![KB Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1846027202955022336/ZSi5lZbi_x96.jpg)
KB
@iBronBron
Followers
367
Following
7K
Statuses
7K
Joined November 2011
@blakeofspades11 @ProFootballTalk It’s not fast to begin with. Handful of seconds a play and then a lot of standing around. We already get a tv timeout while they debate anyway.
0
0
4
@adampelletier @HOFSteveTasker Fine. But it’s still a chance when you pick one guy over the others, e.g., Allen. Yet, a five-man secondary needs more depth (better), and a defensive head coach should be on top of that—it is his system.
0
0
0
@adampelletier @HOFSteveTasker Let’s talk on this for once. Money problems, et al. departure, “rebuild”, and made it to the second last game? Or pattern? Same opponent with repeatedly “close” losses when it’s do or die.
1
0
1
@dorianpolk_ Didn’t have consistent execution on offense. Fingers can be pointed everywhere, but if you execute, a lot of the “closeness” is irrelevant.
1
0
3
Wait … where are the term limits for Congress? Across the board or leave it alone.
In the face of increasing threats to America’s democratic institutions, I am calling for three bold reforms to restore trust and accountability to the Supreme Court and our democracy. First, I am calling for a constitutional amendment called the No One Is Above the Law Amendment. It would make clear that there is no immunity for crimes a former president committed while in office. I share our Founders’ belief that the president’s power is limited, not absolute. We are a nation of laws—not of kings or dictators. Second, we have had term limits for presidents for nearly 75 years. We should have the same for Supreme Court justices. The United States is the only major constitutional democracy that gives lifetime seats to its high court. Term limits would help ensure that the court’s membership changes with some regularity. That would make timing for court nominations more predictable and less arbitrary. It would reduce the chance that any single presidency radically alters the makeup of the court for generations to come. I support a system in which the president would appoint a justice every two years to spend 18 years in active service on the Supreme Court. Third, I’m calling for a binding code of conduct for the Supreme Court. This is common sense. The court’s current voluntary ethics code is weak and self-enforced. Justices should be required to disclose gifts, refrain from public political activity and recuse themselves from cases in which they or their spouses have financial or other conflicts of interest. Every other federal judge is bound by an enforceable code of conduct, and there is no reason for the Supreme Court to be exempt. All three of these reforms are supported by a majority of Americans—as well as conservative and liberal constitutional scholars. In America, no one is above the law. In America, the people rule.
0
0
1