rachael_katz Profile Banner
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊ Profile
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊

@rachael_katz

Followers
846
Following
238K
Statuses
14K

Artist, maker, revolutionary. Humanity's future can go 2 ways. We can work together towards the common good & build something beautiful or we can die. (She/Her)

Massachusetts
Joined September 2012
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
4 years
I want out of this simulation. This timeline blows and it's almost over anyway.
6
54
80
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
1 day
@s3igu2 That's damn impressive for a printed FCG component. Well done!
0
0
1
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
3 days
@HadleyGenevieve @AndyLeeParker1 Restaurants? I know the owners of some of my local small places will shop at Costco sometime, perhaps when the suppliers jack up the price or have a shortage.
0
0
1
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
3 days
@Cobratate @ivan_8848 😂😂😂
0
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
3 days
RT @SocialistMMA: How the fuck are you an “independent journalist” if you rely on funding from the U.S. government? Corporate journalism…
0
880
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
4 days
RT @medeabenjamin: Now that Trump is openly advocating for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, Democrats are suddenly calling his ideas “insane.”…
0
3K
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
4 days
@acnewsitics You have no empathy, we're well aware, no need to keep reminding us. Your candidate and political party have none as well, which is a big part of why they lost.
0
0
1
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 Even if one were to stipulate that everything you said is correct (its not), it doesn't negate the fact that one of the two major parties dissolved and a new one arose. The same could happen again w/Dems & another party, if all you VBNMW morons would simply vote for someone else.
2
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 Except you're looking at popular vote, not EC. For someone who talks so much about the electoral college, one would think you'd know how it works. Bush would have won without Perot and at the time (I was there), everyone understood that.
1
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 You're the one who keeps mixing up the electoral college with political parties. Perhaps after you get some rest it will be clearer to you.
Tweet media one
1
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 You just keep being wrong as long as you like. A wiser person would learn from their mistakes.
Tweet media one
0
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 You can beg all you want, you're still wrong. Whigs merged with Know Nothings to form the Constitutional Union party and 1960 was only the second presidential election the newly formed Republicans ever ran in. That's a third party no matter how hard you deny.
2
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 Irrelevant distraction. The founders not only did not design a two party system, they are on record saying that the rise of any political parties would mark the end of the republic.
1
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 Lincoln was a third party candidate and Clinton never would have been president without Perot. What you are saying is provably, and in fact proven, false. You are repeating propaganda, nothing more.
2
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 No, what's stupid is pretending it is a two party system when there is literally nothing in the constitution, in law, in historical events, nor inherent in the structure to make it so. In fact the people who designed the system didn't want ANY political parties.
2
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@IanCarrollShow @e_galv You contradict yourself. You say the path doesn't come from an institution, but that religion is essential. Religion IS the institution. Faith and belief can be outside the institution, but not religion. Religion is precisely the institutionalization of faith and belief.
0
0
2
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 Yeah, you're beating your head against a wall alright, voting Dem year after year without fail and wondering why you never have a voting option who responds to what you actually want. They know they have your vote so they don't care what you want. You don't matter to them.
1
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@caitoz
Caitlin Johnstone
5 days
Funny how US presidents fulfill different agendas depending on their base. Trump couldn't have done what Biden did because then the "Trump is literally Hitler" liberals would have opposed the genocide. Biden couldn't do what Trump is doing because he couldn't be an overt tyrant.
1
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 Because life is more than one election long and past actions have consequences. The left didn't make Dems abandon the working class and cozy up to billionaires. The left didn't trumpet their endorsement by Cheneys. And the left didn't make Dems commit genocide. Your lot did.
0
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 No, those of us who didn't vote for Harris aren't the ones who turned the Democrats into a party that people won't vote for. You short-sighted VBNMW "centrists" are the ones who made Democrats unpalatable to 70% of registered voters. That's on you, not us.
0
0
0
@rachael_katz
Rachael Seven - ✌️❤️✊
5 days
@LynnF77024692 That is a non-falsifiable counterfactual statement that means absolutely nothing. All available evidence, including Harris' own statements that she would make no change to Biden's Israel policy, suggested she would be doing the exact same thing as Trump, perhaps w/less bragging.
1
0
1