@superxtianmario
You are not just marrying a person, you are marrying whatever that person might become. Some people change through marriage and hardships substantially. Cultivate patience to prepare yourselves for the difficulty of loving someone different than you person you married.
Their church was closed for two years, then they were denied access without a mask and not aloud to sing or eat the Body of Christ, then they were denied entrance without passports. But we we “stole” them with “crazy”. Right. Who’s crazy?
Russell Moore: "All over the country...crazy has become a ⛪ growth strategy. Not so much reaching unbelievers but pulling believers out of churches."
Example: unnamed MI ⛪ where pastor (allegedly) said "Covid's a hoax and we're going to fight against masks + vaccine mandates."
Last week my wife suffered a miscarriage. She’s been through so much physically/emotionally that I wanted to say today, on our fifth year anniversary, that I’m so proud of her and I love her very much. She’s not on Twitter so I’m just letting my few friends here know she’s great
@deactkesq
@gavinortlund
If Gavin were saying “whatever the early church believes is true” you’d be right. But that’s not his argument. If someone says “belief X is universal & ancient” we have a right to say “No it’s an accretion and here is the evidence” regardless of whatever else we do/don’t believe
Q: Whom did God elect?
Non-Calvinist: “Only those who believe.”
Q: Whom does the Spirit fill and regenerate?
Non-Calvinist: “Only those who believe.”
Q: For whom did Jesus die?
Non-Calvinist: “For every single person.”
@jpolly22
I don’t know hockey very well, but perhaps the Stars were just too exhausted from the gauntlet. So in a sense, it took all of those teams to knock them out.
Bad exegesis. The entire chapter is a personification of Wisdom. To make it about Mary is the height of blasphemy. For example, this must also be true of her: "From the beginning, and before the world, was I created, and unto the world to come I shall not cease to be..."
Swinging censer at Santiago de Compostela Cathedral in Spain—which has a capacity of 1,200 people. The cathedral has used it since the 11th century. Its size necessitates the use of a rope and pulley system.
@gavinortlund
I’m a surprised to see lumping in vaccine refusal with conspiracies. I think that’s very irresponsible of you. Do you really see a family deciding that the Vax is not the best option for them as being equivalent to embracing Qanon or Antifa?
@redeemed_zoomer
Pretending the Reformed tradition taught that “baptism saves” in the same manner as either the Lutherans or the Roman Catholics is a cope. It’s just not true. It’s trying to anachronistically make them fit into the cool kids club.
“Instead of writing jokes for the audience, we’re writing jokes for a robot with ever-changing standards that can only be identified through painful trial and error as headline after headline gets shot down.”
When a Roman Catholic explains his view of justification, it’s almost never objected to like this: “So I can just discard God’s Law and live however I want to then?!”
When a Protestant explains his view of Justification, we almost always hear that very objection. Here’s the key:
@RCNonsense
When you're more offended by someone denying that Mary was sinless than you are by someone denying that Jesus is God you've got a idolatry problem on your hands.
This is Augustinian anthropology found in both Catholicism and Calvinism and it leads to either illogical paradoxes or logical apathy and even degeneracy.
@rpogrebin
@TheBabylonBee
“Commissioner Adam Silver and President Xi Jinping told us to wear them so we did. I just took this little doily thing from under a table lamp at my mom's house and cut a hole in the middle. Easy."
Four thoughts:
1) “Apostolic Succession” isn’t all it’s chalked up to be. It either gets you an apostate, defected church (Dimon) or a church that welcomes
@JoeBiden
at the Lord’s Supper (Cassman).
@superxtianmario
They will claim us as their derivatives when we do good but won’t take responsibility for any of the bad accusations leveled against us.
3) Galatians 1 is thoroughly Protestant. That every individual has a divine right to reject *any* person, no matter their rank, if the Gospel of the apostles is contradicted flies in the face of Roman C. epistemology which makes the hierarchy in charge over the Gospel.
A syllogism for why infants are not innocent:
P1) Paul teaches human beings have a nature that deserves wrath (Eph. 2:3).
