Predatory Journals
@PredatoryReport
Followers
4K
Following
1K
Statuses
1K
The Predatory Journals List. Also at ๐ฆ https://t.co/HJvXmX9air
Global
Joined January 2022
We have created our @Patreon profile. If you would like to help us maintain our website, please feel free to become a ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. Don't worry, all of our content will remain freely available forever. ๐ ๐ฃ
0
1
5
@balrajshukla Certainly predatory. It does not clearly show the value of the APC for this journal, but in other journals by ACCScience they charge a submission withdrawal fee of 30%. No affiliation with DOAJ or COPE. ๐
0
0
1
@realjoonha @ElsevierConnect You increase the citation count for the parent journal by citing articles published in it.
0
0
0
@MarkvLoosdrecht @Spottingthespot @SciTotEnv @Uni_Wuppertal @ElsevierConnect Yes, they reject your article and already suggest the "partner" journal.
๐จ New #Predatory practice: ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ ๐ถ๐น๐น 1โฃ Create several Open Access "partner" journals 2โฃ Induce authors to transfer their submissions to these "partners" 3โฃ Increase main journal citations through these "partners" 4โฃ Earn a lot of #APC by @ElsevierConnect
0
0
2
RT @PredatoryReport: ๐คฏ Over 8,000 highly cited scientists have at least one retraction! Database analysis reveals these researchers also haโฆ
0
2
0
RT @maoviedogarcia: #MiniReviewMill 23 #FakeReview #CoerciveCitation @qeios Reviewers Muhammad Awais @Air_University ๐ต๐ฐ Taimoor Salahuddโฆ
0
5
0
RT @Spottingthespot: The highly corrupt journal @SciTotEnv has launched 3 sister journals recently to continue their #papermill #fraud. Theโฆ
0
9
0
RT @PredatoryReport: New study reveals that around 20,000 scientists may be publishing an "implausibly high" number of papers, raising concโฆ
0
20
0
RT @maoviedogarcia: #MiniReviewMill 24 #FakeReview #CoerciveCitation @qeios Reviewers ๐นMehreen Fiza @AWKUMofficial ๐ต๐ฐ โก๏ธ21 own articlesโฆ
0
1
0
New study reveals that around 20,000 scientists may be publishing an "implausibly high" number of papers, raising concerns about academic integrity and the pressure to prioritize quantity over quality. #AcademicPublishing #ResearchIntegrity #sciencenews
0
20
32
RT @PredatoryReport: ๐จ Research shows that scientists with retracted publications tend to be younger, have higher self-citation rates, andโฆ
0
12
0
๐คฏ Over 8,000 highly cited scientists have at least one retraction! Database analysis reveals these researchers also had higher self-citation rates. What does this mean for the reliability of scientific literature? #Retraction #Science ๐จ
0
2
7
