The key fact in British politics is Jeremy Corbyn. If we had a decent Labour leader capable of speaking to "middle Britain", Johnson couldn't get away with any of this.
Sir Keir Starmer says he took £20,000 donation after promise to protect family in Sky News interview. "I wasn't going to let me son fail because of journalists outside the front door"
I can't say how much I admire Grieve. He's one of our very best politicians, and his defeat's a sign of the dodgy times. I suppose he'll return to the Bar now, but I hope he has some political or public role again.
DG on election night: “I have absolutely no regrets on standing on this platform at all. I wouldn’t wish to be a member of a party that was led by Boris Johnson.”
You have to admire Rutnam for not just taking the money and going quietly. He'll have done a lot of things in his 30-odd years as a civil servant, but his biggest public service may come now.
I'm furious with the Corbynites. But I'm also furious with people like this. Why didn't they do this in 2016? They went along instead, or just moaned, instead of doing anything. Cowards. In contrast: respect to the Bergers, Umunnas, Leslies, Gapeses et al, who did something.
Labour MP tells me: “Corbyn has got to go. Now.” Says that if he doesn’t go the PLP will unilaterally elect its own new leader to represent it next week.
Blaming May for the Northern Ireland Protocol is one of richest lies in the whole Brexit saga. The Protocol is what Johnson himself chose as his replacement for May's "backstop". Astonishing that he can just keep on selling bent bananas like this.
Something's spread invisibly in England that seriously threatens us. A free-floating up-yours querulous contrarianism on everything that puts two fingers up to "know-alls" and "ain't bovvered". Whatever "they" say, from climate to coronavirus, is just "Project Fear".
It's a disgrace that a health minister had nothing better to do than this at the moment. She should resign.
BBC News - Minister Nadine Dorries accused of spreading 'fake news' about Labour leader
The Ministerial Code's useless, and Lord Geidt's report on the Downing Street refurbishment is hopeless. Strange that he thinks Lord Brownlow acted properly "in a confidential manner" by not telling the PM he'd paid an invoice, yet civil servants were at fault for doing the same.
These councillors are right to leave Labour, and Starmer should be happy to see them go. Bonkers that they see a foreign policy stance rather than, say, social care in Burnley, as of overwhelming political importance to them.
BREAKING: The leader of Burnley Council and 10 other councillors have resigned from the Labour Party over Sir Keir Starmer's decision not to push for a ceasefire in Gaza, Sky News understands
@RupertMyers
I haven't broken it, though I'm well and would like to visit my 88 year old mother, who's alone. Even if some of his critics have broken lockdown—they're not the PM's chief adviser. If he stays, Johnson's either a coward or an idiot or both.
Lucy Powell on BBC News has accused the Labour government of 1997-2010 of "trickle down economics". Does a minimum wage, high employment, redistribution through tax credits, higher pensions, better rights at work and massive spending on the NHS amount to "trickle down economics"?
If there's ever been a "Project Fear" then this is it: populist scaremongers talking up the likelihood of violence if they don't get their beloved Brexit. Anyone making this argument should be ashamed of themselves.
What a joke Brexit is. I wonder if those border controls will ever come in. The Conservatives are obviously afraid of the consequences of the thing they destroyed themselves to achieve.
Maybe I’m a retired colonel or something, but I think it’s okay to insist he does this properly. If we ever democratically choose a republican constitutional order, it’s reasonable to expect MPs to be loyal to it. If that’s right, the same must go for the current order.
NEW: Labour MP Clive Lewis has been made to swear in again, having taken the House of Commons oath “under protest” last week
In his initial rendition, Lewis also *forgot* to swear allegiance to King Charles' “heirs and successors” — which I suppose was a no no
Attempts 1 & 2:
"It would have been a huge success if it hadn't been for the BBC, Remoaners, the New York Times, Hammond, the Supreme Court, Juncker, Barnier, WhatsApp, Buzzfeed, the government's own EU Exit Analysis—Cross Whitehall Briefing ..."
Article 13.8 doesn't say anything like this. Anyone who's following the issue must find it both wearying and depressing that claims made by famous Brexiters are so often just flat-out false.
