![D dd Profile](https://abs.twimg.com/sticky/default_profile_images/default_profile_x96.png)
D dd
@ddykdykdyk
Followers
145
Following
13K
Statuses
7K
Joined September 2021
@MilaLovesJoe The only people who don’t are “loonie libs” who see someone with a Trump hat. You know. The “tolerant ones”.
0
0
0
@ABC Democracy and elections are obviously so hard on Sen Murphy. Wow. What a complete lunatic
0
0
0
@danpfeiffer Like when biden tried to force me to pay other peoples student loan obligations? With out congressional approval? That kind of “no checks and balances? Did i miss your concern then?
0
0
0
@amyklobuchar Please scream louder. And shriller!! Calling people racist, sexist, homophobic etc etc has worked so well over these past few years. Double down on it!! Please!
0
0
0
@AesPolitics1 Sucks when people die because of Biden and the Dem’s DEI policies. Maybe in the future, we could try something like… I don’t know. Maybe hiring the most qualified people for the job? Naw…. That would never work. In the “all we see is skin color” loonie world of liberals
0
0
0
@bonchieredstate They voted for this. Trump shouldn’t “save” them from it. If they want change, they can vote for it themselves.
0
0
0
@ABC ABC news - damn - we learn in like 1st grade the difference between “immigrants”, and “illegal aliens”. Obviously you got special permission to move forward. Since clearly you have no clue of the difference. “Immigrants” are in absolutely no way afraid. Of any of htis crap
0
0
0
@ABC Beyond sad that our federal govt was contracting with companies and excluding white people from being able to participate. And even more sad, millions of Dims think it’s ok. As long as it’s discrimation against “the right skin people”.
0
0
0
Thx as always for the thoughtful explanation. That being said…. :). The filibuster for judicial nominees was “the way the founding fathers set it up” until 2014ish, when Sen Reid (D) decided it wasn’t convenient anymore. So he abolished it. We know the D’s will trash rules at their convenience. Thank GOD that Rs decided to do that for SCOTUS nominees as well, or Trump’s nominees would have all - every single one - been rejected. Is it time to change these rules now, since they seem to only hurt the R nominees. Every single time?
0
0
0
@redsteeze In FL, this means “you have to build to hurricane proof building codes so this doesn’t happen again”. In CA, this means “you have to give up your property to our liberal goals of equity and inclusion”. One is not like the other……
0
0
2
@epaleezeldin @EPA Un frickin believable. We must have had complete idiots in charge of our country this past 4 years. Wow. Thx for exposing their criminal decisions and spending.
0
0
0
@MarcACaputo Sadly, it’s gotten to where instead of “true unless proven false”, we have to assume most “news articles” (cough cough) are “false until proven true”. In completely unrelated news, trust in media is now below the shixxer……
0
0
0
@clarasophiadaly So it turns out this is a lie. From a “reporter” (cough cough). Damn. It’s gotten to where we just have to assume the media is lying, and then only believe their articles are correct once they have been vetted and proven true. Which too often ends up not being the case
1
0
0