Actions express priorities.

RT @walterkirn: Shouldn't have murdered that squirrel.

RT @Cernovich: For all of you left-wing moralists and holier than thou USAID supporters trying to manipulate us. USAID gives grants to "no…

😂

RT @Austen: $40 Billion is enough to cure world hunger if you take it from billionaires, and completely inconsequential if you take it from…

@Urchilla01 "I dont speak until I've critically analysed an issue." Not on this one. Your analysis is not as critical as you think.

They don't have enough money to take care of Greenland but they want to buy California, whose GDP is at least 7x their? I have nothing against the Danes daring to dream

One would think given the proximity of Libya to Nigeria and the fact that Nigeria, your country, is suffering the ripple effects of the disastrous NATO invasion of Libya, you would take the time to learn the actual facts rather than just echo whatever US media house broadcasted. "You'd probably blame NATO if they allowed Gaddafi to continually kill protesters" Assuming (but not conceding) he killed protesters, how many protesters did he kill? Is the destruction of Libya worth it? Are the protesters lives more important than the millions (including in Nigeria) that have been killed, wounded or displaced since? Since when is it NATO's place to "allow" a sovereign country carry out internal affairs (good or bad)? Since when did protecting/avenging protesters become valid grounds for invading a country? The US jailed many of the J6 protesters on trumped-up charges and in solitary isolation without trial, violating several of their constitutional rights, should the US have been invaded? How about China after the Tiananmen Square massacre?

A battering ram can also be used to provoke, as was/is the case with Ukraine. The plan was to make "Ukraine Russia's Afghanistan" - exact phrase used. Giving the closeness of Ukraine to Russia, Russia was forced to act and that was the intention. If Mexico invites China to build a naval or military base somewhere in Mexico, the US will invade & everyone knows that. They also won't wait 8 years for China to entrench themselves like the Russians did.

Nah, I'll wait for confirmation. I've seen this playbook too many times with Ukraine.

@mrkezi_ They will say you're "disseminating Russian propaganda" or you're "pro-Putin" 😁

@alexander_aces @DavidHundeyin NATO boots on the ground in Libya and Yugoslavia say hi.

@hoelybutter @DavidHundeyin A sad fact is that people are still repeating the US-produced tropes & soundbites like a stuck cassette player in the aftermath of the USAID disclosures.

@DavidHundeyin Even Nigeria won't let Benin, Togo etc (or any other neighbouring countries it can push around) do anyhow. Wasn't it Nigeria that was trying to invade Niger? Abi doesn't Niger qualify as a "sovereign nation with clearly defined borders"?

"The people of Ukraine have the right to pursue their legitimate interests and aspirations." If this was true, why was there a Cuban Missile Crisis (of where there were actually 2)? Do the people of Mexico have the right to enter into a military alliance with China, if they deem it a "legitimate interest"? "Russia has bullied and invaded its neighbors" Not really. The one (bitter) lesson the Ruskies learnt from the Afghanistan disaster was a healthy phobia for foreign excursions. Their help is only offered with the explicit request and active participation of the host countries (see Syria, Kazakhstan, Belarus etc). As to your allegation of "invading", they only act to protect ethnic Russians who are being aggressed against. That was the case in Georgia (South Ossetia), Ukraine (Donbas) and will be the case in Moldova (Transnistria) if Moldova keeps up the provocation. I don't know you plucked Estonia from as Russia has not even as much as replied them when they try to offer their unsolicited opinions. You may have to provide facts to justify your Estonia mention. "Russia is not a democratic state. It is an oligarchy" Will it be true to say Nigeria is not a democracy (even though it has a multiplicity of issues)? While you can think Russia is an oligarchy, that does not make it one. You're a lawyer, you're supposed to stick to facts. "Read up and stop being a simpleton." Sound advice. You should take it too. "This war is ideological." That was the Cold War. This is purely economic. Again, listen to another US senator stating the quiet part out loud: "The vast majority of people in Ukraine want to be aligned to European and the Western values" This is not what the poll results conducted in Ukraine long before this war started show. Ukrainians were initially against EU & NATO, then they were for EU (not overwhelmingly) but never for NATO. "Before Putin’s crazy invasion" While it's an unfortunate series of events & outcomes, there's nothing crazy about it. Again, you have a lot of catching up to do - 17 years if you start from '08, or 11 if you start from '14. Hell, it's over 30 if you need to go back to the origin in '91. What you're doing is just echo-ing CNN talking points, which are not true but are propagated because they advance the US position on the matter. How come you didn't stop to think about the absurdity of the US, being the world's invader-in-chief, talking about the sovereignty of countries & their rights to pursue their interests?

Barrister, You have a lot of catching up to do on this matter, it seems. Not even proponents of "extending" (the actual term used) Russia make this claim you're making. The policy document guiding this is "Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground" published in 2019 by Rand Corp, where arming & using Ukraine as a battering ram was one of the options looked at. Many US public officials have made comments corroborating this. Here's Tim Scott saying the very thing you're saying is "not sensible".

Barrister, You have a lot of catching up to do on this matter, it seems. Not even proponents of "extending" (the actual term used) Russia make this claim you're making. The policy document guiding this is "Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground" published in 2019 by Rand Corp, where arming & using Ukraine as a battering ram was one of the options looked at. Many US public officials have made comments corroborating this. Here's Tim Scott saying the very thing you're saying is "not sensible". PS: I do admire your other efforts.

RT @aaronjmate: Hundreds of thousands of people would still be alive had Biden been willing to say this three years ago. Instead, Biden ref…

RT @MrReaganUSA: Did they really hire a blind guy as the Director of Government OVERSIGHT? Someone in DC has got a seriously twisted sense…