Welcome kits are now available via @warpdotgreen! Base and Ethereum users can now effectively bridge assets to Chia without needing a pre-funded XCH wallet. The welcome kit covers the offer needed to complete bridging, and includes 0.00042 extra XCH to be sent to the user's wallet (can be spent as they see fit). To be eligible for a welcome kit, a bridge transaction needs to meet the following criteria: - Destination: Chia - Assets and minimum amounts: 10 milliETH (0.01 ETH) or 42 USDC or 42 USDT or 0.1 XCH - Receiver address on Chia has a balance < 0.01 XCH Welcome kits are paid for by myself and subject to availability. If one is available, the UI will reflect it via a notification:

Cool detail about @warpdotgreen welcome kits: they are powered by a 'smart' single-address wallet. The wallet not only manages its coins but also tracks pending bridging operations eligible to receive welcome kits. The wallet can generate multiple offers simultaneously, ensuring that accepting one kit doesn't cancel the others since they use different source coins. Moreover, the wallet auto-splits big coins with every accepted welcome kit. Normally, one-sided offers are 'insecure' since anyone having access to them can claim the offered funds. The wallet, however, has a custom driver that ensures that: a) funds are sent directly to the bridging operation recipient no matter what, not the person accepting the welcome kit offer b) the offer can only be accepted at the same time that the bridging operation completes (it asserts the corresponding message coin is created and spent in the same block) Unlike normal one-sided offers, welcome kit offers can be posted publicly. And they are - you can find the open ones here: The API took ~1 day to build and debug thanks to chia-wallet-sdk (Rust ftw) and great design of both the offers primitive and the bridge.

gm

@AMAZlNGNATURE @Toucan987

gm

@Sir_CapitaliSt @hoffmang who will determine if something is true or not?

@shaneo_257 gm

gm

@shaneo_257 gm

@Sir_CapitaliSt 42 or 69

gm

@shaneo_257 gm

@dexie_space @SD7206 @endertown @XCH_Caesar @seedsnapp @hadamcik @Rigidity16 @Dkackman @TibetSwap I think you have some errors in your fee calculations in that case

@SD7206 @endertown @XCH_Caesar @seedsnapp @hadamcik @Rigidity16 @Dkackman @dexie_space @TibetSwap you can't avoid the 0.7% LP fee for TibetSwap so, if your whole trade goes through TibetSwap, Dexie's fee would be ~1% + 0.7% while TibetSwap's ~0.7% + 0.7%.

gm

@shaneo_257 gm

@fizpawiz @hoffmang @Rigidity16 @Lucky8Token @digdotnet I said 2 years, which gives me a couple more months 🤣

RT @SlowestTimelord: @yakuh1t0 @hoffmang @Rigidity16 @Lucky8Token @digdotnet I think you can handle it

@hoffmang @Rigidity16 @Lucky8Token @digdotnet gimme 100 XCH and ~2 years and I'll see what I can do