If you believe unionization is solely about wages and benefits, organizing by Google workers might puzzle you. If you recognize unionization is about injecting democracy into autocratic workplaces, organizing by all workers makes perfect sense.
In hindsight, it is surprising this investigative reporting didn't happen soon after Antonin Scalia's death in 2016 at a wealthy businessman's giant ranch
Get ready for this: The best investigative reporters in the country are now going to be digging into the corruption of the Supreme Court, and the whole right apparatus behind the right wing judicial takeover, for many months to come.
"It seems to me to be equally plain that no business which depends for existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to continue in this country." - FDR
Minneapolis’s mayor on the supposedly dangerous precedent set by the ride share ordinance: “Are we now planning to set a minimum wage for every industry?”
In the 1950s, investor-owned utilities attacked electric co-ops as "socialistic" and launched a propaganda campaign against them in corporate mouthpieces like Reader's Digest. Good illustration of how the Red Scare's true target was the New Deal, not mythical Soviet infiltration.
Breaking up Facebook and Google is necessary but that alone is a conservative remedy that preserves their socially destructive methods of moneymaking. Abolishing their basic business model (targeted advertising built on mass surveillance) should be the end goal.
So much of contemporary Silicon Valley innovation is just "appwashing"--presenting predatory business models as socially beneficial because they are offered through an app
Do neoliberals like this Big Tech lobbyist realize that their fellow neoliberals are responsible for the United States not having adequate state capacity to deliver public services and works?
A new rule mandating finger-detection technology in table saws could raise costs by hundreds of dollars and result in a government-mandated monopoly.
I introduced a bipartisan bill to protect consumer choice and block this mandate until the patents for this tech are made public.
Imagine being horrified by the prospect of spending more money on things that make life better for people everywhere and less on things designed to kill people outside the U.S. . . .
Time to face the harsh reality, socialist Bernie Sanders will become the chairman of the Sen Budget Committee. He has vowed to use his position to enact his progressive agenda on healthcare, climate, infrastructure spending, & cutting defense spending.
@standamericanow
Mainstream economists are eternally afraid of a small risk of 5% annual inflation but are conspicuously silent about the 10,000% overnight increase in wholesale electricity prices in Texas last week
A revealing fact about the antitrust community: Many scholars and previously even the FTC were convinced that Uber had succeeded exclusively due to its app, instead of primarily through its large-scale lawbreaking and predatory pricing
U.S. Chamber of Commerce official: Because some workers have exceptional tolerance for high temperatures, the federal government should continue to let people unnecessarily suffer and die on the job from extreme heat
Instead of recognizing that Jeff Bezos' wealth is the result of legal entitlements that allow him to run Amazon and control many markets, mainstream economists believe he is millions of times more productive than the average person is
The Obama administration, in which Summers served, showed similar hostility to aiding distressed homeowners, while extending unlimited public support for big banks
To those who say $2,000 checks not optimal, but better than nothing: what is limiting principle? How about $10,000 checks? More?
Hard to justify support for near-universal giveaways when income losses fully replaced, w/ no liquidity problem for most.
During his time in the Obama administration, Larry Summers expressed this extremely right-wing view (and kept his job)
“One of the reasons that inequality has probably gone up in our society is that people are being treated closer to the way that they’re supposed to be treated.”
Fingers crossed we are on the verge of federal action against what appears to be one of the most harmful price-fixing schemes: third-party assisted collusion among landlords in cities across the country
SCOOP: DOJ’s
#antitrust
investigation into algorithmic price-fixing into rental housing market deepens with a dawn raid on a property management company
@JusticeATR
#cartel
I suspect most neoclassical economists exclude the creation and maintenance of property rights, enforcement of contracts, and chartering of corporations from their definition of "government intervention"
Law school trains and, even more importantly, socializes students to be aspiring judicial clerks and judges (instead of civil servants, administrators, legislators, public advocates, etc.). It's a big problem for lawyers in an (aspirationally) democratic society.
Critics of "cancel culture" are generally silent about at-will employment--and its adverse effects on free speech--because they support top-down control and seek to preserve hierarchical systems in the face of popular discontent
A common belief among progressives, including lawyers, is that bad Supreme Court decisions are divided ones--previously 5-4 and now 6-3. In reality, many bad rulings are 9-0, such as AMG Capital Management v. FTC this week.
Imagine if the federal government funded municipal broadband utilities to compete against Comcast. That is what the Public Works Administration did in the 1930s for cities that were frustrated with the high rates and poor service of power companies.
This action alone, which marginalized the Free File program and left millions of Americans at the mercy of Intuit every tax season, should disqualify Renata Hesse from government positions
At all levels, the Democratic Party appears to favor people who exude careerist ambition and treat every elected or appointed position as merely a stepping stone to something bigger, instead of a public responsibility that should be taken seriously and done well
What should tarnish academia's reputation but doesn't: Not mythical "nutty left-wing professors of underwater basket weaving" but the many glorified corporate lobbyists umm "libertarian scholars" who teach in economics departments and law schools
Legal scholars: The law grants Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk entitlements to run and derive great wealth from Amazon, Facebook, and Tesla
Mainstream economists: These individuals are actually millions of times more productive than the rest of us
Hochul sides with bad employers and loses any claim to be "pro-worker." This ban would have pressured firms to retain workers by offering good pay and fair treatment, instead of using non-competes clauses.