1) Section 13.8 in the
#NIProtocol
makes it very clear that both sides are committed where necessary to 'replace either in whole, or in part' if it doesn't work or areas cause trade diversion and/or political instability which is damaging for the Good Friday Agreement.
I just heard Matthew Parris say in a podcast that this would be a sort of coup d'état, and he's right. Just saying this means Raab is dangerous, and it shows us the Conservative party is edging towards extremism.
NEW: Raab becomes the first leadership candidate to refuse to rule out proroguing Parliament to force through a no deal Brexit
He says ruling anything out is “weakening our hand with the EU... If I become PM we are leaving at the end of October”
Grr. You can't take your employer to court "for constructive dismissal" no matter how often journalists write it. What you can do is take action against them for *unfair* dismissal, if you say you were constructively and unfairly dismissed.
Brexit is far worse than Suez. It's just as humiliating in terms of projecting UK power, yes. But it also divides us in an enduring way and, crucially, it does long-term economic damage too.
She and her government need to go. If May is allowed to continue, March 12th will simply be postponed to March 20th, and March 20th will simply be postponed to March 28th. She's making no progress, she's just trying to blackmail Parliament into a bad deal.
British governments don't sign treaties with foreigners, seek and get re-election on the basis of them, then just renege on them months later. This would not be British government as we've known it. It'd be something else. This government is something else.
During these uncertain times, our great country is crying out for reassurance, and a positive post -Brexit vision. Let us all not lose sight of the belief; our greatest years do lie before us. Brexiteers please do keep the faith.
#Brexit
will happen.
As a former government lawyer, I think it's hilarious for Dominic Cummings to complain about "the shocking influence of lawyers on policy". Lawyers advise; ministers decide. Only an incompetent, unfit politician (or political adviser) blames his lawyers for his own decisions.
Whatever the truth here, you can't have it both ways. If you complain that this kind of remark has led to you being abused, you can't also dismissively say that your bosses' remarks (e.g. about lawyers) have nothing to do with abuse or violence that follow.
Boris Johnson tells ITV News the Withdrawal Agreement Bill will provide “the highest standards and protections in this country” on workers’ rights and environmental standards. Clear sign he needs more Labour votes 1/2
People should stop underestimating Starmer. I've stopped. Not liking things he says is one thing; thinking he doesn't know what he's doing is another. Turning worse than Kinnock '83 to not that far off Blair '96 in three years is astonishing, and not all down to luck.
I think it'd be more consistent with his own views if Lord Sumption, an ex-judge mostly famous for saying judges should interfere less in political matters, interfered less in political matters.
@OwenJones84
You're as responsible for this as it's possible for a journalist to be. The absurd, repellent hard left you've championed has delivered the country to the worst government either of us has lived through. Well done.
I like Mary Creagh, and agree with her. But you do have to ask: why wasn't she saying this sort of thing publicly before? If most Labour MPs had spoken as frankly as this in 2016, 2017 and 2018 things might not be so bad.
"We have in Jeremy a man without honour and without shame - and a type of preening narcissism that means he thinks he's still got something left to offer the Labour movement."
Former Labour MP
@MaryCreaghMP
criticises Jeremy Corbyn after she lost her seat in the election.
She now says she gave no legal view. In a sense, that's the problem. She's entitled to be political where that's consistent with her wider role. But law and legality must be first, last and always top of mind for the Attorney. It wasn't this time: politics was. She should resign.
Protecting one’s family is what any good parent does. The
@10DowningStreet
statement clarifies the situation and it is wholly inappropriate to politicise it.
I think the fact that a majority voted for Grieve's amendment against the wishes of government, in itself justifies Bercow's decision to allow the vote.
@CarolineFlintMP
You honestly, seriously think the danger is of the EU harmonising labour standards downwards after Brexit, and that Brexit Britain will be all about protecting workers from the EU? I wish we could have the pre-Brexit Caroline Flint back.
I certainly don't agree with this take. The jury found that they didn't break the law. Arguably one way to attack the rule of law in these circumstances might be to presume them guilty and call the verdict "perverse".
