New
@AmReformer
article, "The End of Birthright Citizenship," draws to a close (for now) a series on immigration and American citizenship & identity.
In this piece I distinguish between territorial and political birthright citizenship. But first:
The Great Churchill Debate sparked by
@martyrmade
's interview with
@TuckerCarlson
is eye-opening on many levels.
In my graduate coursework at
@Hillsdale
College I took a PhD seminar with Larry P. Arnn (President) on Churchill. Arnn had studied in England with Martin Gilbert, the
"Judeo-Christian values/heritage" is a mythical invention of 20th century, post-war, anti-communist liberal ideology used to de-Christianize and secularize America.
It’s okay to not want thousands of foreigners to invade your country. Even legally.
And no, Americas is not and never has been a “nation of immigrants.”
@HwsEleutheroi
C’mon James, no need to go down the cult route. Are citizens not allowed admiration—dare I say love—for a statesman who defends them and shows courage and resolve in the face of death?
Results in Ohio tonight prove the founders right about one thing: direct democracy (e.g., constitutional amendment by referendum) is incompatible with good government. Left to themselves, the people descend into mob rule.
Also from tonight: natural rights are dead.
We must find
These kinds of blanket pronouncements are as stupid as they are immature.
We’re not obsessed.
We were raised in an effeminate world, that shot us up with harmful vaccines, fed us toxic food, medicated us with drugs, constantly barraged us for wanting to excel as men, denied us
No. This just means you’re a pastor, not a statesman. Does it follow that:
“If you view murderers as criminals to be put to death rather than a mission field you be won, you’ve given up a biblical worldview for a pragmatic worldly one”?
No. False dilemma. Poor theology.
If you view the left as an enemy to be defeated rather than a mission field to be won, you've given up a biblical worldview for a pragmatic worldly one.
Christian Twitter: “Trump said some crazy things about abortion the other day!”
Me: “Trump has said many crazy things.”
Christian Twitter: “But Trump is being wildly inconsistent here!”
Me: “Trump has been inconsistent before. He was still a great president.”
Christian
Instead of sending a carrier group to the aid of Israel, the Biden admin and the entire DC cabal should be mobilizing the U.S. military to target and crush Colombian and Mexican drug cartels in America, and seal the southern border permanently.
600-700 Israelis were killed in
Black Christian leaders are finding hope with Kamala Harris, reports
@harvestprude
.
The vice president’s faith and commitment to issues is stirring enthusiasm among the traditionally Democratic voting bloc.
@douglaswils
has asked for substantive and respectful responses to
@RevKevDeYoung
's criticisms of Moscow and Doug's approach to politics and culture. So, here's the substance.
1. DeYoung's criticism centers around what he calls the "Moscow Mood." He defines this as a "visceral"
This is an opportunity to clarify something important. What both
@douglaswils
and
@realchrisrufo
supposedly mean by "religion" is "world religions." But that's not what the foundering generation usually meant by "religion"; instead, they meant distinctions among Christians:
This is not only political kryptonite, it's a radical departure from our founding principles. Article VI of the Constitution: "No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."
Two things can be wrong at the same time:
1. The endless and embarrassing fawning over Israel on the right (esp. by naive Christians and neocon boomer war hawks) due to an artificially concocted “Judeo-Christian” synthesis and a projection of our own nationalistic desires onto a
Founders Against Gay
As promised, we will dedicate this June to demonstrating in detail the ways and reasons the American founding generation was against sodomy and homosexuality. We will look at statutory laws, political and moral treatises, and personal reflections by leading
James
@HwsEleutheroi
it seems like your experience is very different than mine. I’ve encountered no snarky or infantile preening, but godly Christians serious about their physical and mental health in an age in which these are in deep decline generally in America.
I’ve also seen
@benrcrenshaw
So far, all I have seen has been snarky childishness. Not a single argument from Scripture making the pursuit of physical strength a passion that should be compared to our passion for godliness or holiness. Tells me there is a lot of conviction being covered up with snark on
For those interested, I have written some on the Post-War Consensus at
@AmReformer
where I do lodge some of my own complaints against Churchill (although I think FDR was far more culpable and compromised).
