Eiko Fried
@EikoFried
Followers
38K
Following
52K
Statuses
34K
Associate Prof @UniLeiden. Mental health & data science (https://t.co/NHlcPRzyYW). Building an early warning system for depression (https://t.co/xKqSGrvQnU).
Mostly Europe
Joined April 2013
🔥 Folks—there's a new paper in town, and I'd love to tell you about it. In the paper I wrote with @JkayFlake & Don Robinaugh, we take a bird's eye view on depression measurement. History, present, future. In particular, we discuss shaky theoretical & methodological foundations🧵
29
270
905
RT @DepressionLab: Fantastic review of SSIs (single session interventions) by @JSchleiderPhD and colleagues
0
6
0
These are unpaid undergrad students, which are understandably unmotivated. We paid our participants in WARN-D and provide them w personalized data reports. Currently working on a paper on insufficient effort responding. Prediction: it looks much better than in the below paper.
#statstab #275 Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys Thoughts: How much can you trust your participants? Very little actually. So, here are ways to identify slackers. #survey #participants #design #error #bias #measurement
1
3
43
First of many papers resulting from a @lorentzcenter workshop here at @UniLeiden by the MITNB consortium on measurement of ecological momentary assessment we organized in November 2024. More preprints soon, stay tuned!
Preprint: Thx to brilliant collaborators @LjrCloos, Siepe, @MarilynPicciri1, @EikoFried, @ShirleyBWang @MariekeHelmich, Hoffart & Johnson Results support accuracy & consistency of digital VAS & alleviate several key concerns about potential inaccuracies.
0
4
29
RT @OmidVEbrahimi: How Accurate & Consistent are Self-Report responses via Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) in Ecological Momentary Assessment…
0
11
0
"The CDC is seeking to withdraw all papers involving its researchers that are being considered for publication by external scientific journals to allow for a review by the Trump administration, a federal official told Reuters."
0
0
1
@EP_Editors Little disappointed that the EPA didn't leverage some overview work on this from last year that interrogated the literature and worked out recommendations, including our own overview (especially because many of the recommendations are identical).
0
0
0
Moved to a new enchanted neighborhood full of lovely witches and warlocks :). (no filters or edits)
2
0
47
@SJKim_Psych @Nature Yes this leans heavily on the qgraph package in R, but qgraph doesn't draw some of these colors, borders of edges etc so inconsistently, and the labeling is quite different.
0
0
4
@MKarhulahti did you happen to review this? maybe this looked fine during review & the problems arose later (I've seen journals do wild things with my figures in the copy editing process haha)
1
0
4
