![Jean Philippe Fournier Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1855986710556835840/B4u4w2PL_x96.jpg)
Jean Philippe Fournier
@JeanPFournier
Followers
3K
Following
1K
Statuses
908
Économiste | Fmr Policy advisor to Québec’s Minister of Finance | Free market enthusiast | Canada First, Canada Last, Canada Always | Opinions are my own 🇨🇦
Montréal, Québec
Joined May 2014
This is so embarrassing it’s not even funny anymore we’re straight up frauds
Found out Team Canada's mystery DC broker for meetings is: **Checkmate** When I asked around, no one in DC had heard of them. That’s because they just opened their office 3 months ago, highlighting a young DC based employee that just joined from an online marketing job in December. Their company is actually based in North Carolina. Three things: 1. This doesn’t look right to me for a G7 nation - but I don’t begrudge Checkmate the business they hustled to get from Canada. Good for them. 2. Serious question for Council of Federation: how did Canada end up contracting at $85k/month to a firm as new and young as Checkmate after we’ve been told for months that our feds have ‘deep influence’ in DC? Especially after they gave such a hard time to Premier Smith for meetings they’re now trying desperately to replicate with a broker? 3. This is a poor signal for meetings. DC is a very tough place. Competency matters and so do the advisors you choose. You often only get one shot. - Our reps are going to be meeting with well-informed WH Advisors, Senators, and Governors who - unlike Canadians and our press - know the facts on Canada's decrepit border, law enforcement gaps, growing terror interdictions, lax courts, immigration/asylum fraud, freeloading off US taxpayers for NATO/NORAD, and mercurial foreign affairs. They also know our 69cent dollar and 3x trade exposure make our domestic ‘trade war’ talk hopelessly naive. Those are tough meetings - and performing effectively in them matters on their own terms - and as stepping stones to other, more important meetings. Canada is embarking on a hugely consequential two year phase of negotiations that will re-set the terms of our economic and security relationship with the USA. This is an extraordinary opportunity but fraught with pitfalls. That’s why it has been critical to get Team Canada out of Ottawa and off the CBC - and into DC actually doing the work. But now that they’re there, we have to be dead serious in what we are saying and doing - and who represents us. Or it will be checkmate, indeed. #cdnpoli #melaniejoly
2
4
34
RT @FoodProfessor: On Sunday, I appeared on one of Quebec’s most-watched shows, Tout le monde en parle, to discuss trade, tariffs, and inte…
0
547
0
To loosely translate this into normal people speak and what it could mean for interprovincial trade barriers: pay provinces to reduce barriers, and compensate those who will lose when you yank their privileges away in the name of internal free trade.
If you want to reform rent-seeking arrangements without relying on external shocks or economic crises (e.g. Argentina), compensating those who extract rents can be a politically necessary strategy. Rent-seekers—whether they are businesses benefiting from protectionism, unions securing privileged wages, or bureaucracies expanding their scope—have strong incentives to resist reform. Since their benefits are concentrated while the costs of rent-seeking are diffused across the broader economy, they are often well-organized and politically powerful. The only way out is to take some of the future benefits of reform as compensation to get on another path. Its also why its far more important to have institutions that limit rent-seeking in the first place.
0
0
5
Absolutely, but how much of this collaboration was born out of necessity/incapacity to go at it alone when Canada was a smaller, younger nation?Our lack of “capacity” in the north today is mostly the result of a lack of investment, not because we are fundamentally unable/incapable to exercise our sovereignty. And I don’t believe this was done with a US administration that clearly and loudly contests out claims over the NWT passage. Just cause something in the past doesn’t mean it’s the answer for the future. The point here is that the future will not be like the past - we have to exercise sovereignty and be *able* to do it alone.
1
0
14
@ExnerPirot Yes absolutely but NORAD for the most part keeps the operations of both air forces pretty separate. Also NORAD doesn’t jeopardize our claim over the NWT passage or our sovereignty over such an important area as joint physical bases or patrols in the north would.
2
0
9
RT @maritimelaunch: Great event with @melaniejoly and @halifaxchamber today, discussing opportunities to strengthen 🇨🇦’s defence and econom…
0
20
0
@JP1225170887752 Not sure - but you’re right, and oil tankers from the US midwest already pass through the Seaway to supply the refineries in mtl and NB
1
0
5
@anggglo Yes, but the season is getting longer and the ice is thinning. We’re just about at the stage where we only get 1 meter-ish sea ice that a purpose built tanker could pretty easily go through.
0
0
8