![Nick Palmer Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/507899762/avatar_x96.jpg)
Nick Palmer
@NickAPalmer
Followers
165
Following
3K
Statuses
11K
Green, brilliant, impatient, impolite. I want a sustainable world now!
Cornwall, U.K.
Joined November 2009
@PoyetPatrice @idummkopp @priscian @MusicFrom90 @kissingtruth @AtomsksSanakan @kevhof52 @Proemed45 @Konrad_Chapman @Robert76907841 @MarcEHJones @Rebecca74083947 @25_cycle @NdabaningiMoyo @patfrank830 @Visitor51171015 @AutumnMandrake @rwerkh @DoubleDumas @Anvndarnamn5 @COrepKdeGraaf @DaleGribble_666 @ejwwest @greenartdf @zebedeem @BennoList @Willard1951 @LxxResearcher @waynejv1973 @VoteBlueUrban @jemmm85517813 @military_1776 @TWTThisIsNow @BrknMan @RCownie @ICcrapdaily @ClimateRetorts @CymaticWave @DarrenDrpage @SGMTrailbuilder @CyfraithEcocide @MarkOgge @JrmeBrwnCt @TheDisproof @judithcallagha9 @psud12 If you think your book debunks climate science, you are seriously deluded. If there was any genuine science in it that showed up large holes in climate science, the world, but particularly the giant fossil fuel corporations, would have already beaten a wide path to your door...
0
0
5
@AndyWest_tweets @wideawake_media Total fuzzbrained denialist bollocks. Climate science does not have the big holes in it that propagandists like you imply, or else the giant fossil fuel corporations would be shouting it out from the rooftops & it would be headline news all over the world. They're not & it's not.
0
0
0
@bannister_jimbo @xynyxs @ryankatzrosene Your point is a a P.R.A.T.T. - a point refuted a thousand times
0
0
0
@jimkiss @antonioguterres Your images completely fail to invalidate climate science. Only a fool would think they do...
0
0
0
@Michael03282460 @antonioguterres You seem unaware of the fundamental difference between global average warming and your cherry picked and misleading small area temperatures.
0
0
1
@Artemisfornow Well, either you had a bad installer or you're incompetent running it or you're a malignant liar just making up stuff.
0
0
0
@_ClimateCraze @TalksWild You know that NONE of the giant fossil fuel corporations accept any longer the deceitful propaganda that corrupt individuals like you spout, because they know climate science is rock solid and types like you are deluded or lying.
0
0
1
@_ClimateCraze It staggers me that you are so deceitful or stupid that you are regurgitating this tired old PRATT (Point Refuted A Thousand Time).
0
0
0
@RondureGyre @CColose @ChrisMartzWX Sorry. Missed this comment before. This graph should give you an idea of the relative proportions of LIA cooling and current global warming. The LIA was not a global phenomenon not that cold...
0
0
0
@RondureGyre @CColose @ChrisMartzWX Here's Musk saying why he thinks the revenue neutral carbon tax is the 'biggest control knob' to sort out global warming
0
0
0
@RondureGyre @CColose @ChrisMartzWX As a Trump supporter you might like to see Elon Musk, who's now in Trump's inner circle, giving a good scientific explanation of why anthropogenic global warming is a big problem.
0
0
0
@RondureGyre @CColose @ChrisMartzWX Deflection? If you're too scientifically illiterate to understand that between me and Bonus/The Disproof we've shown you all your views on climate science are deluded nonsense then you probably are incorrigibly stupid.
0
0
0
@RondureGyre @TheDisproof @CColose @ChrisMartzWX Yet again you show your gross scientific illiteracy with your ignorant assertion. Did you not understand Professor Ricard Alley's video, that I linked to earlier?
0
0
0
@RondureGyre @CColose @ChrisMartzWX Google what Gore actually said, as opposed to what deluded/deceitful denialists assert & check out Professor Wieslaw Maslowkski on whose work Gore based his comments. Gore's not a scientist, so why are you being so stupid insinuating that his remarks debunk climate science?
0
0
0
@RondureGyre @TheDisproof @CColose @ChrisMartzWX "if co2 was the most important control knob, mars would be extremely warm" Mar's atmosphere is both very thin & almost entirely composed of CO2, plus solar radiation at that distance is a lot less. Infrared red absorption truly is saturated there even with pressure broadening...
1
0
1