Cruz rejects historical American & Christian sexual morality.
Thomas Jefferson (1779): sodomy is “carnal copulation against nature…of man or woman in the same sex.”
Bowers v. Hardwick (1986): state criminal sodomy laws in 1791 punished homosexuality up to the death penalty.
Jenna, not sure why you’re defending this barbaric Ugandan law.
It imposes life imprisonment for consenting adults who engage in gay sex. That’s ridiculous.
You or I may or may not agree with their choices, but consenting adults should not go to jail for what they do in their
"If I were to back away from the Word of God, what authority would I have?" asks
@DustyDeevers
.
Many Americans probably feel uncomfortable with such sentiment. Isn't this religion polluting politics? Ought we maintain the 'separation of Church and State'? No.
Consider this
The reason for this is simple but profound: modern Israel is a symbol or token of the Postwar American Regime—an America remade by FDR and progressive Democrats in the 1930s/40s. The state of Israel came into existence by the will of the US-backed UN in 1948. We feel we bear
Glenn Beck says that his whole purpose in life is to defend the Jewish people, and proceeds to read a letter he sent Bibi Netanyahu asking for dual citizenship in Israel.
This week
@AmReformer
I respond to the anti-abortionists (
@LilaGraceRose
,
@BenZeisloft
, & others) saying that Christians should not vote for Trump.
Abortion is murder and the goal of abolition is noble; but Trump is a necessary means to that end.
For all those who follow Jesus Christ, I’m concerned about the term “Christian.” Why?
1. Too broad. Do you mean Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Oriental, Coptic? Anglican, Presbyterian, Baptist, Methodist, Reformed, Brethren?
The term is so broad as to be useless.
"'Christian nationalism'- yea or nay?" with
@William_E_Wolfe
on
@FreemindFM
Christians should be hesitant to embrace "CN" because the term
1) is too broad
2) is too tainted
3) encompasses some extremely bad beliefs
4) plays into the hands of progressives
“I should be judged by the content of my character”
said Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. as he committed serial adultery against his wife and approved of gang rape.
Of all the clips from
@TuckerCarlson
’s interview with
@douglaswils
—which in many ways was very good—this is the absolute worst to pull and circulate.
Doug is wrong, badly so, and this sentiment severely harms any effort at Christian government (which is odd because Wilson is a
No one should vote third party, such as for the American Solidarity Party. Think about it like this:
The American party system is currently structured as first-past-the-post, winner takes all. I know you don’t like it, but that’s how it is.
Voting is a political act. The virtue
We've seen a lot of evangelicals committing to voting against Trump, or at least staying out of the election, since the GOP platform shift on abortion.
@MESabo86
is here to dowse this idea in cold water. A must-read this morning from American Reformer:
Trueman doubles and triples down on stale and myopic talking-points in rejecting
@aaron_renn
's Negative World model. Trueman says the negative world has always been with us. The gospel is foolishness to the world, remember?
But Trueman continually fails to grasp the argument
The Church has a prophetic voice and answers to a higher authority. “Prophetic” does not mean “triggering the libs.” It means calling anyone and everyone to faith and repentance, no matter the social and political exigencies of the day.
It’s becoming increasingly evident that anti-CNs can barely muster a 90 IQ, have not done the reading, will not do it, & couldn’t understand if they did; are dictated by handlers, rely on caricatures, regurgitate shibboleths, filibuster opponents, & stoke outrage when challenged.
It’s becoming increasingly evident that those chiefly promoting the “Christian Nationalist” movement are petty tyrants who merely want political power and are simply attempting to use and pervert Christianity as the vehicle to achieve it.
This is no more biblical or morally
Very nicely done by
@megbasham
. I witnessed these shifts in evangelicalism in real time. Both my alma maters (Taylor University, Denver Seminary), once reliable stalwarts of biblical orthodoxy & Christian ethics, first went soft, then “woke.” Sad, stupid, and unnecessary.
“You have to ask, is that what we see so many prominent evangelicals doing today? Are they preaching against the prevalent sins?” |
@megbasham
Watch the full essay:
@contramordor
That’s right. Leftists academics embrace relativism in the classroom as a way to destabilize and deconstruct traditional beliefs and ways of life, but they are not themselves relativists.
