Pierre Poilievre has been nothing but a fecless sloganeering career politician. I have people actually telling me to unite for Pierre. "He's our best chance." BS. I've met Pierre, and I've supported him since his leadership bid. He's petrified to speak to anything remotely contentious out of fear of alienating a demographic. He is utterly disingenuous in virtually every regard. Though just like all of you. I made excuses for the guy. While he dressed up to pander to various immigrant communities, I made excuses. "He has to appeal to a super liberal electorate." I would say. It was after the Jordan Peterson interview that I simply couldn't advocate for him any longer. To my utter dismay, everyone seemed to love it. That's how deprived of substance we are from our public servants. An interview where he didn't specify any plan to actually change anything, and they avoided all of the contentious issues, and Canadians were all fired up for Pierre. If the man cared a modicum for the well-being of Canadians, if he cared for our freedom and prosperity, he would be advocating publicly for annexation. People can tell me it will never happen. People can call me a traitor or a dreamer. I do not care. I didn't come here to be popular. I came here to tell the truth as best as I can determine it. Pierre Poilievre is not the fighter we require. If he wins a majority government, he will still not be able to effect substantive change. Our unconstitutional monarchy and westminister parliamentary government is systemically undemocratic. We have an appointed Senate. 80 percent of our Senate is presently comprised of radical left Trudeau appointees. There's no practical way forward. The entire enterprise is irredeemably corrupted. Nothing short of radical reformation into a constitutional republic or annexation will suffice. The rot is too deep. I'm sorry, if you want to bet the farm on Pierre, that's fine. Though I'm going to continue screaming the truth with every breath I have.

🇺🇸 was built by free men who drafted a Constitution with which to defend themselves against those who seek to take away their freedom. 🇨🇦 was built by its ruling elites to govern over men and resources to be harnessed for their own purposes. Our roots are not the same. And little has changed.

I heard you are denying being part of the World Economic Forum. I am not Canadian but decided to scan for you all. In about 5 seconds found that your name WAS LISTED on their website. You had your own page actually. WAYBACK machine. Want me to find more guys?? @grantsabraham for PM of Canada.

Mexico sends ton of fentanyl into our country. Canada has seen a massive increase in fentanyl trafficking across its border. There are three ways of stopping this. The first is ask nicely, which we’ve done. It’s gone nowhere. Now we’re on to the consequences phase.

As a Canadian with 40 years' experience in military service, intel and various aspects of government, I believe the greatest threat to Canada: 1. Foreign infiltration by China, Muslim Brotherhood and Iran 2. Globalist, "progressive" politicians who believe in Canada as a post nationalist state 3. Corruption in government which has progressed to racketeering and looting of the treasury 4. The destruction of our economy 5. The destruction of our national institutions such as the RCMP, the Military, Elections Canada and Parliament etc etc

It's okay, most people are afraid of change. But fear not. Our lakes, and mountains, and forests will still be there. We will still have hockey, and beavers, and maple syrup. Gaining the US Constitution is the overhaul Canada needs to be a free & democratic society once again.

Remember when former CSIS intelligence officer, Michael Juneau-Katsuya, testified: "We can prove that every government from Mr. Mulroney to Mr. Trudeau has been compromised by the agents of Communist China" I guess the Foreign Interference Commissioner missed this...😂

@grantsabraham @MaximeBernier Hypocrisy is what allows to to deny conflation as an off-ramp, after having used it yourself as an on-ramp. If you want a deeper conversation here, I am quite ready to oblige you. I will let you start, presuming you are able.

You fired the first smear volley. I defended my boundaries. Popular vs populist

@grantsabraham @LovesCanada8 The David Yeos of this world are a problem faced by all political parties. Attempting to conflate the unethical behavior of a rogue candidate, who was later dropped, with official party policy is quite ridiculous.

When a debate lost turns personal to save face.

@grantsabraham Grant, popularism and populism are 2 different things. 1)Max could have had an easy seat by following what was popular- UN loyalty. Instead he stands for the people-populism. 2)The MRNa being safe and effective was elitist popularism. The Freedom Convoy was populist

@grantsabraham @LovesCanada8 Face it Grant, you are getting your ass handed to you in this debate. You might want to quit while you are behind. You are not going to like it much, if I really decide to take a round out of you.