ZackGianino Profile Banner
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ Profile
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ

@ZackGianino

Followers
6K
Following
93K
Statuses
49K

Freedom Techno Republican 𝕏 UCSD‘17♆ 𝕏 Vice Prez @SDYoungRepubs 𝕏 Millennial 𝕏 The Paul Revere of San Diego 🚨🇺🇸 #HereWeGo 🅧

San Diego, CA
Joined February 2019
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
10 days
Last night 𝗣𝗨𝗠𝗣𝗘𝗗 𝗠𝗘 𝗨𝗣 🫡🇺🇸⚡️ My all-time favorite part of being involved with the @SDYoungRepubs is seeing new faces at our events, connecting w/ existing members & even having constructive engagements w/ Dems curious to know who we are & what we stand for! 💯🤝
5
4
60
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
30 minutes
A joint oversight. Multiple industry leaders, members of the public, elected officials, etc. It’s not complicated. And it would be a significant benefit to the city to have a collective mainstream multiparty audit of this infrastructure. Some infrastructure is essential, some could probably be debated & reformed.
0
0
1
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
1 hour
0
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
2 hours
@JaysonKamoss Thank you! I’ll need to do a little more research!
1
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
2 hours
@JaysonKamoss ….-_- Where did you find that out? Or how did you find that out?
1
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
2 hours
@JaysonKamoss How funny would that be? Lol unless you’re being serious…
1
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
3 hours
@WillRK787 @paulkruegersd @DOGE I think a review is adequate. A review would highlight where pet projects and wasteful spending can be rolled back.
1
0
2
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
3 hours
@Ken_Tid Strange times we live in.👀
0
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
3 hours
@rawsalerts Pickle Rick is NOT happy about this post…
0
0
2
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
4 hours
In many cases, it’s more than me just ideologically disagreeing on their stances, which I mostly do. 🔘 It’s the condescension. 🔘 It’s being disingenuous. 🔘 It’s being forcefully divisive when campaigning to be actively unifying. 🔘 It’s pretending to be accessible, but making it only accessible to those in your world view/circle. 🔘 It’s demonizing your constituents to the point to where you never meet with them. 🔘 It’s publicly telling people you are against being bought and paid for while privately and unexplainably accepting $$$ from those same entities. 🔘 it’s sensationalizing opposition via tribalistic tendencies. 🔘 it’s lecturing the public to be compassionate while doing nothing to humanize yourself in the process. 🔘 it’s telling the larger public you meet with constituents and hold town halls when in reality they are really just scripted zoom calls. There is a culture of “leadership” that has failed the American public miserably and these people all play by the same playbook. #FedUp
0
0
5
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
4 hours
@ItsMeMissie The defense is honestly in most cases — indefensible.
0
0
1
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
4 hours
It’s theatrical & performative. Sara Jacobs does this type of crap too. She learned it from people like Lorena Gonzalez. They only get activated when the opposition party is in charge and act like good old representatives. But those of us that have been following along and not turning away, can see just how theatrical it is.
0
1
3
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
4 hours
@sullivanms @ItsTheHousing I mean, if we’re gonna talk about the “self anointed caucuses” in Congress then we’re gonna be here for a long time.
1
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
4 hours
I agree. But what you are saying are all the positive things about USAID which is not the majority of the things that are being put on the chopping block. And for my understanding a lot of this funding has been paused for review and it doesn’t mean all of it and any of it is going to never go to where it was going. I just think it’s Time for an overdue audit of the millions and millions of payments our government habitually issues.
1
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
4 hours
@sullivanms @ItsTheHousing There are members of Congress that have formed a doge caucus and have began working more formally with the department of government efficiency.
1
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
5 hours
I’m glad you provided this link because it speaks to the exact difference we see here. Much of what we’re talking about is legal theory and interpretation. As it always is. Should versus shall, etc. I’m not saying I don’t agree the president shouldn’t have unilateral jurisdiction, but they do have responsibility over the operational productivity And capability of the departments they directly oversee. And much of this happens through a chain of command. As it always has.
1
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
5 hours
Anytime there is a large governmental reallocation of wealth, there are always going to be shocks to the system. That’s nothing new. Happens all the time with senators begging for certain navy ships to be built that have no relevance to the fleet but still get built for jobs, etc.
1
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
5 hours
USAID allocated $1.5 million to advance DEI in Serbia's workplaces and business communities. Another $70,000 was spent on producing a "DEI musical" in Ireland. [WASTE] There was a $2.5 million investment in electric vehicles for Vietnam, which has been criticized for its relevance and effectiveness. [WASTE] USAID spent $47,000 on transgender services in Colombia. Small but [WASTE] Following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, USAID spent $1.14 billion on a port and power plant project, which was promoted by then-President Bill Clinton. However, the project did not result in any construction. These are just to site a few but holy hell I could sit here for the next 37 hours and list all of the pathetic, irrelevant and wasteful spending items that have been recently highlighted.
1
0
0
@ZackGianino
𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ
5 hours
@slaurvick But are strangely still defending that wolf.
1
0
1