@DocSandlin
This is a half-truth. Read Jay in Federalist No. 2, Madison in Federalist No. 14, and various other Fed papers that clearly reference American geography, history, and common kinship as integral aspects of the nation.
I disagree. This is the wrong response to MSNBC’s blunder on “Christian Nationalism” and the role of Christianity in American political thought and practice.
Reducing America’s political history and origin to “Enlightenment liberalism” and then summarily rejecting it is
1. This is important and not a message that will be popular with many American Christians.
The optimism of the 1700’s is well behind us now. This idea that enlightenment liberalism could be seamlessly fused with Christianity must be seen as a failed experiment.
Actually, two years after the creation of the Republican Party in 1854, the 1856 party platform stated,
“Resolved: That, with our Republican fathers, we hold it to be a self-evident truth, that all men are endowed with the inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
I’m not offended that the wonderful
@pnjaban
offered a prayer at the RNC. The GOP is not Christian and has never pretended to be. It is a multi-ethnic, pluralistic coalition that looks like America. My king is Jesus, but I love my neighbor who worships someone else.
Separation of church and state is an invention of the 20th century. We should reject it. It’s not constitutional. It is not Two Kingdoms doctrine, which Protestants can rightly claim as theirs.
The basic flaw in this conversation is believing that superficial formal similarities in language or concepts communicate the same beliefs or ideology. What's missing is an historical and substantive analysis.
For example, both the Left and Right have a concept of identity, not
New article: "What Is the 'Woke Right'?"
In it, I offer a definition, provide examples, and argue that the "woke right" and the "woke left" both embrace critical theory, which is why Christians should reject both.
I want to thank
@JennaEllisEsq
for reading my article and commenting on it. She has provided a wonderful opportunity to explain the political thought of our founders, which she either doesn’t know or understand very well.
Jenna says that it is “simply incorrect that
@NateAFischer
@benrcrenshaw
Further, his analysis of Hamilton is simply incorrect that pre-political rights essentially transform into mere civil rights (or privileges) when under a social compact or government.
Crenshaw argues:
“What Hamilton is saying—and what is also clear from Parson’s Essex Result—is
My response
@AmReformer
to Brian Mattson and
@DocSandlin
on my piece defending
@NatConTalk
.
I clarify an element of political theory regarding natural & civil rights in pre-political vs. political thinking.
I then discuss the current state of affairs.
Of course the Jews needed Roman permission to legally execute Jesus (Jn 18:31). That’s why they went to Pilate.
But Pilate never would have crucified Jesus if the Jews hadn’t called for his blood to be on them and their children (Mt 27:25), insisted that Barabbas be released
Thomas Jefferson, one of the most dedicated liberals of the founders, proposed this law in 1779:
“whoever shall be guilty of sodomy shall be punished if a man by castration, if a women by cutting through the cartilage of her nose a hole one-half inch in diameter at the least."
The virtuous Statesman has an almost impossible job in seeking to prudentially rule for the good of his community.
There are many challenges, but two of the greatest come from the Philosopher and Theologian.
Why is this? I will explain.
A 🧵(1/20)
No.
Magna Carta was a charter, not a social compact.
The Declaration is a political covenant, not merely a social compact.
Nat rights are not reduced to privileges via civil rights: they are not a grant from govt but a duty to secure, and this is done via civil law.
@NateAFischer
@benrcrenshaw
CN’s are arguing that America’s Constitution was a social compact similar to the Magna Carta or other landlord / serf fiefdoms. In those types of compacts, men surrendered all their rights in exchange for protections and could only exercise what privileges the Sovereign
Let's respond to some of
@DennyBurk
's points at
@WNGdotorg
to
@MattWalshBlog
's movie:
1. Walsh isn't just seeking to "own the libs." (
@NeilShenvi
also gets this wrong w/"defeat the left" rhetoric.) The Left's ideology, behavior, and national policy is demonic and evil: it
The responsibility of the civil magistrate to rule for the good of his people, which necessarily requires secure borders and the careful vetting of legal immigrants, is not incompatible with the mission of the church to care for needy immigrants among us.
