@PatrickQuinnTV
@ATLNewsFirst
I think that when you're having your department chairs arrested, you're liable to really have a long-term problem during your faculty meetings etc.
@WKCRFM
no doubt the call to divest from weapons manufactures and arms dealers was personally offensive to the whole nypd. i agree, nypd is nothing without guns body armor armored vehicles
In 1990 or whatever, Daniel Kahneman discovered that people aren't rational, thus destroying economics, winning the Nobel etc. Dude, you have got to be kidding. It's like discovering up is not down or something.
Identity-based leftism is just going to devour itself. It is, ironically, unable to deal with intersectionality and specifically unable by its own account to represent white women or black men.
@CathyYoung63
@EminaMelonic
I have the notion that
@theatlantic
started out to try to defend and explain Kamala Harris. Inadvertently (?) they're devastating. This is the third (usually, in such a piece, the 'nut' graph).
@Philip_Goff
it’s fine-tuned to *whatever is actual.’ it’s your own *valuing* of life that makes this appear *particularly* improbable. it’s not though, at all.
reading things like this both comforts and disturbs me: it’s a whole big and original system of philosophy, an unbelievable amount of work. and it has just been entirely forgotten.
I've contracted a philosophical crush on Simone de Beauvoir. Her essay "Pyrrhus and Cineas," despite the title, is an amazing summation of existentialism, and drives in many original directions as well. I didn't know it before, though I bet
@Skye_Cleary
did!
The people screaming about Cummings for days on end are...just not my sort of people. Their deepest moral repugnance is directed at rule-breaking, even of a relatively trivial variety. Enrich your moral outlook, k?
What if psychology - clinical, therapeutic, and theoretical - and psychiatry, were reconceived as humanities? It's just obvious that they have more in common with...literary interpretation or art theory or historiography than with physiology or neuroscience per se, for example.
Hey if you think Facebook or Twitter is responsible for any misinformation appearing on their sites, do you think the same about Zoom, for example? If someone somewhere is saying something inaccurate in a Zoom meeting (it's not unlikely), shall we hold the platform responsible?
David Graeber sallied forth into any discipline he needed and into every autonomous zone he could find, and by these means created a unique legacy, but also a model for how to be simultaneously an academic and a human being.
Main headline at the Times now, in huge type: "Harris says US is at inflection point." Post: "Harris accepts historic VP nomination: "We will speak truths."" Couldn't find anything in there with any content or meaning? Headline should have been "Harris intones stock phrases."
I think it's only reasonable to give Trump & co a bit of time to destroy documents, erase hard drives, etc; it's a traditional element of a presidential transition, of course, but might be more time-consuming this time.
Something decent is happening in philosophy, I feel. Agnes Callard, Clancy Martin, John Kaag: these people are actual writers and full-fledged humans. And they do philosophy as though it bears on human questions and matters to them.
I think Western aesthetics can be summarized in four books: two ancient, two modern. Plato, Republic X. Aristotle, Poetics. Kant, Critique of Judgment. Dewey, Art as Experience.
Klobuchar's metaphors are puzzling. "When you see troubled waters, you don't blow up a bridge." "You don't put your money on a number that's not on the wheel." Um, thanks?
Me and my kids Emma, Sam, and Jane, and the woman I married last week and my 98-year-old mother at her bday party on Saturday in Rappahannock County, VA.
This confirms every negative thought I ever had on Kamala. "I just love circles!" Or wallpaper designed to "redefine what power looks like." Art selected by sheer ethnic tokenism. It's too superficial to be superficial. There isn't anything there.
The Nashville blast is truly puzzling: right-wing, left-wing, Islamic, etc: none of them quite make sense. Are there any plausible speculations rolling around Twitter?
The administrators and my colleagues
@DickinsonCol
insist that I not be considered for promotion at all and should retire at associate. 10 books with university presses, a hundred scholarly articles, 1500 citations, nyt wsj etc.
'Cultural Marxism' just isn't the most useful term, but 'woke' will soon be over, 'social justice warrior' has become a term of abuse. I'm taking suggestions for a decently neutral characterization of the newnew left.
One thing that's utterly obvious: our politicians play unbelievably dirty. The oppo research has no limits, no scruples. Don wants the dirt on Hill from the Russians; Hillary's hiring MI6 spies. These people are gross as shit.
Right, it's kind of sad and outrageous that colleges are dropping humanities majors and departments. On the other hand, what has academia done with the humanities in the last, say, 30 years? It used to be wild thinkers and big ideas. Now it's little bitty "professionals."
The basic question of liberalism: How can we make a political hierarchy that rests on violence compatible with our apparent commitment to equality and liberty?
Like if you were serious about the idea that the obligation to obey the law rested on a social contract: well, contracts are abrogated under massive violation by one of the parties.
Notable things about me, author or philosopher-wise. I was writing philosophy in self-help and confessional first-person veins in the early '90s. Few academic philosophers were.
I believe of myself that my academic career was vitiated, over and over, by pc/woke. It's pretty funny because I am no right-winger, in my own opinion. Rather, an eccentric. I feel that's another sort of person who got eliminated, '85-'23.
@RobertTalisse
I figure the candidate is building an ethics course around the students' performance of specific ethical transgressions. Real hands-on pedagogy.
Classical liberalism is beset by a more modest (yet still devastating) version of the contradiction at the heart of Marxist communism: its commitment to equality is incompatible, conceptually and practically, with its statism.
"This masterful work provides a theory of truth, perhaps the only theory of truth according to which it is itself true. And its own theory of truth, according to which it is true, is itself true according to itself."
--Alasdair MacIntyre
It appears to me that Timothy Snyder and...90 other scholars, have been hired by a Ukrainian oligarch to prove that Ukraine is not part of Russia. Now I ask you: is that any way to conduct academic research?
Explanation of police brutality is pretty simple, really. People who have power are disproportionately who seek power. People who seek power are, on average, morally worse than most people.
I used to think not being on the right or the left (or for that matter in the middle) was a good place from which to write opinion. Now it's just completely incomprehensible, as everyone has entrusted or surrendered their beliefs into one collective agent or another.
I feel like it's horrible what we all did to Rachel Dolezal. And you still need to think about why you consider transsexuality de rigueur and and transraciality impossible. There could have been a worthwhile conversation.