![mikko silliman Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1001927640218062848/UC1kiRML_x96.jpg)
mikko silliman
@m_silliman
Followers
1K
Following
7K
Statuses
1K
primarily interested in research on education, labor & inequality. AP @AaltoBIZ @helsinkiGSE, phd @harvard
Joined April 2017
RT @ProfDavidDorn: Join my outstanding research team in Zurich as a #predoc research associate in summer/fall 2025! We conduct empirical a…
0
40
0
Aligns very much with what we see:
Super interesting new economics paper suggests that the rising college gap between men and women won’t necessarily lead to less marriage among college-educated women. Why? Short answer: Because college-educated women are okay marrying economically stable men without a college degree -
0
0
5
RT @andres_bafer: 🚨📢 3rd Workshop on Economics of Education, Valle Nevado, 🇨🇱 (Aug 19-22) Confirmed speakers 🎓 JOHN FRIEDMAN (Brown) 🎓 S…
0
16
0
RT @anup_malani: The value of compute & (training) data stocks depends on the demand elasticity for compute & data. We don't know that ela…
0
4
0
RT @Jabaluck: An alternative is that either existing facts and measurements are sufficient to do things like develop better biological and…
0
1
0
@jonasvlachos USA: education data: ACS -- labor markets/demographics: various area indicators:
0
0
1
RT @jonasvlachos: Dear social scientists! Please direct me to data sources (not the least microdata) that are available to students at the…
0
4
0
RT @chiancheng: @andrew14ryan @DorsanderJ @LevyAntoine Without legal status, a newborn is literally an illegal alien under immigration law…
0
1
0
interesting that there is no decrease in relationship formation -- at least a working theory in mind has been that dating apps have contributed to part of the decline in relationship formation/fertility over the past decades
Tinder’s introduction + sharply & persistently increased sexual activity with no impact on relationship formation + increased inequality in dating outcomes among male but not female students + increased sexual assaults & STDs + improved female students' mental health
0
0
1
RT @JPAM_DC: Early view Policy Insights article from JPAM: "Not a border crisis, but a labor market crisis: The often overlooked “pull” fac…
0
6
0
RT @hausfath: Great (and scary) visualization of 2024 daily temperatures compared to prior years by the BBC today. Evocative of the iconic…
0
1K
0
RT @lugaricano: A global relationship recession: across the world, the drop in fertility is not due to less children per couple, but to a s…
0
660
0
RT @MatthewAKraft: The 2025 Economic Report of the President is now out! 🇺🇸 Each chapter has much to offer, but I'll highlight Chpt 7: Th…
0
24
0
...not quite there, but slowly observing this reality
Something I've observed in academia but I suspect is true in industry as well: as you become more senior, you'll find that you can be much more productive if you spend all your time being a manager and letting junior people do all the real work. But after a few years of this, you're likely to lose your skill at doing the work yourself, the opportunity to practice that skill, and the gratification of doing so that drew you to your chosen profession in the first place. And you'll probably also get worse at being a manager as you lose touch with the actual work. Avoiding managerdom is hard. You have to give up substantial short-term productivity gains. If you're in academia in a tenure track, you risk not getting tenure by being less productive. And personally I find that switching between thinker mode (deep work with no distractions for a whole day) and manager mode (a thousand quick but urgent tasks) to be highly unpleasant. When I'm in thinker mode, it kills me that people have to wait a day (often a lot more) for a 1-minute response from me that could unblock them on what they're stuck on and save them hours of work. When I'm in manager mode, it kills me that I have all these creative ideas sloshing around in my brain that I'm not able to execute on. So it's extremely tempting to perpetually be in just one mode or the other. When you have a team, not managing them is not an option, but being a pure manager is an option. That makes a constant struggle to carve out time for your own work and not give in to the temptation. Note: I think this is only tangentially related to Founder Mode vs Manager Mode. It's much more related to another Paul Graham essay, Maker's Schedule vs Manager's Schedule. And Deep Work by Cal Newport is very relevant.
0
0
1
RT @Woessmann: 📢Call for papers: 🚀3rd CESifo/ifo Junior Workshop on the Economics of Education🥳 12-13 May 2025, Munich Keynote: @ALPWill…
0
97
0
RT @MortenStostad: After a BSc in Astronomy I did a two-year Economics MSc at LSE in 2016-18. The MSc is designed to get non-economists up…
0
344
0
RT @florianederer: Give people housing and they'll have kids! Obtaining housing increases the average probability of having a child by 3.8…
0
674
0
RT @nberpubs: Exploring past episodes of technological disruption in the US labor market, with the goal of learning lessons about the likel…
0
47
0