and his two companions رضوان الله عليهما with the intention to travel to the Grave of al-Nabī ﷺ.
@D1mashqi
The “blunders” is that which has k͟hilāf but the one that doesn’t such as saying it’s “Mustaḥabb to congratulate Christians on Christmas” is apparently a “mistake” of scholars
you can only fool idiots with your “blunders” now go back to bootlicking bashar👋
I couldn’t agree more. Shaykh al-ʾIslām Ibn Qudāmah lists the reasons to the superiority of ʾAḥmed صلوات الله وسلامه عليه over the rest
“Our imam, Abū ʿAbd-Allāh ʾAḥmed Ibn Ḥanbal was the most virtuous among them, closest to Allāh from them as a wasīlah, most adherent to the
Generationally, the Prophet ﷺ informed us that the best generations are the ones closest to him ﷺ. Except when it comes to the 4 imams, the phenomenon is the exact opposite. Ahmad is greater than Shafii, who’s greater than Malik, who’s greater than Abi Hanifa, exactly in
@nasafism
Moron, the dispute isn’t regarding whether they differed in affirming it or not.
The point is you claimed that Ibn ʿUṯhaymīn’s insults applies to Ibn Bāz. You got caught lying by omission and distorting the text and now you’re doubling down.
Typical of your kind.
It’s obligatory upon the laity to do taqlīd of the Muslim scholars in al-Furūʿ.
The only group that believed it’s impermissible to do taqlīd in matters of Furūʿ is a group of early Muʿtazilah from Baghdād.
So don’t be a Muʿtazilī
What would these Mālikī jurists say if they heard what Dr.Shadee is propagating & confusing the Muslims into thinking this is a disliked act to do? Especially given the fact he is addressing Muslim women in the West where the majority men in public are the Kuffār
(Fiqh Question):
Out of the four pictures, Which one is the Ḥanbalī position and which one is the Ḥanafī position on the placement of the hands?
Pick only TWO.