Editing this was hard work but so worth it. 38 new essays on Schop’ from establish scholars and new voices. There were surprises - not least a pandemic - but the best was that my co-editor started off on the other side of the Atlantic and now he has the office opposite mine.
Wes Anderson’s next film should be set in Jena in 1796. Bill Murray as Goethe, Adrian Brody as Schiller, the Owen brothers as the Schlegel brothers - it basically casts itself.
On 23 March 1820, Schopenhauer gave a job talk on causality at Berlin University, during which he and Hegel argued about how to define ‘animal functions’. The zoologist Hinrich Lichtenstein intervened and sided with Schopenhauer. He got the job but never had more than 5 students.
New! (Something about the cover image suddenly seemed familiar, then I realised that this picture - ‘The Ruins of Holyrood Chapel’ (1824) by Louis Daguerre, of daguerreotype fame - hangs in the Walker Art Gallery in Liverpool. I’ve stood in front of it many a time.)
Jean Paul Sartre was the first person to decline the Nobel Prize.
In 1964, Sartre was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature, but made it known that he did not wish to accept the prize as he had always declined official honours.
More on Sartre’s refusal:
My promotion application has been approved and so from August I’ll be Associate Professor at
@PhilosWarwick
🥳 I owe thanks to lots of colleagues and students, but most of all I’m lucky to have had a succession of supportive heads of department in
@GuyLongworth
and
@annefabpeter
Goethe on critics: “They seem to harbour the illusion that if a man accomplishes something he is in their debt; that he is always a little behind with delivering what they really wanted—even though they had no idea, before they saw his work, that such a thing was even possible."
What did Schopenhauer learn about mental health from visiting asylums and speaking with their residents?
Find out in my new piece for
@psyche_the_mag
@aeonmag
My first lesson about academia - First day of first job, I showed up at 9am to report to my head of department, as per my letter from HR. Having no idea about this letter, he wasn’t there. When I emailed him, he said I didn’t need to be there either, unless of course I wanted to.
Yesterday I briefly met one of our young neighbours for the first time, who was looking for help getting her ball back. Today, this came through our door 🥲
The who/whom distinction is the worst sufferer of what I like to call the paradox of pedantry: to correct someone, you must have understood what they meant
Clothing sponsors for academics should be a thing. During the working week, we spend hours every day stood in front of dozens of fashion conscious young people. We’re basically unused billboards.
It has happened again. I went out for a pastry, I came back with a book (and a pastry). It’s not my fault if the bookshop and the bakery are on the same street.
Writing tip of the day. Listen up, academics!
Avoid using a verb and a noun when a verb alone is better.
provide an analysis = analyse
offer an interpretation = interpret
defend an argument = argue, etc
There is nothing that is not wonderful about books. They’re inexpensive, they last a lifetime, they’re infinitely reusable, infinitely rich, they make you more interesting whenever you read one, whether you think it’s good or not. I know you know this, but I wanted to remind you.
“Fichte is the father of fake philosophy, the dishonest method that tries to fool those who are eager to learn by using ambiguous language and incomprehensible speech along with sophisms and a haughty, imposing tone” (Schopenhauer). Can’t wait!
#FoundInOxfam
Today I learned that in August 1850, Schopenhauer sat for the same photographer, Hermann Hartmann, who took this iconic picture of Nietzsche in 1875. The technology was less developed back then, and Schopenhauer didn’t like the photograph, so he gave it away to his housekeeper.