Sven E. Hug Profile
Sven E. Hug

@hug_sven

Followers
1K
Following
14K
Statuses
2K

research evaluation | bibliometrics | peer review | science policy

Switzerland
Joined June 2017
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
3 years
Peer review is undertheorized. In this paper, I therefore encourage peer review researchers to be more theoretically engaged. I also discuss - Main characteristics of the peer review literature - Why theory is useful - Theoretical efforts on peer review
6
29
103
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
3 months
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: New book surveying science of science from perspective of different disciplines
0
16
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
3 months
@MishaTeplitskiy Open access! 🤩
0
0
2
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
4 months
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: Small trial of funding via lottery finds null effects of winning on pubs, citations
0
9
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
4 months
RT @primediscussion: Nothing. He was lying.
0
9K
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
4 months
RT @robysinatra: Based on data (not opinions), the works of Hopfield and Hinton #NobelPrize2024 1. Are physics 2.…
0
37
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
4 months
RT @robysinatra: Glad that #NobelPrize Physics caught up with recognizing interdisciplinary discoveries! We investigated the interdisciplin…
0
4
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
5 months
RT @c_est_lucy: So many things going on lately that I hadn't had the time to share this preprint, which I'm particularly proud of 🥳 Evaluat…
0
7
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
5 months
RT @ablatchjones: Early insight to a recent scoping review on the benefits and challenges of AI for research funding organisations https:…
0
1
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
5 months
RT @squazzoni: Here is a new #preprint on #openscience #opendata with @tonyR_H @klebel_t @federico_fb showing that more competitive #resear…
0
6
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
5 months
RT @tonyR_H: 💡 Preprint alert! 💡 Over the summer we preprinted our scoping review of the academic impact of open science. This is joint w…
0
24
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
5 months
@PolonenJanne Nice slides, Janne! Thanks for sharing them.
1
0
1
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
5 months
RT @FWFOpenAccess: Just published by @RoRInstitute: Gregory, Kathleen; Waltman, Ludo; Pinfield, Stephen (2024). Peer review in funding orga…
0
7
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
5 months
RT @JeroenBaas: @KevinBoyack @aarontay Something that strikes me in the response is “The concerns seem to be founded on fear (…) that the r…
0
1
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
5 months
RT @KevinBoyack: @JeroenBaas @aarontay Yes, unfortunate. And a misrepresentation as well. I don't think bibliometricians feel threatened. R…
0
3
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
5 months
@acabezas Coarism - love it!
0
0
3
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
5 months
RT @KevinBoyack: I'll side with Giovanni here, not only because his arguments are well reasoned (they are!), but also because if he hadn't…
0
5
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
6 months
@ekulczycki That's awesome! Didn't know that. Was only aware of the general Poland context.
0
0
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
6 months
RT @Swiss_SSC: 🔧Very useful: Guidelines for the development of impact models ("Wirkungsmodelle"). ✍️Written by Interface Politikstudien, 📢p…
0
4
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
7 months
RT @stefhaustein: I recently posted about our most recent open dataset ( and data paper ( w…
0
31
0
@hug_sven
Sven E. Hug
7 months
RT @AileenFyfe: Abstracts of research papers: who should write them? how and when should they be circulated? A revised and expanded version…
0
6
0