Markus Meister Profile
Markus Meister

@mameister4

Followers
5K
Following
180
Statuses
352

Neuroscientist at Caltech

Joined November 2017
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@mameister4
Markus Meister
1 month
@dimiterbak @jieyusz Yes that looks compatible. It's a difficult task, and people got only 5 min to practice, so probably didn't reach their capacity limit.
0
0
2
@mameister4
Markus Meister
2 months
@Timothy0Leary I had previously advertised this paper in preprint form, so peer review was the major addition since then. But I see how the post can be misunderstood...
0
0
0
@mameister4
Markus Meister
2 months
RT @_TheTransmitter: "[It’s] the largest unexplained number in brain science. I feel like neuroscience should pay more attention to it ..."…
0
11
0
@mameister4
Markus Meister
2 months
Jieyu Zheng @jieyusz, my splendid co-author, is looking at post-doc opportunities...
3
0
11
@mameister4
Markus Meister
2 months
0
0
0
@mameister4
Markus Meister
2 months
Horace Barlow, by all accounts, was thinking about 30 years ahead of his time. Here is a transcript of the opening keynote I gave at a symposium honoring Horace's scientific legacy:
Tweet media one
2
13
61
@mameister4
Markus Meister
3 months
And not because this system is particularly simple: It consists of at least 100 cell types and uses just about every neurotransmitter known to man. Interesting questions: What made this progress possible and how can we extend the lessons to other parts of the brain?
2
0
24
@mameister4
Markus Meister
3 months
@jpillowtime @SussilloDavid @SebastianSeung Marr's goal was "understanding a complex information processing system". Do you feel that DNNs deliver such "understanding"?
3
0
9
@mameister4
Markus Meister
4 months
@cshperspectives ...as in "However, it is important to recognize that peer-review by a journal is a first step towards validation, rather than being the final word on it."
0
0
1
@mameister4
Markus Meister
4 months
@cshperspectives Google scholar can't list the references of an article. So no backwards search. Pubmed lists them but as dead text with no further operations on that list. Also Pubmed scope too limited for interdisciplinary work.
0
0
2
@mameister4
Markus Meister
4 months
@cshperspectives IMO Google Scholar and Pubmed are too primitive for serious literature review.
1
0
2
@mameister4
Markus Meister
4 months
@cshperspectives I use WoS for literature research. It's the best tool I know for forward and backward searches in a new area. Nothing to do with impact factors. If eLife papers aren't visible in WoS, I can't honestly recommend that students publish there.
1
0
2
@mameister4
Markus Meister
4 months
@mbeisen Happens to me less and less. For old papers there's sci-hub (or so I'm told). For new papers preprints. If authors don't preprint, they probably don't want you reading the work.
0
0
2
@mameister4
Markus Meister
4 months
@S_Andreoni @mamboitaliano__ Agree. Probably British. Steering wheel on the right.
1
0
0
@mameister4
Markus Meister
5 months
@EikoFried Thought this post was about mini hamburgers. Oh well...
0
0
1