RT @DropMicrodots: The defense called out Jen’s secret meeting in their latest motion, detailing how Commonwealth witnesses were coached in…

RT @DoctorTurtleboy: Michael Morrissey is the elected District Attorney of a county with less than a million people. He's not the King of F…

RT @EstatePlan: @KristinaRex @jaytbones @DoctorTurtleboy @TheNFLanalyst @MbstutzBbbriers Kristina: Do you really have to sit back passively…

Bev is going to be seething reading this motion. Alessi is daring her to contradict herself on the “crucial” requirement of being a medical doctor. That would be clear evidence of Bev’s decisions being arbitrary, which would allow an appellate court to review her decisions de novo and give no deference to the findings of fact she made in the case. In other words, if she allowed this guy to testify and Karen got convicted, Karen would appeal based on Bev’s arbitrary and capricious decision to exclude the eminently more qualified Dr. Renschler based on not being a medical doctor while allowing this non-medical doctor to testify about the exact same issue - injury causation. The arbitrary nature of Bev’s decision would then allow the appellate court to reexamine the underlying facts related to the string of horrible decisions Bev made that turned this case into the dumpster fire it is. Your call, Bev!

RT @OliviaLambo_: In the SJC #KarenRead decision, they’re essentially saying that issues where potential racial bias may have impacted a ju…

RT @DoctorTurtleboy: The Commonwealth coached John O'Keefe's 11 year old nephew to lie about an incident involving steak tips, and then got…

RT @DropMicrodots: Like a shark sensing blood, once you catch on to the Commonwealth’s cover-up of Officer John O’Keefe’s murder and their…

RT @amuse: LAWFARE: Allowing a single district court judge have more power than the President of the United States is a perversion of justi…

@CoffindafferFBI Are you saying Karen Read paid the ARCCA experts? Do you know that to be true?

