Lord Wuphat Profile
Lord Wuphat

@wuphat1

Followers
146
Following
44
Media
2,221
Statuses
11,977

100% human. Fair warning, if you DM me with hate, I will absolutely share it with the public.

Joined June 2022
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
Hey, dipshit. Amber didn't win in the UK. The Sun did. Amber lied in the UK and was believed. She tried it again in the US and was exposed. But you already know that.
@Eve_Barlow
Eve Barlow
2 years
When Amber won in the UK v little changed. Petitions to have her fired from Aquaman 2 continued to gain traction. The social media trolling got worse. In the three months since Depp won in the US. he went on tour, released an album, landed a role, and was invited to the VMAs.
1
158
1K
10
39
550
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
A lot of people have asked why I am worried about the misandry surrounding the Michele Dauber response to the JD/AH *defamation* case. The reason is that irresponsible tenuring at @StanfordLaw has incentivized hatred and harassment online and IRL @TwitterSupport
Tweet media one
33
76
477
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@lesliebooks 1. The $10M were for damages he sustained to reputational loss. It was not "a fine". 2. She was "fined" $5M (reduced by statute to $350K) for malicious defamation. This means that the jury found that she lied, and that she knew they were lies when she wrote them. So, yes
2
15
307
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
Reading the dirt in #unsealed documents and it's very clear why #AmberHeardIsAMonster didn't want this stuff out Judge A showed a lot of restraint keeping the hearsay out and keeping it sealed until after the jury found that #AmberHeardIsALiar Can't wait for the failed appeal
3
40
279
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@Eve_Barlow @billmaher You've been tweeting about ED and limp dicks. Don't pretend to be above the fray, hypocrite
6
3
250
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@MsMagazine And what did he come.back from? Being falsely accused of abusing his former spouse. If she hadn't lied about him in the first place, there would be no reason for him to make a comeback. What part of that did you miss in this whole sequence of events?
0
8
253
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
So, let me get this straight... @kattenbarge goes nuclear on a 96 year old woman, forcing herself into crisis management mode, and *coincidentally* @k4mil1aa just *happens* to reappear on the same day, and.we're supposed to accept there's no connection.
9
21
219
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
5 months
@jk_rowling @MinnOrchia Pretending to *know* what other people are when they are telling you otherwise is the epitome of hubris and conceit. Be better. Do better.
250
1
178
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@real_nige No, please post the entire quote repeatedly. It is likely that quote that sealed her fate in the eyes of the jury Make no mistake, at every step of the way, she and her team did more damage to her case than anything JD and his team could have done She was her own worst witness
3
1
150
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@kattenbarge Translation: "Why are my posts being scrutinized after all I've done is collaborated with Twitter accounts known for spreading misinformation and trying to pass that off a legitimate news? Is it that I've lost what little credibility I've had? No, surely it's them not me."
1
5
148
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@Angenette5 100% intentional. As we all know, Ben Chew is a snarky guy. It's even in the court records
1
3
140
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@DrProudman You could have stopped at "I don't understand" and it would have been your most honest tweet ever.
2
0
125
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@kattenbarge Like right here, you use this video as an example of correcting the narrative, but it, itself, isn't correct No one paid to unseal docs. They were unsealed already, available for anyone. People paid to have copies of them You've been previously corrected but still run with it
5
2
128
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@LillyJane916 The good thing is, you know damn well Camille and Ben will be all over this and cite it in their rebuttal. They have all the receipts
2
1
121
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@mldauber @Tan_ter_M *Couldn't care less. That's what you're looking for. "Could care less" means they could, in fact, care less than they currently do, which implies that they care at least a little bit, "professor"
2
2
119
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@DrProudman When did this happen? I am unaware of any "live-streamed sexual violence trial" happening. Can you provide a citation? Surely a competent barrister such as yourself could cite the case, at least.
2
0
119
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@karma4amber Came to walk the dog, but see the job's been done. How embarrassing for you to be caught in such a lie.
0
0
111
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@ThatUmbrella If you have to lie and manipulate the evidence to fit your narrative, then the narrative is flawed. This has been a constant theme from Team AH.
1
4
109
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@BattynattyK @zoectjones @NoahShachtman @RollingStone @BotSentinel This ignores that many of these so called harmful videos have been reported by people who find fault with the content only for YT to review them and find nothing against the TOS. People confuse "shit I don't like" for harassment.
5
3
111
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
Correct. We are not talking about abuse. We're talking about somebody who lied about abuse. That deserves ridicule all day long.