The line parroted by Geoffrey Clifton Brown on Newsnight, that the UKIM Bill doesn't breach the Withdrawal Agreement unless the powers it confers are used, is wrong. The UK has already breached article 5 of the Withdrawal Agreement.
@EmmaKennedy
@DPJHodges
You're right that he should have sacked Cummings of course. But I think this was always bound to happen because Johnson is simply unfit for ministerial office. Bound to happen quickly against the background of historic challenges like Covid and Brexit.
The next, maybe last desperate argument Brexists will resort to is "It's too late. Maybe you're right that it's bad job, but we just have to put up with it now." It's not true. The EU27 will agree to extend a50 if we want to think again.
I agree that that was ridiculous. Wrong of Farage to try upstaging the formation of the new government by holding a press conference, and wrong of the BBC to go along with it. He could and should have held his event on another day.
The BBC cuts from the construction of an actual Labour Cabinet to watch Nigel Farage shouting at hecklers. The BBC has, sadly, had a terrible election.
"Another referendum would be disastrous"; "Ignoring the 2016 referendum would be disastrous". These are fair points. But I can only take them seriously from people who recognise that *keeping on sailing for the rocks will be disastrous* too. We must find *some* way out.
Plain Tony or Sir Tony—it's trivial. I think his critics on the right can be ignored. What can't be, is that he led the best government you and I have known, or are likely to know in our foreseeable future. His critics on the left should think seriously about that.
I think Johnson is making mistakes already. If he's daft enough to refuse to go to Brussels, Dublin, Berlin and Paris now, he'll find it harder to go later; and harder to say it was the EU's fault when he pivots to his No Deal policy.
Johnson now in the worst possible place. Burned up good will and political capital to save Cummings. Govt seriously damaged by this. But he'll be humiliated if he lets him go now and it's far too late to get credit for doing so. Rock & a hard place
@alexhallhall
I think you're missing that many, many vote switchers will have views like hers, and Labour does want them, and wants them to know it wants them. "Go away, we hate you, keep voting Tory" is the vibe Labour gave off when it was losing badly. And the two things were connected.
Meanwhile solicitor general, Robert Buckland says Parliament night have to prorogue - ie pack up and start again in another session - says speaker is ‘interventionist’ and ‘tensions of brexit’ are starting to bite
On Channel 4 News, Sammy Wilson MP just gave an interview based on either (a) ignorance or (b) dishonesty about the Protocol. He claimed it was meant to be temporary; but anyone following this knows the temporary proposal was May's "backstop"—that both he and Johnson rejected.
@toadmeister
Nah. You can only think this if you believe government—rather than Parliament—is top dog in our constitution. But that's not been true for a long time.
“Brandon Lewis was wrong when he said the Government was breaking the law in a limited way?”
@pritipatel
: “We are absolutely not doing that.”
#KayBurley
I watched Adult Human Female, prompted by the protests against it. It's simply a reasonable talking heads documentary in which people make points some will agree with, others not. There's no justification at all for trying to stop anyone showing it.
They'd propose a "special place deal" in which fires and torture were replaced by alternative arrangements (the tech's already available, not beyond the wit of devil, etc.) and want it to be time limited rather than lasting for all eternity. They'd hold all the cards.
I suspect Johnson is incapable of sacking Cummings. I bet he announces a Cabinet Office inquiry, which he plans to drag out endlessly and Cummings intends not to cooperate with.
This is important, and worrying. If crowdfunding is going to help unpopular or minority causes enforce their rights, then platforms can't impose strong ideological tests. I hope there's a good explanation—not just disapproval of her views or favouring the intended defendants.
crowdjustice appear to have closed my crowdfund against Stonewall and my chambers. It had reached a record breaking £48K in 6 hours. Could this all get anymore sinister? Don’t worry, I will raise the money. I’m not going anywhere. We will triumph. Keep heart xx
Britain isn't in a constitutional crisis, and it's not helpful to say so. There's no conflict with the courts, Queen or Lords, and MPs will get their way if they find one. But it is a very serious political crisis, caused by bad political choices and requiring better ones.
Rees-Mogg claims a law firm could review all retained EU law in a month. Hard to convey, to those who've not done legislation, how simply mad this claim is. Well, they could do it in a month if they just said it should all be kept as is—but I doubt that's what he means.
