![nobu ' Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1863423304411103232/Z7d3brVy_x96.jpg)
nobu '
@nobuhojimichaan
Followers
4K
Following
173K
Statuses
84K
talk to me about spiritual and physical health '
australia '
Joined April 2009
i'm interested in the "professionalization" of "energetic healing" ' it has been conspicuous to me for a while that there r all of these "workshops" and "name brand lineages" of new age varieties on the one hand — and on the other hand ancient healing traditions where lineage is formed from a trail of teachers who taught students who became teachers and who now teach and practice out of those lineages ' it's also been conspicuous to me that many of these /lineages/ end up being studied by people who have studied psychology or medicine or psychiatry and been licensed to practice in those fields — and then end up being /absorbed/ by those fields — and to me ? especially when it comes to shamanic lineages ? in the process they r distorted with regard to — 1/ the self healing requirements of practitioners who r ordained to give the gift of the work / medicine ' 2/ how energy or money is exchanged for the work ' 3/ the barrier of entry for traditional lineage holders (e.g. learning psychology or medicine) is often financially far too high and or time-consuming and or /doesn't actually improve that person's ability to do the work/ ' i'm interested in what professionalization of /energy healing/ looks like — and i've been talking to a lot of people about it for a long time — and i know it's important bc i've been thwarted many times by what i will call /interference/ from /thought forms/ aka "demons" ' i would like to hear from others on this — both fellow practitioners of "energetic healing" and those who r interested and or skeptical about the field ' topics i would like to hold space for include — 1/ what a code of ethics / principles of practice look like ' 2/ what is the common theoretical / possibly-empirically-verifiable basis of this work ? ' how do we know it's working ? ' how do we know if it's not working ? ' 3/ what does accountability aka "trust & safety" look like ? (if u've been following @thebroomradio's work on #safety or #thestick then u may have some idea how /i/ feel about it ' 4/ what does a path to legitimization or even insurance-coverage look like ? ' if u r interested in discussing these topics with me, plz dm me (@nobuhojimichaan) or @intrepidbodies or @AnnaFalby or @thebroomradio ' or ? reply in the comments with questions or remarks ' we would love to hear from u ' #shoptok '
11
8
56
@lumpfished mm did u read the study ? ' this seems quite similar to the training that was given to the people who were participating '
0
0
1
@sidewayskoyote @sonikudzu where was that ? ' i've been to the aftermath of usaid helping people in haiti to have stable health information systems and access to internet in remote areas '
0
0
1
anyway, the people who were studied for those studies may b v different to the people who responded to ur poll ! ' as such, it seems to me, ironically, overly confident of u to assume that the results of ur poll support the statement u made that people r overconfident in their lack of overconfidence ! 💀 '
0
0
0
@cliobscure wow i think only my 95 year old grandma who barely speaks english isn't aware of ai hype '
0
0
2
my (hakka) parents came to australia bc of systemic discrimination in malaysia ' (yes, hakka r chinese but also, kinda not by definition) ' my father happens to b v scholarly ' my mother is a v undisciplined scholar ' both of them were like 95% percentile athletic / attractive within their communities ' so yes, i have had many awkward interactions with people who prefer to keep people like me in boxes '
Many Chinese who went to study in the West are of the scholarly (文) type. So Westerners think all Chinese are nerdy. That is, until these Westerners get beaten by the more martial (武) Chinese in sports & military competitions. In Chinese, someone can be 文, 武 or both.
0
0
0
i disagree that a common binding needs to b used to share experiences but it is the normative way of sharing experiences ' for me, words r the seeds of demons and thought forms ' my lineages don't differentiate between them ' there r ways of using words and not using words to gesture at experiences so that a receiver may find the experiences of their own that align with my experiences ' words r more commonly vectors of transmission so that receivers may suppress their own experience in order to take on aspects of my experiences ' when extrapolated, this creates a uniformity of experience which leads to stagnation ' of course, dao will correct itself '
1
0
1