Lucy Letby did not have a fair trial and must be granted an appeal

@drphilhammond Wow…..

Pretty much sums it up.

@KingOfHits Yes, and more importantly to alert CCRC. It’s very worrying indeed.

@helen_spirit1 The person themselves decides not the bill. The panel of experts then make the final decision. It gives people with terminal illness more agency and to a dignified death. What are you so opposed to about that.

@alkcheet @jeffbarrow81 @triedbystats @LucyLetbyTrials Good point. It’s definitely within the realm of possibility.

@gill1109 😂😂

@triedbystats @LucyLetbyTrials Panel of 14 experts: “No evidence of air embolism” Liz Hull - “No evidence of air embolism is conclusive evidence of air embolism.”

@LucyLetbyTrials Lady Chief Justice Hull

@DrSusanOliver1 @Oxfordite In fact, no one in the scientific or medical community has come forward since the trial with a full case review of the all evidence to say its point to murder. No one.

@DrSusanOliver1 @Oxfordite Don’t you think it strange that none of the experts at the trial have publicly stood by Dr Evan’s theories since the trial? They gave alternative explanations e.g Dr Marnerides said of baby C that the X-ray was “not absolute proof” of AE & prof Owens said air is seen in sepsis.

@UVuuMe That would be correct if the original trial was fair and they had heard the findings of the panel of 14 experts

@Oxfordite @DrSusanOliver1 Lucy will be exonerated from prison & the world will know the truth & Rupert will still be shouting “but did you not read Dr Susan’s submission?!.” He did not have a COI, he convened a panel on the condition he would publish it even if it was not favourable to Lucy. He was clear.

@Oxfordite @berrysurviving @oldjamfan @gill1109 I’ve been asking you to stop talking to me for a long time. You’re trolling me.

@Dorrit2014 @Oxfordite @DrSusanOliver1 Yes, must be dark up there !

@Oxfordite @berrysurviving @oldjamfan @gill1109 Stop giving me reasons to believe those things about you then. And moreover, stop talking to me ! You don’t grasp the basics about the grounds for appeal and what they need to show. You’re irrelevant.

@medic_southside @Oxfordite @berrysurviving @oldjamfan @gill1109 It all goes over Rupert’s head, he hasn’t grasped the basic facts of the case at all. He has encouraged me to think he is irrelevant.

@Oxfordite @DrSusanOliver1 Sorry, “Bye Rupert” is not an invitation to carry on talking.

@merchant47 @Oxfordite @DrSusanOliver1 He can’t. He knows nothing about the case, far less understands it.

@Oxfordite @berrysurviving @oldjamfan @gill1109 Oh you don’t know what a straw man fallacy is - look it up. You’re getting blocked now

@Oxfordite @DrSusanOliver1 Yes they are guilty of attributing malice to that which can be explained by incompetence, the simpler explanation. That is Occam’s razor. In your book, anyone who doubts the convictions is stupid, so I don’t really trust your book. Bye Rupert