P2) One who deserves wrath is not innocent
P3) Infants are human beings
C1) Infants have a nature that deserves wrath
C2) Infants are not innocent
This is why I’ve always found James 2:24 as a strange shelter for R Catholics. It appears the plain, surface reading doesn’t support *either* of our views. Saying we are justified by infused grace is not the same thing as saying we are justified by faith and works.
STOP HOLDING TO HERETICAL VIEWS ON JUSTIFICATION TO OWN THE PROTS:
“The justice by which the sinner is justified through faith consists formally in the observance of the commandments; it is the justice of works.”
“The justification of a wicked man takes place formally through
4)Dimon won the debate which should terrify Roman Cs. His position obviously leads to Protestantism, EO, or some other non-Roman C kind of Christianity. If his position is true it proves that the church catholic need not be institutional & that papal infallibility is meaningless
#ByWhatStandard
is outstanding. My 3 favorite micdrop moments:
1)
@tomascol
’s “It’s not theological it’s English” line.
2) Nearly all the commentary from Dr.Glenn Sunshine
3) Dr. Gagnon’s joke about incest being something we “whisper” about proven by a lack if annual sermons.
@_matthewpearson
Jason Lisle is one of the few taking on the Distant Starlight problem. Lots of guys in our circle shun him for being a presupper but his actually science is fascinating. He has tons of good YEC resources:
@AverageSc0t
Is the church the nation of Israel? No.
Is the church the covenant people Israel? Yes.
This distinction can r found-among other places-in Romans 9:6, “For not all who are descended from Israel [Jacob/his descendants] belong to Israel [the covenant people of promise].”
2) It’s hard to take Rome’s claim to be the infallible interpreter of Scripture seriously when no one can really know for sure which of her claims are dogmatic nor how to interpret them.
Provisionists are always accusing the Reformed of “reading their systematic into the text.” After dealing with two of them on Romans 8/Hebrews 11 regarding whether or not those without faith can please God, it is painfully clear we are not alone in reading things into the text…
🧵 from Calvin rejecting Baptismal Regeneration from ICC, 4.15.2:
“For [Peter] did not mean to intimate that our ablution and salvation are perfected by water, or that water possesses in itself the virtue of purifying, regenerating, and renewing; nor does he mean that it is the
@5Solas2
He held to Baptismal Regeneration, which you vehemently reject.
By the way, Calvin held to Baptismal Regeneration as well. So did Knox. So did literally all of the Reformers.
@realADRobles
I spent al morning writhing in HATRED for all Chinese people who had the audacity to get the coronavirus! Thankfully this article softened my heart and I no longer despise all the Asians who are getting horribly sick! Thanks ERLC!
@CFBKings
Arizona’s is great in a different context. It’s a great old school logo, but not really a good football logo. The others are absolute masterpieces
Cdl. Burke to
@catholiccom
on obedience: “if your bishop, or the supreme pastor of the Church, is affirming things not in accord with Sacred Tradition/the deposit of the faith, that can’t command your obedience.
You can’t command obedience to do something against faith & morals”
This demonstrates a common circular reasoning. If the church tells you who in history to take seriously, then it’s not the Fathers leading you to the Church but the Church leading you to the Fathers. You must then merely presuppose the true church, not discover it.
@thechurchsplit
The courtroom of men is different than the courtroom of God. Being guilty of sin before God does not entitle humans/the state to murder people. Babies are innocent in the courtroom of men which is why men are not allowed to end their lives.
@catholicpat
Your interpretation of anything is not that thing. Your interpretation of Catholic teaching is not Catholic teaching. So what’s the point?
Since Paul Washer is going around it’s time to share the best impression of him I’ve ever heard. No matter what you think of Paul Washer or
@Jay_D007
this is *objectively* hilarious.
Does
#calvinism
make God the author of evil? William Perkins gives His answer:
"The argument follows not. There be three actions in the will of God, one whereby He doth absolutely will anything and delight in it; and of all such things God Himself is the author.
This is sad. And while I typically don’t kick people when they’re down, I am going to make an exception:
The apologetic for Rome on the basis of unity via the Papacy is an argument on paper alone. It doesn’t exist in real life.