I'll take a stab at this. If Karen got convicted it wouldn't prevent Proctor, the McAlberts, Lally and Morrissey from getting indicted by the DOJ, but it would give them a much stronger defense than “we still think Karen did it even though we spent a bazillion dollars trying to convince a jury and they still didn't buy it.” These are people who know how to manipulate the system. They don’t think in absolutes, because it’s not about who’s actually guilty vs. innocent. It’s about how the process can be manipulated to achieve the least undesirable result for themselves. On an average day, every MSP Trooper knows if they get caught breaking the rules, they can hunker down until the story in the Herald blows over, wait out a fake investigation, then get rehired, rehomed at another agency, or retire with a pension. In this situation, Proctor, the McAlberts and Lally/Morrissey know the federal investigation might continue after Karen is acquitted. Remember, if they get indicted it won’t be for murder. It will be for framing Karen to cover up who killed JO. So what's their game plan? SUMMARY: 👉Fabricate and gather evidence to maximize their leverage in potential plea negotiations with the DOJ, and give themselves the best chance of an acquittal or hung jury if they have to go to trial. DISCUSSION: They’re planning to lawyer up and issue statements saying "we followed the evidence, and it pointed to Karen Read. The jury agreed with us. Now we will 'let the process play out,' and it will prove we are innocent." That "process" will start with filing discovery motions for two things - (1) inculpatory evidence the feds have against them, and (2) potentially "exculpatory" evidence to support their their defense theory. What's their defense theory? 👉Sure, those text messages look bad and the investigation was a little sloppy, but the investigation was still legit, and being mean to Karen and bad at our jobs isn't a crime. The reason it looks bad is because (i) Karen's attorneys raised "specious issues of a third party culprit and complaints of witness and police misconduct" and "were the source of the initial complaint and allegations prompting [the investigation] by the U.S. Attorney's Office," (ii) Rachel Rollins "weaponized the United States Attorney's Office to conduct an unprecedented intervention into an open state murder investigation" on behalf of Karen's attorneys because Rachel dislikes Michael Morrissey, and (iii) the chief of the DOJ's public corruption unit, Dustin Chao, is running the investigation and framing the Norfolk District Attorney's Office because Morrissey fired his wife, Lauren Chao, back in 2015. It sounds ridiculous, but they probably think they can get at least one or two "back the blue" people onto the jury through voir dire who won't vote to convict unless there's a smoking gun. They're probably right, as we saw with Judge Bev's "randomly" hand-picked jury foreman, which is why they spent so much time trying to find out what the feds know once the investigation was revealed. Morrissey begged the DOJ for info, tried to get the investigation squashed, and tried to force journalists to disclose off-the-record comments Karen made during interviews. THAT is what a fishing expedition looks like. And when that didn't work, he had Tully conspire with the Fake Victim to charge @DoctorTurtleboy with witness intimidation and try to loop in Karen with a conspiracy charge so they could get their phones and find out what they knew about the federal investigation. IT'S RIGHT THERE IN MORRISSEY'S LETTERS: Morrissey has been working on this defense since the moment two of the McAlberts got subpoenas for the federal grand jury and immediately told Morrissey about it at the end of April in 2023. TIMELINE SHOWING MORRISSEY'S REACTION TO THE FEDERAL INVESTIGATION & EFFORTS TO BUILD A DEFENSE FOR POTENTIAL INDICTMENT: 2/2/23: NDAO discloses Jen McCabe's phone extraction 2/8/23: NDAO discloses JO's phone extraction 2/17/23: Alberts accept an offer for 34 Fairview for $44,000 under asking 4/12/23: AJ files motion about JM's "Hos long to die in cold" Google Search and extensive relationship between Alberts, McCabes and Proctors. -Turtleboy starts writing about the Karen Read case End of April, 23: Two witnesses receive federal grand jury subpoenas and immediately tell NDAO 1st week of May, 23: Lynn Beland (NDAO) calls Josh Levy May 8, 2023: Beland letter to Levy requesting (i) all statements of witnesses to the investigation of the death of John O'Keefe, and resulting prosecution, including both statements of investigators and grand jury minutes;" and (ii) all information relating to "any investigations into misconduct related to professional duties" of the "witnesses and/or members of the prosecution." May 8 - May 16, 2023: Morrisey starts personally coming up with an argument to stop the DOJ investigation. His initial argument is that AUSA Dustin Chao is trying to frame him because he fired Chao's wife in 2015. May 17, 2023: DOJ Office of Inspector General publishes a report about Rachel Rollins. The report is 150 pages long. May 18, 2023: Morrisey's letter to the DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility asking them examine Josh Levy's investigation. Morrissey says he "began composing this letter well before the May 17, 2023 publication of the" DOJ's report on Rollins. Read the letter and think about this. The Rollins report was released on May 17th, and within 24 hours Morrissey was citing info on pages 46, 66, 69 and 70 of the report about Rollins "weaponizing" her office. The conflict of interest/bias argument about AUSA Chao was a little weak because Levy wasn't directly connected to Chao. The Rollins Report made that connection, because now he could say the head of the entire office was biased against him, implying that Rollins was in cahoots with Chao to get back at him. So Morrissey adds a couple paragraphs about Rollins to the draft of his letter, and he fires it off to the DOJ on May 18th while the story is in the news and they might feel pressure to shut Levy down. May 2023: Caitlin Albert testifies to federal GJ (still not questioned by Proctor) June 1, 2023: DOJ OPR letter to Morrissey replying to his request to remove Levy saying, "wrong office, contact Jay Macklin." June 9, 2023: NCDO files a motion for a gag order to prevent Karen's attorneys from disclosing: -any information that could materially prejudice "potential trial jurors or witnesses" or heighten public condemnation of "the accused or law enforcement." (How could jurors be prejudiced? Why would Karen's attorneys prejudice "the accused?" Just say you don't want them to be allowed to tell anyone about the info they're going to get from the feds showing the "witnesses" conspired with law enforcement to frame her) -the results of forensic testing (that the feds might provide) -the existence of the federal investigation into the actions of the Commonwealth's witnesses June 12, 2023: Levy's letter to Lynn Beland saying he received her May 9th letter begging for the federal grand jury testimony and whatever info they had from investigating NDAO/MSP misconduct. Levy completely ignores that request and says, "we understand your office has important discovery obligations in any criminal prosecution. At this juncture, we have no issue with you advising defense counsel about the contact we have had with your office and the information we have shared if you determine such a disclosure is warranted under Mass. R. Crim. 14." In other words, "ya we're investigating your office for misconduct, and you guys have some balls pretending to care about your discovery obligations to Karen. Let's see if you tell her about these letters." June 20, 2023: Judge Bev denies Karen's Rule 17 motion for Brian Albert and Jen McCabe's phone records June 21, 2023: Lynn Beland writes to EOUSA Jay Macklin asking for a status update on Morrissey's "request for a transfer of investigation due to a conflict of interest." July 2023: Lally stalls on providing DNA test results, JO's clothing, and taillight pieces, blaming delay on lab protocols July 24, 2023: Bukhenik interviews Jen McCabe and she claims she is "concerned for her safety and wellbeing of her juvenile children" due to Turtleboy's journalism July 24, 2023: Lally files motion to compel Yanetti to produce a privilege log so they can go through Karen's phone data (which they had already gone through...) August 3, 2023: EOUSA General Counsel Jay Macklin's letter to Lynn Beland saying, "ya, so I talked to Levy about Morrissey's letter where he claimed the facts and evidence show that Karen hit John with her vehicle and left him to die in the snow, and that there's no evidence of a third party culprit or police misconduct. Josh and his team have a ton of evidence and they have a "very different opinion of the circumstances in this case than as presented in Mr. Morrissey's letter," so "we see no basis for a recusal in this investigation." Notice that he doesn't even bother commenting on Rollins. His focus is on the "circumstances in this case," which are different from what Morrissey claims, and "they believe it is essential to continue their investigation given the information of which they are aware." August 25, 2023: After Morrissey's attempt to stop the DOJ investigation fails, he posts his infamous Youtube video claiming Karen is guilty, that there is no evidence of a personal relationship between Proctor and the McAlberts, and that there is no evidence of police misconduct. In other words, exactly what the DOJ just told him they completely disagreed with. [Keep in mind right here that Karen's SJC appeal was still pending for JM and BA's phone records, so Morrissey/McAlberts were racing the clock) October 11, 2023: Tully files an application for an arrest warrant and a criminal complaint against @DoctorTurtleboy for witness intimidation - without notice of a show cause hearing so they could arrest him in front of his kids (aka actual intimidation). October 11, 2023: Tully files a separate application for criminal complaint against @DoctorTurtleboy for a "new arrest" for "conspiracy." (The simultaneous "new arrest" thing is a little trick police use to get complaints issued without show cause hearings) The purpose of this was obviously to try and loop Karen into the witness intimidation charge, get her bail revoked, and get their phone records to see what they knew about the federal investigation. November 15, 2023: SJC orders production of Jen McCabe's phone records for "hos long to die in cold" December 4, 2023: Morrissey finally tells defense about his letters with the DOJ regarding the federal investigation (6 months after Levy said he could/should disclose to defense) December 20, 2023: @DoctorTurtleboy's WI case gets indicted and moved into Superior Court. December 22, 2023: Turtleboy gets arraigned in Superior Court December 26, 2023: Fake Victim's A&B & WI complaints get filed in Stoughton District Court, and Mello files a motion to revoke Aidan's bail *for 90 days* on the existing WI case that he got arraigned for 4 days earlier. ***This would have kept Aidan in jail until 2 weeks after Karen's original trial date on 3/12/24*** Seems intentional. Bradl had to appeal this to the SJC February 21, 2024: Aidan's pretrial detention changed from 90 days to 60 days based on Bradl's win at the SJC. February 23, 2024: Mello/Cosgrove file a nolle prosequi dropping the A&B charge (misdemeanor) February 26, 2024: Fake Victim shows up to Karen's hearing and reports Aidan for a 209A violation. February 27, 2024: Dedham Clerk issues a criminal complaint against Aidan for the alleged 209A violation. Clerk issues the complaint without giving Aidan notice and a show cause hearing without stating the justification for depriving him of a show cause hearing. Arraignment hearing scheduled for 3/14. March 5, 2024: Karen's 3/12/24 trial date gets changed to a hearing on Karen's Motion to Dismiss/Sanctions and Disqualification. First trial date rescheduled to April 16th. March 14, 2024: At Aidan's arraignment hearing, Mello requests a dangerousness hearing and motions to revoke Aidan's bail for 120 days (aka until Karen's trial is over). Motion denied. Next hearing scheduled for 4/26/23 (after start of Karen's trial). April 16, 2024: Karen's circus trial starts May 10, 2024: Lally files a motion to get Aidan kicked out of the trial without notifying Bradl, but Bradl happens to be in court and smokes Lally. CONCLUSION: Anyways, didn't mean to get that in depth but...this timeline makes it abundantly clear that Michael Morrissey started panicking when he found out the feds were investigating him and his cronies for framing Karen, so he immediately went into "defense attorney mode" and started building a defense for himself, Lally, Proctor and the McAlberts for when they eventually get indicted; and his strategy was to claim they did nothing wrong and the reason they got indicted is because there's a grand conspiracy between Karen, defense attorneys, the DOJ, the FBI, a journalist called Turtleboy, rubber duckie enthusiasts, handsome genius nerds who use real-life science and get hired by the FBI, the military, and the NHL to do awesome stuff; and the head of the DOJ's public corruption unit and his wife, all because Rachel Rollins vaguely insinuated that Michael Morrissey was sexist and possibly racist a while back, and David Yanetti asked her to frame him to help Karen beat a murder charge. Please remember that next time the AntiKR trolls say Karen's defense is a crazy conspiracy because there's no way a close-knit police family and their cop friends who live down the street would ever cover up a crime together. It's the most absurd level of projection and gaslighting I've ever seen, and it's just sad how many people in Massachusetts just shrug it off and do nothing about it. (I'll probably post the docs I referenced in the comments later)