2
13
105
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@TheDUIGuyPlus Seems a day late and a dollar short to me. The rules were pretty clear that the brief needed to be in *before* the appeal was filed and this amended portion is clearly *after*
0
4
100
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
10 months
Tweet media one
1
2
99
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@FemCondition Can't wait to see the hoops LeaveHeardAlone (I won't dignify her with an @) jumps thru to spin this Her position has been that the alleged victim is to be protected by no cameras, but it's clear AH was fine with levying the charge to embarrass unchallenged Same w/therapy notes
2
0
102
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@danibannani7777 I had no idea they changed the name to "Mera" Here I thought it was Jason Momoa's "Aquaman." Almost as if he was the star and titular character. They could replace Heard as Mera with a dozen other actors who would have actual chemistry and wouldn't act like a matchstick
1
5
94
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@DrJessTaylor @Eve_Barlow Now she can do what she claims she wanted to do and move on with her life. She has absolutely no reason to speak about him ever again. That chapter of her life is over. But I guarantee she won't let it rest. Because she was the instigator the whole time. She can't stand to lose
3
1
100
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@TerrryParker Vanessa to Amber
2
1
94
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@CasablancasGrl @An_elf_pirate That's nothing to the $200M movie she's ruining
1
0
92
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@LeeBerlik Strange. I could have sworn that this was argued before a jury and they decided otherwise. As an attorney, you do know that the Appellate Court is not a venue for re-litigation, don't you? Don't you?
1
1
85
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@cellyszn20 @FemCondition Someone tried. This was her response.
Tweet media one
13
7
85
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
9 months
@RogerAQuilliam @StandTrue Fetuses are parasitic. Babies are not. These are two different things.
0
0
80
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@IndiaWilloughby That is a neat trick. How does someone who has never had a Twitter account send a Tweet?
2
2
86
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@Eve_Barlow Too soon? No Too stupid? Yes Too unoriginal? Yes Too overplayed? Yes Too petty? Yes Too thirsty? Yes Now, carry Amber's bags and cut up her meat like a good House Elf.
@Eve_Barlow
Eve Barlow
2 years
Depp fans keep commenting on my posts saying that I have a dick and not a vagina. I don’t but if I did at least it would work. (Too soon?)
4
34
439
1
5
85
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@movieweb She's not the *only* reason the movie will flop, but she's definitely one of the reasons.
0
0
85
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@PiersUncensored @Eve_Barlow @piersmorgan @FamilyLawGuruUK Why should they be treated equally? She was demonstrably the instigator and abuser, and then lied about it. She got caught. She doesn't deserve to be treated equally. That's the consequences of her actions. She should have thought about that before she did all those things
1
3
85
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
5 months
@MeltzerSaidWhat Straight up calling Tony Khan a mark
2
0
81
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@ethanstarot @dickwarlock13 They've lost the argument on all the facts regarding the case, so they only have insults left. It's the only weapon they have left
1
3
75
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@LauraBockov She forgot to mention complaining about her late sushi delivery while children were dying
0
0
78
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@Paris2804 @ThatsABlackbird @LauraBockov She could be extradited and convicted and they would still deny it, clinging to their setup conspiracy while blaming JD.
1
1
75
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
How do you know he hasn't donated it? What part of the settlement announcement made you think he'd let you know when it happens? What makes you think he'll make it public at all? Who the fuck are you that you think you're even entitled to know?
@Tldj1212
Tracy Johnson
1 year
@ZingerMagazine @h_lalahart Depp was supposed to donate that million dollar insurance payout but so far he hasn’t donate a dime. It’s just another lie by a drug addict. Depp should be criminally investigated for fraud.
2
3
8
10
2
77
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@ryancbeard You're operating under a flawed premise. She was the aggressor. There is no evidence that he actually abused her, only her allegations. Yet we know that she initiated violence with him from her own testimony. The jury got it right. Your best bet is to just watch the trial
0
2
75
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@stirgussa Please. He made it very clear that the only way they could have aired the video without repercussion is if the copyright owner sent it to them. She was clearly the copyright owner since she took the video. Bury your head in the sand all you like, she sent it to them
4
1
74
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
8 months
@WBG84 @ChrisTrapasso Hard pass. They're not getting 3 ones, a two and 4, plus a player to move four spots.
16
0
74
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@kattenbarge @dches91 Given your track history of biased reporting and reliance on misinformation WRT to all things Depp/Heard...
1
1
67
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@MarlowNYC @LauraBockov This is a blatant ad hominem attack and appeal to authority. Why don't you go.after the substance of the argument instead of the person? As a journalist, you're getting outperformed by someone you claim is not a journalist. That must be terribly embarrassing for you.
0
1
69
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@Jessicafrndz Response? You started the conversation. The response is what you got. Nothing you can say, outside of a sincere apology accepting full responsibility, can make you look better, and you don't need a few days to apologize. This will not go well for you.