This is elementary,
“I was a stranger, and you…”
Demanded I be deported.
Spread hate and lies about me.
Didn’t care how your lies caused bomb threats at my school.
Held onto your hatred for what you believe I am rather than actually know me.
“Whatever you do unto these, you do unto me.” -Jesus
Coming soon to a confused Christianity near you:
The Quantum Way
Don’t like having to choose between 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th ways? Think each has a grain of truth? Fret not! The Quantum Way is for you—combining everything & being nothing all at once! Blissful irrelevance assured!
"1st and 2nd Way" (Left and Right) "3rd Way" (Centrism, on the spectrum between Left and Right). "4th Way" (Off the spectrum between 1st and 2nd ways; not a compromise or combination of them). The Biblical view is so often a 4th Way,
These kinds of blanket pronouncements are as stupid as they are immature.
We’re not obsessed.
We were raised in an effeminate world, that shot us up with harmful vaccines, fed us toxic food, medicated us with drugs, constantly barraged us for wanting to excel as men, denied us
No, but under two conditions: (1) the reversal of incorporation since religious establishment, liberty, and regulation was left to the states; (2) the understanding that no religious test was not meant to create a secular nation but protect the Christian people & laws already in
The idea of "ordered liberty" is tautological and deceptive.
There is liberty, and then there is slavery.
Liberty is always virtuous, always ordered toward objective good and beauty.
Slavery is either external (imposed on you against your will) or internal (disordered
Good news reported by
@calvinrobinson
. Hugely significant. There will be a new 'first among equals.' This statement is beautiful and encouraging. But it is also deeply sad: the Church of England apostate! May God grant repentance.
2. Once again become a national and hemispheric power instead of an abusive, manipulative, financially reckless, and duplicitous global hegemon that Fs everything up, that makes enemies out of potential allies, and uses proxy wars to settle personal grievances and fund private
The thankless task of reading/reviewing Russell Moore's new book has fallen to
@tlloydcline
at
@AmReformer
. Brutal review.
TL;DR version: Moore has TDS, and has been reduced to a stuttering, angry imbecile.
Read the review, not the book. Time to move on.
Unattributed quotations passed off as your own thoughts on social media is a form of mass deception
@NeilShenvi
.
Stay far away from people who do this. They are not trustworthy.
We should secure our borders, provide a pathway to legal status with appropriate restitutionary measures, and maintain the priority of family unity, to produce an efficient immigration system that honors the value and dignity of those seeking a better life.
New LONG FORM ESSAY at
@AmReformer
🔥
In which I give a defense of National Conservatism
@NatConTalk
against the charges of "authoritarianism."
And in which I recover many of the pre-liberal elements of the American founding. Read 👇
@haivry
@martyrmade
@TuckerCarlson
@Hillsdale
I don’t necessarily disagree. If Cooper wants to claim Churchill was the “chief villain” of WWII, he will have to bear the burden of proving that, as well as answer those who know far more about Churchill and WWII than he does.
Supposedly this is a big "gotcha!"
But many of us now supporting Trump made the same political journey that Vance did: from normie Con Inc. to MAGA. I was Never Trump in 2016. But they point is I didn't stay there. Same with Vance.
So this isn't remarkable or even interesting.
My
@AmReformer
article this week: why America is not a nation of immigrants.
This phrase is constantly used to signal American exceptionalism and justify unprecedented levels of immigration.
But it’s propaganda and a lie. Find out why 👇🏻
Immigration for many is the single biggest issue in this election.
@benrcrenshaw
lays out a case for why you shouldn't be duped into thinking America is a Nation of Immigrants. Exclusively at American Reformer:
Great article by Mark DeVine at
@AmReformer
responding to
@PLeithart
on why the Right is still enthusiastic about Trump.
Leithart's
@firstthingsmag
article is a good example of a detached professionalism that thinks understanding America and the current political landscape
Earlier I posted that politics is not a syllogism in response to Neil. But here he doubles down, to great embarrassment and foolishness.