TLDR: Let's ignore Amazon's unfair competitive practices, alleged in great detail by the FTC, and instead assume the FTC is suing the company for offering lower prices and better service
Being an Econ 101 bro means never having to take facts seriously
The FTC's complaint against Amazon makes an Econ 101 mistake: confusing a shift of a curve for a movement along a curve.
Fellow Econ 101 teachers, our time has come! A 🧵
Finally read this complaint carefully. Damning stuff--RealPage helps landlords jointly raise rents in Phoenix, Tucson, and cities across the country and contributes to the housing crisis. This should be a national scandal.
Yes, it's outrageous! From our
@arizonaago
complaint, here are two maps showing multifamily apartments where RealPage is allegedly collecting and sharing pricing and occupancy information in the Phoenix and Tucson areas. Camaron - thank you for sharing this.
In oral argument in NCAA v. Alston, Clarence Thomas just asked the NCAA's lawyer (Clinton era solicitor general Seth Waxman) why the "amateurism" principle (benign name for collusive wage suppression) applies to players, but not to coaches. A very good question.
The First Circuit's decision last week that workers, regardless of employment classification, can organize and strike for better terms and conditions of work (without violating the Sherman Act) may be the most important and best antitrust development in 2022 so far
My read of the initial reactions to FTC non-compete ban:
Everyone seems to love it, except for Big Law attorneys, corporate lobbyists, and their favorite antitrust professors
When neoclassical economists claim they are "non-ideological," recall what they consider government "intervention" (and hence suspect):
Intervention: Consumer protection, labor, and minimum wage laws
Not intervention: Property rights, contract enforcement, and corporate charters
This is a great idea. The drivers and cars didn't go anywhere, they are still in Minneapolis. If the people who do the work get financing, they could establish a democratic alternative to the VC-run Uber and Lyft.
Elite law school faculties are principally made up of the ideological equivalents of Amy Klobuchar and John Kasich and yet are somehow "leftist" in the eyes of right wingers.
An idea for improving Shark Tank:
Instead of Mark Cuban and some other rich people deciding whether to invest in mostly trivial business ideas, have a modern Harold Ickes award federal grants to fund projects proposed by state and local governments
The end goal of neoliberal attacks on unions, occupational licensing, and other forms of non-corporate market governance is to Uberize all work arrangements
New Columbia Law Review statement—the student board has voted to refuse to work until:
(1) Rabea Eghbariah’s Article is published online without qualification or disclaimer, and
(2) CLR’s Board of Directors commits to complete editorial independence of the journal
Delighted to share that I am writing a book for
@uchicagopress
on the successes and shortcomings of cooperative and public power in the United States (working title Democracy in Power) and how they can inform the
#GreenNewDeal
today. I am excited to work with
@chadzimmerman_
!
Obama since leaving office:
1. Helping install Tom Perez as DNC chair
2. Endorsing Macron for French presidency (in first round)*
3. Reassuring Theresa May that she would keep her majority against Corbyn's insurgency
4. Orchestrating centrist consolidation against Bernie Sanders
Former president Barack Obama says he supports Sen. Joe Manchin III’s effort to scale back a sweeping voting rights bill in hopes of securing some Republican support
Someone who is "a public servant at heart" probably wouldn't choose to be Uber's chief legal officer and lead its fight against labor and employment rights for drivers
The post-1970s antitrust revolution is an underappreciated culprit in the Great Regression.
For instance, the growth of poorly paid, precarious jobs (fast food, Uber, Amazon, etc.) was brought to us by Supreme Court decisions like Sylvania.
Mostly forgotten radicalism of the New Deal:
In addition to the Rural Electrification Administration extending credit to electric cooperatives, the Public Works Administration gave loans and grants to municipalities to take over investor-owned utilities.
A neoclassical economist when observing a few get very rich thanks to particular configurations of property, contract, corporation, consumer protection, and antitrust rules: Markets are natural and efficient and must not be modified through state action!
Great excerpt in U.S. v. Google on how Google shares its monopoly profits with Apple. Google pays billions for exclusive pre-installation on Apple devices--payments that are as much as one-fifth of Apple's annual net income.
The Secretary of Transportation has consumer protection and antitrust powers to stop and remedy the airlines' misconduct and negligence. Buttigieg appears uninterested in using them.
As travelers look to rebook due to Southwest's cancellations, other airlines should cap fares on these routes to help people who need to get home. I'm encouraged to see several airlines have now committed to this step – all of them should.
Amazing! The FTC proposes a complete ban on non-compete clauses--no carveouts tied to income or occupation. This blanket prohibition would protect *all* workers.
"The Uber files reveal for the first time that [the late Alan Krueger] was paid about $100,000 for a study that was widely quoted in support of Uber as a creator of good jobs precisely because it operated outside the rules."