4
1
68
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@LauraBockov @TMZ Imagine that. I'm sure Barlow and Dauber and the rest of the cult will happily line up and offer their apologies as quickly and loudly as their disparagement.
5
1
66
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@sophia_71_ She is not being harassed. She is being held accountable. Huge difference.
1
2
66
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
0
4
64
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@ederahasstarted HBC has been stunning her entire career. AH will be a plastic surgery disaster by the time she's HBC's current age. Ugly's to the bone
0
0
63
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@Beatrix32021692 @LauraBockov She uses "dealing with legal" and "feeding her lawyers doctored Instagram posts" synonymously
1
1
65
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@DrProudman You, as a barrister, know damn well why. This is a blatantly bad faith question In order to ensure that all evidence is presented to the appellate court, he has to appeal in kind You know this We know you know this You are deceitful You know that, too And so do we Liar
1
3
61
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@DrProudman Most people don't have a problem with feminists who are striving for equality What they do have a problem with is misandrists masquerading as feminists But you, conveniently, deny the existence of misandry despite your public actions and posts revealing you to be one
3
1
58
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@kattenbarge @SecretSquizzer You have a job. Cool. Your next goal should be becoming competent. I was going to say good, but I find it's best to manage expectations and set attainable goals for poor performers.
2
2
59
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@kattenbarge @Ms_A_Turd You use "doxxing" and "spreading lies and conspiracy theories about an employee of the public relations firm that works with Amber Heard" synonymously. We get it.
1
3
56
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@javierayvoce @TheDUIGuyPlus You should.probably take your own advice before expecting it of others. Your TL is full of evidence that you are "milking" the same topic. The word for that is hypocrisy.
1
0
59
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@TheCut 1.4M followers 7 likes 2 RTs If that doesn't scream "This account pays for followers" IDK what does.
2
1
58
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
Hey all, If you want to turn the screw to @Eve_Barlow a little more, go give this user a follow. Maybe some help from: @dickwarlock13 @danblock4 Tag anyone else you think might be able to help.
@TattooLover00
TattooLover
2 years
@stirgussa @Eve_Barlow Be quiet no body cares what you have to say! You support a mental case who is a liar and deep down you know it!
11
15
164
4
10
55
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@DrProudman JFC. No! The records were already unsealed. The crowdfunding was to get copies available for *everyone* to see.
1
0
55
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
9 months
@FightMate The only thing worse than a cop is a wannabe cop
4
0
52
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@HlTCHANNIE Gladly. When the evidence supports her narrative. At present it does not.
1
0
54
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@kattenbarge @MizzRothko So you haven't actually looked at them yourself. Kinda like the trial. Stellar investigative journalism. Almost as good as that hack Marlow at Daily Beast.
2
1
55
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
9 months
@RogerAQuilliam @StandTrue You said baby. Babies live outside of the womb. Fetuses are what live in the womb and require the resources of the host body to survive. That's a parasitic relationship.
0
0
51
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@wonkamatters @FemCondition It's not a problem. They're manufacturing a controversy because all of their other objections have been so thoroughly refuted that the smarter ones among them know not to use them. It's the same tactic creationists use to deny evolution.
3
2
51
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@femmeheard Undefeated except for when she was defeated in court.
0
1
53
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
9 months
@Okey_Ego_Crypto @FightMate Respect is earned by behavior, not age.
0
3
52
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@pay95877022 @LauraBockov I doesn't. The point is that Elaine complained in her motion RE: J15 that they were limited in what they could ask during voir dire, and it seems that the reason for that was at her suggestion. She created the problem and then cried foul when it served her purpose later
1
1
53
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@Jessicafrndz @mevvybear No. Your content was to shame someone. And you got called.out for it and now you're backpedaling.
1
1
55
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@segueopercurso @CourtTV @ChanleyCourtTV Try to keep up. Her appeal specifically calls into question the Judges' credibility and integrity. It's not the fact that she's appealing that's disrespectful, it's the contents of that appeal which are, in part, disrespectful. Don't be obtuse.
0
2
51
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@Eve_Barlow You can still get out. Escape the cult of Heard. Spill the tea. Everyone loves a redemption arc.
2
1
53
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@lesliebooks You are the fuel the gaslighters are using to try and rewrite history.
1
1
52
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@real_nige You know that the YouTube algorithm feeds you content based on your watch history, right? I don't get fed Dallas Cowboys videos, because I don't watch them, so the algorithm knows not to suggest them If you're getting Camille vids suggested, it's because you're watching them
3
0
50
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@Eve_Barlow @TeinyshaP @stirgussa In what world does the number of followers have any bearing on the substance of an argument?
