In my last article for @TDataScience I show how #researchers can improve their analysis of objects or cell counts with lots of zeros in #rstats with #brms. An example based on #brain cells. #DataScientist @PhDVoice #phdlife #datavis

@TheRayMyers I have a record of 22-23 PE for AMD. Am I reading the chart in the wrong way?

@PredatoryReport I hope they suggest that terminating scientific journals is the most effective way to improve the scientific culture.

@TheRayMyers In Poland, $APR and $SPR are attractive companies to analyze.

@OxygenIvan @slavov_n Definitively

@NTFabiano Like all those papers saying "significant difference" thinking that they are responding to scientific questions. All of those had passed "rigorous" peer reviews.

@NTFabiano It is incredible how these companies have illegally taken control of scientific publishing and advancement. We can use open platforms with open peer review, where we upload articles backed up by raw data and reproducible workflows.

@Dr_5GH I have an example in this blog post with zero- inflated distributions.

@Dr_5GH It is common when you work with inflated, Poisson or gamma distributions. Also, when you perform certain bootstrapping approaches with skewed data. In those cases, asymmetric uncertainty measurements are more precise than symmetrical ones.

@TheRayMyers It reveals crypo is just the biggest Ponzi scheme in history.

@OxygenIvan I placed my name at the end. Please check. Was it the intended?

@OxygenIvan @MicrobiomDigest @lonnibesancon @Thatsregrettab1 @FauxSci If you want us to put our names below the text, we need access to edit.

@OxygenIvan I asked edit access because I am just able to view the document

Best idea I have seen in 2025 to improve the scientific endeavor #OpenScience

@mbeisen @addictedtoigno1 I support this notion...

@lonnibesancon @OxygenIvan @MicrobiomDigest @Thatsregrettab1 @FauxSci Definitively. Docs is great

@OxygenIvan Amazing

Greate opportunity to discuss about fraudulent science.