A former colleague from the Obama Administration just shot me a text: “remember when we abided by the Hatch Act?” We were all so quaint and naive back then, following the law and such.
The current Antitrust Division has correctly recognized that Uber's misclassification of workers is unfair competition--not the type of competition the law should condone
In
@WIRED
, I argue the Biden administration should do more than just litigate the antitrust suits against Facebook and Google. To tame corporate dominance, the FTC should enact bright-line rules to restrict mergers and outlaw unfair competitive practices
Traditional cab companies offered apps too (remember Hailo?) but they generally complied with labor and employment laws and municipal cab regulations and didn't have the luxury of losing billions of dollars year after year
Me, dumb and unsophisticated: We should discount the opinions of economists who are paid by big businesses to say monopoly is okay and who have been consistently wrong in their predictions.
You, smart and savvy: AD HOMINEM!
The First Amendment prohibits government censorship and protects private censorship. In a free society, Twitter and Facebook are allowed to make horrible decisions with respect to content moderation, and you are allowed to tell them off and use another service.
FTC staff spent years reviewing the evidence on non-competes, thinking about the agency's statutory authority, and identifying more targeted methods of protecting business information. They did not just wake up one morning and say, "Hey, let's ban non-competes for everyone!"
So-called pro-worker conservatives refuse to offer one important thing: power on the job
Student debt cancellation would give millions more power to walk away from bad jobs and to work in public service, subsidized apprenticeships would not do that
Neoclassical economists pushed these bad ideas. Given their poor track record and methodology (not to mention the corruption of many practitioners), maybe we should stop listening to them?
The bottom line is:
Many things that were believed in the 1990s turned out to be wrong: from transition economics, to deregulation of the financial sector, to privatization of pensions, to "trade leading to peace".
Hard to think of a decade that was so wrong.
Good piece by
@zachdcarter
on the economist Joan Robinson. Two critical points in it:
- Employer power is the norm
- Breaking up large firms and other antitrust measures, while valuable, are no substitute for unions (and, I'd add, a federal job guarantee)
Antitrust is a funny field: lawyers and scholars who lobby for large corporations (often making lots of money pushing things like mergers and acquisitions) love posturing as "neutral experts," while they disparage those on the other side as "activists."
Adding a few more elite lawyers to the Supreme Court is vastly inferior to stripping the federal judiciary of jurisdiction over a wide range of matters
Enthusiastic libertarian defenses of Pfizer's COVID vaccine profits are a good reminder that these supposed "enemies of the state" love government action (such as patent protection for publicly supported research) that concentrates power and wealth among a privileged few
D.C. is set to outlaw employee noncompete contracts, after Mayor Bowser signed D.C. Council's proposal (pending 30-day congressional review). It's a step beyond states' recent efforts at stopping employers from imposing noncompetes on low-wage workers
Guest worker programs bind immigrants to employers and are supported by big business interests that want captive workforces. All immigrants should have full labor and employment rights on day one in the United States.
One of many lessons from Texas electricity fiasco:
Don't force people to comparison shop for essential services. It is burdensome, makes life even more complicated, and creates another playground for deceptive, high-pressure marketers.
What unifies the "tech" sector is violating public policy as a competitive method
Amazon: Avoided collecting sales taxes
Facebook and Google: Built surveillance dragnets that disregard norms against spying
Uber: Flouted labor and employment laws and municipal cab regs
Centrists during Obama admin: Without Congress on board, the president can't do any of the good things lefties want. Learn about the American system of government!
Centrists during Biden admin: Okay maybe he can, but those good things are actually bad.
Epic v. Google is a reminder of why big businesses and their allies have been fighting for decades to weaken antitrust law's powerful private right of action and to limit jury trials. Both provide essential checks on corporate prerogatives.
I would add that being a Big Law attorney (in many fields) is quite easy today because the law is stacked in favor of powerful corporations. In contrast, being a successful plaintiffs' attorney or state enforcer requires real creativity and talent.
Conservative "antimonopolists": Big Tech's decision to suspend certain accounts and apps is an outrage and must be addressed. Challenging corporate prerogatives outside this context, however, is communism.
Imagine believing the distribution of income is the product of metaphysical concepts such as "technology" or the "marginal productivity of labor" and not the product of who has power.
"A considerable body of research concludes that most mergers do not create value for anyone, except perhaps the investment bankers that negotiated the deal." - Professor Melissa Schilling
AT&T's $200 billion merger spree promised a universe of innovation, but instead we saw:
47,000 layoffs
higher prices for consumers and competitors
7 million lost customers in just three years
a huge loss on a sale of acquired assets
good job all around
The neoliberalism of the Carter administration is still very underappreciated. I just read articles by Alfred Kahn (head of the Civil Aeronautics Board under Carter) in which he warned about "grossly monopolistic wages" and wished for the death of the "public utility concept."
"The government should not pick winners and losers" is easily one of the silliest lines in econ discourse. A government (left, center, or right) does exactly that and nothing else.
In this very good article, Brett Christophers explains how the Obama administration not only failed to assist distressed homeowners but also facilitated the transfer of their properties to private equity firms like Blackstone