![Sven E. Hug Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1285864977501499392/KFhIXQ3y_x96.jpg)
Sven E. Hug
@hug_sven
Followers
1K
Following
14K
Statuses
2K
research evaluation | bibliometrics | peer review | science policy
Switzerland
Joined June 2017
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: New book surveying science of science from perspective of different disciplines
0
16
0
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: Small trial of funding via lottery finds null effects of winning on pubs, citations
0
9
0
RT @robysinatra: Based on data (not opinions), the works of Hopfield and Hinton #NobelPrize2024 1. Are physics 2.…
0
37
0
RT @robysinatra: Glad that #NobelPrize Physics caught up with recognizing interdisciplinary discoveries! We investigated the interdisciplin…
0
4
0
RT @c_est_lucy: So many things going on lately that I hadn't had the time to share this preprint, which I'm particularly proud of 🥳 Evaluat…
0
7
0
RT @ablatchjones: Early insight to a recent scoping review on the benefits and challenges of AI for research funding organisations https:…
0
1
0
RT @squazzoni: Here is a new #preprint on #openscience #opendata with @tonyR_H @klebel_t @federico_fb showing that more competitive #resear…
0
6
0
RT @FWFOpenAccess: Just published by @RoRInstitute: Gregory, Kathleen; Waltman, Ludo; Pinfield, Stephen (2024). Peer review in funding orga…
0
7
0
RT @JeroenBaas: @KevinBoyack @aarontay Something that strikes me in the response is “The concerns seem to be founded on fear (…) that the r…
0
1
0
RT @KevinBoyack: @JeroenBaas @aarontay Yes, unfortunate. And a misrepresentation as well. I don't think bibliometricians feel threatened. R…
0
3
0
RT @KevinBoyack: I'll side with Giovanni here, not only because his arguments are well reasoned (they are!), but also because if he hadn't…
0
5
0
RT @Swiss_SSC: 🔧Very useful: Guidelines for the development of impact models ("Wirkungsmodelle"). ✍️Written by Interface Politikstudien, 📢p…
0
4
0
RT @stefhaustein: I recently posted about our most recent open dataset ( and data paper ( w…
0
31
0
RT @AileenFyfe: Abstracts of research papers: who should write them? how and when should they be circulated? A revised and expanded version…
0
6
0