@rustcohle1994 同意

@xyw1116331 @ALIENXchain 0G不会rug，这点你可以放心

@web3el @CFXExplorer @WutalkWu 我觉得你应该定义一下什么叫重开新项目

@hashcoin0 @mac56473295 @0G_labs @mheinrich 总之你并不是中立的第三方，所以跟你的争论是无法客观进行的。但我想说0G在@mheinrich 的领导下，商业策略是非常包容和合作共赢的。megaeth跟0G未来也可能有很好的商业合作。所以如果你是megaeth的支持者，大可不必站在立场的角度来指责0G。欢迎你给予建设性的意见

@hashcoin0 @mac56473295 @0G_labs @mheinrich 你@的项目哪一个是你没有利益的你说一说？

@hashcoin0 @mac56473295 @0G_labs @mheinrich 争论很容易屁股决定脑袋。看了一下你的推特账号的描述。你的言论变得非常合情合理。想必你是在megaeth上有较多的利益。希望你在megaeth上能赚到钱。

我觉得你的脑回路非常的搞笑。你说0G技术上没创新，我说那你看下0G的白皮书和github。所以你看完是觉得有创新还是没创新呢？你看的那个repo长时间没有更新是因为那个repo已经在一个很稳定的状态了。0G现在主要的effort在compute网络和agent平台。 0G作为一个开源项目，有conflux的工程师贡献有什么问题么？Conflux是0G的angel investor，有一两个工程师做一些贡献有什么问题么？吴老师您要是会写代码，也欢迎您来贡献哈。 我不明白为什么一定要把conflux和0G对立来看，这两个项目分别有各自的roadmap和发展方向。生态上未来也可以建立起合作。Conflux的技术发展也丝毫没有停滞。树图的团队还在承担国家科技部的区块链项目。 另外，你用star来作为一种衡量标准我觉得在web3也非常欠妥。Eliza的repo star是不是很高。但我看推特上喷他代码烂的大有人在。总之你的评论在我看来，除了不够专业以外，就没有其它的了。当然，我能对你的专业水平有多高要求呢

@WutalkWu 随时都可以

RT @Jtsong2: 巧了，最近深度复盘了 @0G_labs 创始团队背景，尤其是仔细观看了创始人@mheinrich 的访谈，（精华版：）发现两个关键配置或许揭示了头部资本愿意入局的底层逻辑👇 🔹 灵魂人物：叙事纯度决定天…

@WutalkWu 我觉得吴老师你至少应该先看看0G的白皮书以及0G的github。不然这样的claim显得非常的不专业。另外，你如果是对现在的行业现状不满，那也请你多点评一些其它项目，你可以举出一些比0G做得好的项目，并且指出他们的优势所在，你也可以给0G提出相应的建议，相信0G会去学习改进。

@fanglongnian @henshuaimeqian @WutalkWu 虽然我并没有卖多少，但我想请问一下，觉得行为什么就不能卖？

Majority honesty is a commonly used security assumption in practice. This majority may not be on the number of nodes but on the amount of stakes so can defend the Sybil attack. Decentralized AI can potentially address the energy efficiency problem through some algorithm innovations that allow complex machine learning processes to be applied in resource constrained environments, e.g., lower network bandwidth.

可能0G太🔥了，连吴老师都要来蹭😄

@tokenbrother @kaisun55704098 @Ada_0g @mheinrich @WutalkWu 去中心化AI操作系统，为web3 AI应用提供去中心化管理的存储和计算资源。

@henshuaimeqian @WutalkWu 我行不行不重要，但cfx我觉得挺行的

RT @Ada_0g: 看到留言里这么多朋友猜 0G，我来给大家讲讲我们的创业故事吧。 @mheinrich 在很多场合都讲过 0G 的早期经历，可能 @WutalkWu 吴老师认识的某位朋友因英文水平有限，或因个人立场影响了判断，导致对 0G 创业背景的理解有所偏差。其实，…

RT @FanLong16: Impressed by our community’s drive! I strongly encourage you all to vote 🗳️ on the proposals for PoW rewards, Interest Rate,…

The current agent framework architectures must not be the ultimate form of what agents should look like. The agent framework will eventually evolve by itself driven by its own model reasoning rather than relying on human programing. If we make an analogy that the model is the brain of an agent, the agent framework, e.g., #Eliza, is then the body of it that connects its brain to the external world. The nature creates animals (assuming human is also a kind of animal) by giving them bodies and brains. What an animal can do heavily relies on its body form and how functional it can be. And the animal's intelligence level would also be limited by this. Creatures experienced billions-of-years evolution to generate the excellent form of human body to accommodate the super intelligent brain. However, the agent's body is the agent framework, which is a piece of code! And code is what the large language model can generate. This means an agent should be able to reform its body through its reasoning. So who should be responsible for defining how the agent framework looks like -- the agent itself, through its brain! I believe this would be the next generation of agent and its arrival won't be too far away.

Decentralization is the core spirit of the Web3 industry. Although the industry may have some focus sometime on the narratives about some new functional features that may deviate from the spirit a bit in short-term, it will circle back to the core sooner or later. Otherwise, the industry would eventually vanish.