@WildIrish7227 @HenryBl58377009 @Lawferio If only the algorithm worked that way. It doesn’t. But there’s an easy fix.

@JackMeoff781 This would be my guess.

@CancelWokeness The fact that’s she’s innocent until proven guilty

@WildIrish7227 @HenryBl58377009 @Lawferio Maybe b/c you post about Karen’s weave and photos with AJ- things that are completely irrelevant to the case. Some people just don’t want to see that immaturity. Just speculating

@Yvonne19JSTC @daynajonesmusic @susanevaughn @brooklyn47361 @LTOW227 @soggybamboo @bill_bc3 That’s your opinion. For me, there’s suspicious behavior regardless of what the defense says. Selective memory, conflicting statements, denying knowing people, deleting, orchestrating narrative. I can respect if u say their behavior isn’t enough RD but to flat out deny the sus!!?

@Skippy_45 @luke3wilkinson Wow @Skippy_45. Peaked at your profile & you seem to stand up for all of the right things. Do you think Karen read should be found guilty with all of the reasonable doubt, lack of investigation, and a pitiful DAs office?

@Skippy_45 @luke3wilkinson If that’s true then I lightly revise my statement. I feel badly that no one cared enough to do any good police work and allowed the witnesses to mess things up even further.

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce The harassment is wrong. Period. With that said, I perceived her and many of the other witnesses testimony much differently than you. I don’t think she innocently didn’t remember things. She was calling proctor and visiting Tully. She was remembering perfectly where it suits her

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce One butt dial maybe, but come on. AJ has zero to do with it. He certainly makes it dramatic but I can read it or listen to them on my own and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize they’re not being entirely truthful. For the record I’m against the harassment 100%.

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce That’s has zero relevance to what I’m surmising from what I saw of witnesses testimony. You’re purposely deflecting because you know they’re behavior is fishy

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce maybe that’s the case but if the defense started throwing shade that didn’t makes sense sure. But there was. I’m sorry but I think you’re downplaying it. They were calling the lead LEO, a local cop, the butt dial bullshit, come on now, nobody believes that.

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce But it doesn’t change that we do have it and it needs to be considered. Are we supposed to ignore it because it’s unusual? And it’s on top of odd behavior. Denying who they know. Strange deflection of questions. They just come across to me that they’re hiding something. What?IDK

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce I hope so to. I have no horse in this race other than wanting my state LE and DA offices to hold themselves to a higher standard.

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce Can you admit that there’s a lot of actions by witnesses that are somewhat odd? Controlling? Conflicting?

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce And yes if the CW can enter solid tamper proof evidence of what happened and it’s enough to overcome the suspicious behavior and lack of solid policing then I’m ok to admit that I changed positions.

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce At this point I’m just ignoring the hos long search. Even happening at 6something AM. What I’m referring to is the texts back and forth btwn the mccabes and Alberts. They’re calling proctor, going to Lanks, tell them this, Kerri telling them everything. They’re trying to control

@HenryBl58377009 It doesn’t think anyone in this case feels like the rules apply to them. And as a parents of teen drivers I find it horrific that these adults all felt it was ok to drive around drunk. They should be ashamed of themselves.

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce Did you follow this thread? I’m responding to a very specific photo of text threads. They’re on the record and they’re extremely odd. The mccabes and Alberts were, imo, trying way too hard to control the situation/narrative

@susanevaughn @suspiciousauce Ok but that’s not what I was talking about.