RT @KYMaverick1: When the law is perceived as unjust and conflicts with common sense, it presents an opportunity for legal reform. Unfortun…

RT @DeannaCorby: Imagine jurors coming forward to express their desire to communicate something to the system, yet not a single juror objec…

RT @calendula_3: No, I can't get behind opinions like James Hibberd's, of The Hollywood Reporter, who say both sides are probably terrible,…

RT @MikeBenzCyber: if you think the “independent media” scam is bad, the “independent judiciary” scam is even worse — corrupted media can s…

RT @LeftismForU: Logically, why would anyone be against government spending being exposed? Do you all not want to know where your taxpayer…

RT @DropMicrodots: Trooper Proctor, anxiously awaiting the verdict in the first trial, texted Adam Lally that they were all on edge. So muc…

Not even remotely suspicious when a cop is accused of framing a woman with the DA’s help and texts the ADA that he’s nervous about the verdict

Juror in Karen Read case comes out swinging at SJC after its absurd decision today

RT @KashPatel_News: This is how corrupt politicians are: Nancy Pelosi Annual salary: $223,000 Net worth: $202 million Mitch McConnell An…

This sums up the Massachusetts justice system. 1. The court makes a bad decision 2. You immediately ask the court to fix it 3. The court takes 7 months to make a decision 4. The court tells you they can't fix it because too much time has passed now.