dagarfield Profile Banner
David Garfield (@dagarfield@mstdn.social and post) Profile
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)

@dagarfield

Followers
2K
Following
6K
Statuses
5K

Computational biology, regeneration, aging, and evolution at gRED (Genentech). The views expressed here are most definitely my own.

San Francisco, CA
Joined June 2016
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
0
0
1
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@Spikels @ATabarrok Can you define unproductive?
0
0
3
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@realDirge14 @pmwilker @NIH Do you honestly think this administration is going to take these savings and put them back into people or increase science funding?
2
0
0
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@pmwilker @realDirge14 @NIH Yeah, it might need reform. But this is also a system with funding levels that haven't been adjusted for inflation in > 25 years and this just gutted the whole thing.
1
0
0
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@pmwilker @NIH Except its also negotiated in advance. This may not be the right way to do it, but just pulling the funding in one go will force labs to shut down. It will stop trials. It will literally kill people, slow down innovation, and drive scientists to other countries.
2
0
5
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
I have no doubt at all that reforms to overhead and the grant awards process needs reform. But this is *not the way to do it*. This is how you derail a train that has delivered growth and innovation to the US far beyond the money we've put in.
@NIH
NIH
1 day
Last year, $9B of the $35B that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) granted for research was used for administrative overhead, what is known as “indirect costs.” Today, NIH lowered the maximum indirect cost rate research institutions can charge the government to 15%, above what many major foundations allow and much lower than the 60%+ that some institutions charge the government today. This change will save more than $4B a year effective immediately.
Tweet media one
1
7
12
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@phuturize @NIH You need to pay to keep the lights on to do the research, and this requires some overhead. This has become bloated overtime, but also cutting it this way will basically shut down medical research in the US at all but the wealthiest universities.
0
0
12
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@mbeisen Yeah, I had both of those same thoughts plus the realization that probably contrary to his intentions, this is really, really going to hit smaller public schools in redstates. Also UCSF is probably freaking out right now.....
0
1
6
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@Prof_HowardHall @NIH Just NIH. It is an overhead paid to institutions *just* for the competitively awarded NIH grants.
0
0
0
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@janecoaston And isn't he, like, 25? This is not a child. He's an inexperienced but actual adult. You even get a rental car discount at that age.
0
0
0
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@WadeMiller_USMC @jonfavs @JDVance No, good management would be shutting up about it because its someone else's call. When the VP of the US weighs in, that is meddling in the manager decision process.
0
0
0
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@JDVance OMG YOU ARE THE GOVERNMENT. Hire him back if you want.
0
0
0
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
1 day
@atrupar I hate Trump, but I have to admit that's a pretty good come back on the spot.
0
0
1
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
2 days
@justin_hart I think it would feel more like scrutinize if it wasn't just all cut.
0
0
0
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
2 days
@Hongbo919Liu @KSusztak I cannot say enough really just how impressed I am by this presentation of material. Solid, robust, easy to read. Deeply accessible.
0
0
1
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
2 days
@RCownie @SashaGusevPosts So the interpretation here is that this is basically an extension of the attacks on anything that looks vaguely DEI? (this seems plausible, esp. if all you know of NSF is a search for "broader impacts")
0
0
0
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
2 days
@pastramimachine @SashaGusevPosts I have some access to this world via college connections, and this is my take at least for the more well meaning (if wrong) subset. I work in a great private sector research firm. I don't get to play with Gila Monster Venom.
0
0
1
@dagarfield
David Garfield (@[email protected] and post)
2 days
@KSusztak @ScienceMagazine @Hongbo919Liu this is really a master class in how to do this. Well done.
0
0
2