First, P2 is false in both A and B. Politics is not identical to war. War and politics are very different. Politics often employs or reverts
A)
1. In war, it’s ok to lie to enemies
2. Politics is war
3. Therefore it’s ok to lie to political enemies
B)
1. In war, it’s ok to kill to enemies
2. Politics is war
3. Therefore it’s ok to kill political enemies
If you don’t accept B, you shouldn’t accept A.
To put this in context, from 1774-1784, the Continental Congress issued TWENTY resolutions for days of thanksgiving, fasting, and prayer. All of them were explicitly Christian.
Washington was not alone.
Of the first four presidents, Washington, Adams, and (even!) Madison
George Washington's Thanksgiving Proclamation of 1789 is quintessential American Christian nationalism:
"Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection
There is really only one reason to support and vote for Trump, and it’s not for his position on any one policy issue, let alone abortion:
He is kryptonite to the oligarchy.
And that, right now, is all that matters.
The Bible is not a manual on political philosophy.
B/c politics is an architectonic science that seeks man's good according to his reason and sociality, there is much the Bible says that touches on the political art.
Christian politics derived entirely from exegesis is largely driven by the demands of democracy and modern education, because energizing the masses requires you to appeal to what the masses know.
Premodern Christian politics was informed by reason, experience (e.g., pagan
The solution is to abolish public schooling. Allow individuals to send their children to schools that reflect their values(or keep them home). Have your Ten Commandments in a private setting. Don't let the state decide what religions are good or right.
I asked
@_kruptos
what he thought the essence of liberalism was. This was his response, and it's good. I still want to dig deeper. If we're going to toss out liberalism, we need to know what it is we're rejecting, why, and what we're going to replace it with. This also relates to
@benrcrenshaw
That is a really good question. It is fundamentally a worldview oriented around human freedom, where freedom is defined as the ability to exercise my personal will to make choices without restraint. It is a belief in the idea that human beings are capable of making good
Modern evangelicals are more concerned to avoid being tagged with naughty ethical labels than they are in saving the lives of millions of innocent babies murdered in the womb.
Staggering.
@JoshDaws
Josh, isn't this just consequentialism? Couldn't we just substitute any sin and say "Imagine thinking it would be wrong to use [murder/theft/lying/kidnapping] to undermine the regime...."?
At what point are we just throwing out God's commands?
Immigrants are either brothers and sisters in Christ or people whom God loves and has given us an opportunity to reach with the gospel where otherwise they may never have heard.
1. Deal with Israel as an equal sovereign national entity, trade and make alliances with her in our and her interests that have conditions for support in case of war that include Congressional approval for funds or weapons (and not just omnibus bills, but a declaration of war—you
Notice the parallel in which soldier = Patriot, and religion = Christian.
The founding generation often spoke nondescriptly of “religion,” but everyone understood them to mean “the religion of the people,” which was Christianity.
“The Commander-in-chief directs that Divine service be performed every Sunday at 11 o’clock, in each Brigade which has a Chaplain. Those Brigades which have none will attend the places of worship nearest to them.—It is expected that officers of all ranks will,
Founders Against Gay (part 2)
Zephaniah Swift (1759-1823) was a politician, lawyer, chief justice, and diplomat from Connecticut. He authored several important legal treatises, including A System of the Laws of the State of Connecticut (1795).
In Book Five, chapter IV,
Founders Against Gay
As promised, we will dedicate this June to demonstrating in detail the ways and reasons the American founding generation was against sodomy and homosexuality. We will look at statutory laws, political and moral treatises, and personal reflections by leading
“Diversity” is not a virtue.
It’s a description of a state of affairs/set of things that are heterogeneous in their natures or properties.
This can be good or bad. Discerning that requires a moral standard.
Only confused minds think “diversity” is a virtue or is the standard.
Don’t answer this poll. Neil is data mining in order to “prove” there’s a far right woke element among the right. An X poll will be used as “scientific” proof.
Chief Justice Burger: “I write separately to underscore my view that, in constitutional terms, there is no such thing as a fundamental right to commit homosexual sodomy.”
"But therein is the fatal flaw of this book: It is more logical than biblical [...] Overlaying a logical heuristic at the expense of prima facie readings of Scripture is not a methodology that one can accept within a redemptive-historical hermeneutic."