The left's mythological "Party Switch" is being dismantled piece by piece by our team:
An introductory 🧵:
Jimmy Carter - The Real Southern Strategy 🧵(part 1):
Jimmy Carter - The Real Southern Strategy 🧵(part 2):
Jimmy Carter: The Real Southern Strategy 🧵(part 1)
An upcoming book reveals how Carter's ascent to the Democratic Party leader relied on his Southern segregationist coalition and use of racial politics.
More details and citations:
Jimmy Carter: The Real Southern Strategy 🧵(part 2)
An upcoming book reveals how Carter alongside George Wallace was pivotal to the real Southern Strategy of the Democrats.
More details and citations:
Jimmy Carter: The Real Southern Strategy 🧵(part 1)
An upcoming book reveals how Carter's ascent to the Democratic Party leader relied on his Southern segregationist coalition and use of racial politics.
More details and citations:
Guess who said this:
"Southern Republicans must not climb aboard the sinking ship of racial injustice. They should let southern Democrats sink with it, as they have sailed with it... Republicans should adhere to the principles of the party of Lincoln... leave it to the George
Historians like
@HC_Richardson
weave absurd connections between the brutal murder of three civil rights workers and the Rep Party. This fraudulent linkage conveniently overlooks the fact that the only genuine connection lies with the Democratic Party:
…used during the American Revolutionary War, symbolized the colonies' reliance on divine justice in their fight for independence. Its evergreen tree represented resilience. Commissioned by George Washington.
@PB_ByTheSea
Prove what wrong? A vague notion based on a discrepancy of what a small number of people believe the confederate flag means to them and what you think it means to them? We don't spend time on unpersuasive deflections.
If Dems consistently appealed to segregationists through the '60s-'70s with a clearer “southern strategy” than Republicans, it's absurd to call it a “party switch.” If both did it remotely evenly, there’s no switch. Examples are endless: Democrats were far far more guilty.
If Nixon&Reagan, accused of using "dog whistles" to appeal to racists, actually loudly spoke for civil rights, this negates the conspiracy of coded signals to a shrinking racist electorate. Racists value alleged obscure subtle signals more than overt campaign themes? Nonsense.
The years of this supposed “swap” were years of virtual no-contest Republican landslides (1972, 1980, 1984), by both Nixon and Reagan. There was no desperation, or need to switch ideologies. There was no need for “retreat.”
This myth isn't just an unfounded interpretation of history; it's about controlling a narrative to make people believe the ridiculous and perform its rituals. The formation of the myth is an intriguing story, showing how a political party grapples with 130 years of evil.
Any one of these facts alone dispels the myth of parties switching ideologies. There are far more accurate ways to describe the complex changes they underwent. The notion that two rival parties traded ideologies is absurd.
@DisneyKid1955
The research that shaped your understanding is shockingly not "well researched" as demonstrated in the above link. Example: you believe that the Goldwater campaign focused on his opposition of civil rights. Here he talks about specifically enforcing the 64 CRA:
@Erik_Naught_6
@ReadTheScore
@yourbestam
Those are three very different things. “DEI” conflicts entirely with the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which one do you support? One cannot support both.
How many people on the left will denounce the U.S. because of its past crimes, but be proud to be under the banner of the Democratic Party? The Democratic Party is a disgrace. Start a new one.
While Carter is remembered as a pro-civil rights progressive, his proximity to George Wallace and similarity in politics, were incomparably closer than Wallace was to Nixon. Nixon et al., are erroneously accused of attempting what the leaders of the Democratic Party did.
Throughout 1970 Carter embarked on a deliberate campaign of openly attempting to align himself with George Wallace and Lester Maddox. Carter borrowed campaign symbols like Wallace's well-known slogan, "Our kind of man," in prominent TV advertising and print.
... (1936 Gallup) The South heavily favored the concentration of power at the Federal not State level, a dramatic difference from more modern sentiments. Democrat's and Republican's political philosophy however have remained remarkably similar.
Short of nominating Wallace, a party couldn't align more. Yet, Nixon is charged with courting Wallace and supporting a busing moratorium, backed by Dem frontrunners. The Dem Southern Strategy was clear but ignored. Why?
Follow and support RTS for more:
RE: party switch myth, if you’re told to trust leftist historians, here is but one example of their standards.
They take a Goldwater quote, distort it to mean the opposite, some even insert a half line from a diff occasion. And they all thoughtlessly repeat it. Peak mediocrity
The pervasive explanation for GOP dominance in the South is the "Southern Strategy," which allegedly caused a "Party Switch" of Southern segregationists, forming today's GOP. This fiction ignores who led the Democrats in the 1970s, Jimmy Carter.
Join us and support the effort to read the score of history using our uncompromising analysis and research, including newly unearthed evidence from our upcoming historical narrative-breaking book, Dismantled: The Party Switch Myth
Like the Dem Party, Carter's rise is owed to exploiting the prejudice of voters until it was politically advantageous to stop doing so. Carter possibly did get the very last ounce of political juice from the rotting fruit of racial injustice in Georgia.
@Thermionic_St
This is just one example of an objectively false foundation. There are many more, like Kevin Phillips, who wrote this in the introduction of his book that "confirms" the "Southern Strategy:"
“The book does not represent—or purport to represent—the past or present ‘strategy’ of
He wanted to boycott schools along with Lester Maddox if they were forced to bus, calling busing orders “the most serious threat to education that I can remember.”
Wallace was the face of segregation, and Maddox the notorious violent segregationist who famously wielded an axe handle and pistol to prevent black customers from entering his restaurant. Maddox became an icon of resisting integration and a leading Democrat.
In 1966 Nixon started his war to dismantle the Democrat's one-party controlled segregated South. Contrary to conventional wisdom regarding the future president from Georgia, this war included fighting against Jimmy Carter.