Paul, when explaining his view of justification heard the same objection that Protestants hear, the one that Roman Catholics never hear (Romans 3:31). So the objection ironically becomes an argument FOR our view of justification. Because if we are the ones hearing the same
@thisisfoster
"Em never complained about it once."
An example to follow from Michael Foster: He never speaks negatively in public about his wife. If he says anything about her, it's positive. All of us men should learn this an apply it not just to Twitter, but to all public areas.
@DrJordanBCooper
Being Reformed, I obviously disagree with many of your conclusions. But I don’t see how a LOT of Lutherans don’t owe you a huge apology. There’s no doubt you are in complete continuity with your tradition, and your detractors are not.
@redeemed_zoomer
Calvin and the Reformers did not teach baptismal regeneration I hear this all the time but none of their systematics teach that. They use the language yes, but they define the language in a way consistent with the reformed confessions today.
@TomsDigest
John alone has enough to save: “Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.”
Them: “Mary’s body physically rose to heaven and you’re not a Christian if you think otherwise!”
Us: “Hmm. It’s possible but improbable as there’s really not a lot of biblical or historical evidence for that.”
Them: “WHY DO PROTESTANTS HATE JESUS’ MOM!!!??!!!?”
Us:
@ncswann
Trent’s Papacy is easily one of the most antibiblical, ahistorical doctrines to ever creep into Christendom, and it’s the keystone doctrine of Rome. What about Catholicism are you finding appealing that can’t be found in sacramental traditions like Lutheranism or Anglicanism?
The best case for Catholicism is to just argue in a circle. It’s really easy to discern it’s the one true church if you begin with the assumption that it’s the one true church.
A major difficulty in discerning Catholicism is that it is so often presented as one of several Christian denominations instead of in its historical context as the Church from which the rest departed.
Your prayers have been heard so far. He got done with surgery, and though the hole in his heart was far larger than expected, the surgery went great. Thank you all!
@Daniel_Ross622
You’re right, I don’t think you do get Calvinist theology. That said, aren’t Lutherans Thomists? Meaning, God has an elect that He will persevere? Why didn’t God love your children enough to include them in that group? See, we can all play the game.
Calvin said this about the exegesis/arguments offered by the 7th council fathers:
“In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful to even quote them.” - Calvin
@jonahmsaller
@Pocho_Rican
@catholicindixie
I most definitely don't find the 7th council compatible, having read its definitions, canons, and much of its acts. To be blunt, it's a stain on the Church.
If this truly represents the mindset of early-ish Christianity then it isn't at all difficult to conceive of a doctrine like the Perpetual Virginity being created and growing in popularity.
@jaredcwilson
As the son of a pastor, in a small church plant, I can attest to how often it felt like my mom worked harder than anyone. Full time job, led the music team, and prepped for Sunday school classes. Picked music,slideshows, sang, prepped, taught, worked 40, and took care of family.
@mporeilly
If desiring something for someone that God doesn’t desire for them means we love more, than most people love humanity more than God since God allows sickness. If I could eradicate/prevent all illnesses I would. God can, and yet doesn’t. I love humanity more than God. Right?
objections that Paul heard, then it’s more likely that we are the ones teaching the same doctrine as Paul.
So my loving challenge to my Roman Catholic friends is this: when you teach justification, why does no one ever object to it like this:
After spending the last day getting into the weeds with
#Provisionists
, it’s very sad to me how much our disagreements with them push back beyond soteriology and into theology proper. We simply have very different views of God.
“Documents are not infallible… certain statements within certain documents are infallible.”
What a mess. And there is no infallible list of infallible statements, their own “canon conundrum” if you will.
@ef_hopkins
Steve Gregg is great. I’ve especially appreciated his eschatology stuff. His stuff on Israel, Revelation, and Amillenialism is very good. He’s underrated.
But your thoughts on Sproul are so far off. He was a remarkable teacher and widely read on theologians he disagreed with.
Premise 1) A queen’s husband is a king
Premise 2) Mary is the Queen of Heaven.
Premise 3) Mary’s husband is Joseph
Conclusion: Joseph is the King of Heaven