![Gerda Kits Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/991424487198416896/8fpIekLx_x96.jpg)
Gerda Kits
@gerdakits
Followers
170
Following
2K
Statuses
481
Associate professor of economics, The King's University (views are my own). She/her. Settler in Treaty Six territory & Métis homeland.
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined October 2014
@demoormj I highly doubt he would have paid that extra $10,000 for a plane ticket if one had been available at that price, in which case the valuation is neither reasonable nor accurate.
0
0
0
RT @DaniParadis: @APTNNews flew over the Kearl project oilsands today. Today we are on the ground for a community meeting in Fort Chipewyan…
0
25
0
@DrAAlBahrani Thanks for this! Going to share with my (Canadian) intro students who have been asking about the situation.
1
0
0
@PhilTRoberts When I started teaching, a seasoned educ prof told me to have students do something different every ten minutes or so - switching between lecture, groupwork, independent writing, class discussion, etc. 80 min lectures are standard here and I find no break is needed if I do this.
0
0
1
@demoormj Yeah fully agree. I think Parkland has some stuff on the empirical side, by the way. But I don't have it at my fingertips.
0
0
0
@demoormj Yeah I think that’s the real question - I saw the same thread yesterday and was trying to figure out how a private, not for profit clinic would work - who owns it, how do the doctors get paid, how do the incentive structures work.
0
0
0
@demoormj I’m not sure that’s true even at the level of theory - there can be issues of asymmetric information when it comes to health care, meaning consumers may not be able to properly assess the quality of care they’re receiving.
0
0
0
RT @Indigenous_ca: 🚨Come learn about divestment with us! Join in the conversation with Ellen Gabrielle, Vanessa Gray, and Sleydo Molly Wic…
0
15
0
@joshualeeharris @demoormj I mean, I kind of admire how it can be so confidently wrong. Just mashing up totally unrelated things (in the architectonic critique one) in a way that sounds totally plausible even though it’s totally incorrect.
0
0
0