🚨New paper alert!🚨 Does the sheer number of available analysis workflows (and their potential for conflicting results!!) keep you up at night? Our new 📄🔽 in @NatureComms explores how embracing this variability may actually improve generalizability of results. 1/8 🧵

RT @MilhamMichael: Could embracing analytical variability in neuroimaging be the key to more robust and generalizable scientific discoverie…

📚 Read the full perspective here: for a deeper dive into how embracing variation can advance neuroimaging research. #SciComm #NeuroscienceResearch 8/8

RT @kaggle: 📣 Competition Launch Alert! Problematic Internet Use hosted by @childmindinst 🎯 Identify early indicators of technology use…

RT @ChildMindSci: Competition launch alert! For this competition, the datasets and support are provided by the Healthy Brain Network (HBN),…

RT @TingsterX: Hiring!! I am looking for a postdoc who is passionate about brain organization using multimodal neuroimaging data across spe…

@EikoFried I'm still distracted by the fact that the first two and last two authors are all named J{o,a}(h)n

@neuro_data No logical fallacy, just the assumption that one would emphasize the features of their tool that makes it distinct. Perhaps the more precise question then is why have you named it treeple, and does this mean that you believe is it somehow better for people than other tree libs?

@elneurozorro (get it? Heard? #greg)

@elneurozorro Just 'bike' haha 🤦

RT @TingsterX: Curious about human brain development through an animal model? 🧠🐒Check out our new preprint on Brain Charts of the Rhesus Ma…