#ReesMogg
had all the power to deliver, when he was
#Brexit
opportunities
#Minister
, but he failed, so now blames 'remainers'. It's truly pathetic, but pleasing to see more people realising that the opportunities were a big lie all the way along.
1/2
We need to make up our minds whether we want to live in a Parliamentary democracy, where power lies with elected representatives, or else in a "party democracy" where everyone's bossed around by committees of unelected, unaccountable and fanatical local activists.
EXCLUSIVE: Extraordinary exchange of fire between MP and Association - 1)
@NickBoles
's Association Chairman calls his No Deal threat "not patriotic", 2) In reply, he sticks to his guns, citing his "duty to the country".
What Lord Kerr says here is impossible to disagree with, really. The fact that it may seem a bit daring or controversial is a measure of how intolerant and absolutist ministers have become recently.
This calls May's Chequers approach "soft Brexit". But it's not, and we mustn't accept an Orwellian language shift on this. May wants hard Brexit, many Tories want a harder one, and in 2016 I don't recall even the hardest Brexists advocating No Deal.
This, if genuine, is even worse than the garbage the government put out last week. Full of lies and errors. They can't even spell the word "breach", and I mean that literally.
NEW: Part of the ERG’s internal briefing note on the Internal Market Bill being circulated among Tory MPs.
“This Bill does not break International or domestic law.”
Britain's financial settlement will not be paid in a single lump sum. So if Brexist ministers are threatening not to pay now, they'll *always* be threatening not to pay. If we want reasonable relations with our neighbours in future, we need different ministers.
No, she wasn't arrested or charged "for standing still and thinking in public". Misleading to claim this without mentioning the Public Space Protection Order that was in force to protect users of the clinic targeted by anti-abortion protesters.
This woman was attested and charged in the UK for standing still and thinking in public.
No, this isn’t a joke, this actually happened. Charged on four counts of thinning in a public space. Unless you stand up to this, next year will be 1984, not 2023.
Difficult, now, for Johnson to say the EU simply refused to negotiate. And hard, I think, for him to maintain the fiction that not a day's more time in November would help. I think his premiership is about to hit the wall he's been hurtling towards.
Very hard to understand why it's only now occurring to some Conservative MPs that many of their colleagues actually want No Deal as their preferred outcome.
After today’s vote it’s looking as though the ERG actually *want* NoDeal - not just to help negotiate a deal, but as the actual outcome. I’ve supported it for 2.5yrs to help the negotiations, but if hardline Brexiteers try to make
#NoDeal
outcome I’ll vote to stop them
#newsnight
Pathetic. Civil servants and government lawyers have to do a lot more than this all the time. How have we let ourselves be governed by such incapable people?
Widespread ministerial unhappiness that they have to read 120 odd pages of dense and complex stuff in just a few hours before making historic decisions on UK’s Brexit future. They are not sure if tardiness of distribution is Downing Street cock up or conspiracy
Some of the submissions being made in this tribunal case seem extraordinary. Is this employer really arguing that the government has a positive legal duty to suppress "gender critical" feminism as being views that in themselves amount to degrading treatment of others?
Claimant's views fit the definition of transphobia: she is scared of them and dislikes them. Therefore in conflict with the fundamental human rights of trans women, esp. Art 3 freedom from inhuman & degrading treatment. Her views violate dignity.
This shows Cameron didn't understand the relationship of EU law to our own even after six years as PM. Why not? It's not that hard. Pathetic to blame lawyers, as if they could have made a circle square just because Johnson asked for a square circle.
It delights my legally pedantic heart to read this BBC report in which it's said, rightly, that Sir Philip Rutnam is making a claim of *unfair* dismissal:
Lots of us didn't agree to
#EURef
. We told you we were fine. You, the Brexists, insisted on the stupid referendum you'd made no plans (you had 40 years!) to implement, and *you* are to blame for this not only predictable but predicted fiasco.
I can't understand comparisons to Suez. I think whatever view you have of Brexit it's obviously a much bigger deal in terms of Britain's international policy and future than Suez.