@BunkiePerkins Welcome to Cleveland a Aron

@jamierkennedy @McIlroyRory They’re true but at same time that doesn’t mean the fan experience is any better. It’s crazy they throw more money at players while making the actual product worse if anything

@Marcus_Mosher You love tee Higgins. He’s a great #2 who is often hurt. I don’t see how paying him like a #1 works out

@Fit_For_Golf Hell ya Paul, crushing it!!!

@radfugee As if that would ever be possible. Europe needs the US far more than vice versa

@bennpeifert Well that would imply a religious figure should somehow apply to governmental decisions. Catholic Church is probably one of only orgs in world as screwed up as current admin

@cryptoklotz Pure? It’s always been a grift. By definition something that accomplishes nothing and has no value is going to be negative expected value to buy. Memes are overall trash and the crypto space as a whole would be better to move on from them

@alistairmilne @gainzy222 @RookieXBT Not what that means at all but ok

@nope_its_lily Fraud szn

@radfugee Destroying it by reducing their funding ? Couldn’t they just scale back their research if truly none of this overage funding is unnecessary? That sound a bit histrionic to me. Whole system seems weird to me. Or just increase the grant amounts and allow 0 overage. It’s inefficient

@radfugee Stop building a new one every year. Every level 1 academic center I’ve seen is constantly building something new. I’m not sure how reducing overhead is a bad thing and the concept of giving x grant dollars and then having an overage as high as 70% beyond that seems wild

@CMichaelGibson They have that margin by choice. Every single major academic institution is building something new and shiny at basically any given point in time. Don’t build a fancy new shiny glass building, focus more on patient care and research

@bennpeifert And therefore is useful how? Overhyped supercharged google searches

@kchoudhu It’s interesting I haven’t heard the usual suspects that are in favor of this give props for that

@bennpeifert @victorxstewart Which is why it’s hilarious when zerohedge is like “ betting markets now pricing in xyz” when it’s like 100 dollars of bets

@bennpeifert Doesn’t that just mean it’s illiquid ?

@PCYintheCLE @MaryKayCabot Should have traded him this past year. Lost substantial amount of value now. In all reality he’s gonna decline over next 2-3 years with near certainty. Gotta unload these guys at their peaks, as much as it pains you to do Agree they are not a reasonable qb away from contending

@deltaxbt Well it’s bc previous price action last few cycles enabled them to be price agnostic and just focus on the tech. Now they have legit competitors and don’t seem to understand that in crypto line go up is all that really matters

@iamDCinvestor @0x69420_ It’s easy to have a big green candle when you just got 3x that much of a red one…