2
1
51
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@facetiousfemale Hearsay is a statement made outside of court. The reason why it's problematic is that it can't be cross-examined. Cross-examination is a critical element to the verification element she references. Her lawyer wife should have explained this to her already
0
2
48
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@LumberLaw He never responded to her protective order. It was dismissed with prejudice. This brief has nothing to do with the protective order. This case had nothing to do with protective order. What the hell is she talking about?
1
0
48
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@An_elf_pirate Using Kat's logic, these allegations must be taken on face as true. She would have actors and comedians stripped of their roles pending said investigation, and place the burden on them to clear their names. We should expect the same of her.
1
2
47
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@TheDUIGuyPlus She's been threatening that for months. I'll believe it when I see it
1
1
49
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@MarlowNYC This "journalist" is a hack.
1
0
47
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@AngelaBelcamino @elonmusk Insisting that people say "Happy Holidays" is no different than people who insist you say "Merry Christmas" You greet people however you please, as they can do the same. Being offended by *how* someone wishes you well is asinine no matter the greeting or the greeter.
4
4
48
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@DailyMail When has she ever STFU?
0
0
46
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@RED_ABYSS__ So she acknowledges that there is a difference between pledge and donate now.
3
0
44
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@femmeheard In the long run, it doesn't really matter which celebrities back up who. Their opinions are irrelevant. The only opinions that mattered were the 7 jurors that determined that she defamed him with malice. Nothing changes that. Her appeal will fail. The judgement will stand.
2
4
43
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@deardrewdixon @SavageXFenty @rihanna I'm a progressive leftist and I support him because he was obviously the victim. You'd know this if you'd watched the trial instead of relying on corporate media to feed you lies.
2
2
46
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@_haaniyah_ No. We witnessed a liar get held accountable for fabricating allegations of abuse when the evidence suggests that she was the instigator and aggressor.
2
1
43
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@RollingStone She dared Depp to tell a judge. She dared him to tell the world. She demanded a trial by jury. She testified that the jury should go see for themselves despite the court order forbidding them to do so. She has no one to blame but herself. Stop covering for her deceit.
2
2
47
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@Eve_Barlow @mculokii She should have thought of that 6 years ago before her lies snowballed into the avalanche that crushed her.
1
0
45
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@cora_melodie_ "I didn't punch you, by the way. I'm sorry I didn't hit you across the face in a proper slap. I was hitting you, it was not punching you. Babe, you're not punched." --Also Amber Heard
1
0
44
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
Lol @ LHA throwing herself a pity party
Tweet media one
15
2
43
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@TerrryParker @kattenbarge Right? I think the idea of a monarchy is antiquated and should be cast aside, but FFS, it's a 96 year old woman meeting the inevitable. Kat should be so lucky to be remembered enough that anyone would even bother to write a joke this shitty when her time comes.
4
2
44
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@OceanLo67005989 "I didn't punch you, by the way. I'm sorry I didn't hit you across the face in a proper slap. I was hitting you, it was not punching you. Babe, you're not punched." -Defamer Amber Heard to abuse victim Johnny Depp
3
1
42
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@LeeBerlik The Op-Ed restates the defamation. It was published in Dec 2018. He sued in Mar of 2019. Well.within the 2 year SOL. Which pretty much makes your silly argument SOL, as well.
5
2
45
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@DrJessTaylor @mldauber @washingtonpost The fact that you're on here pimping Dauber and complaining about online hate without a hint of irony with regard to the venom she spews daily is very telling. You either agree with her brand of hatred or you're really not paying attention. You pick
1
2
42
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@stirgussa It's behind a paywall, but I'll summarize: Bitter artist doesn't like that famous people also indulge in art and sell their pieces claiming that by doing so, people.don't buy other artists' work.
5
1
43
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@k1llacourt @cocainecross Double Jeopardy pertains to criminal cases. It has nothing to do with civil cases. You have no idea what you're talking about. You are just repeating bullshit you heard from other people
0
0
44
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 months
@eqx00 @Corey_Comper @TheBabylonBee So are.all the people making fun of him now, right. It's just jokes, so it's all cool, right?
1
0
40
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
1 year
@LauraBockov Can't wait to see how LHA and the rest of the clown show spins this into a win for AH.
2
1
43
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@stirgussa @Eve_Barlow You all come across the same as sports fans whose team lost in its championship game because you think the official blew a call, but in reality, you just don't understand the rules
1
0
41
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@StepOnThemQuee1 You have it backwards. Amber betrayed all of them. It's who she is. And her current band of hangers-on are just the next in line to be left behind.
0
0
42
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@kapo0ow @kattenbarge Which we already know Kat did not.
0
0
41
@wuphat1
Lord Wuphat
2 years
@THISlSVOIDED @DEADLINE You have nothing to worry about. There will not be a new trial
0
0
40