Colin Fraser
@colin_fraser
Followers
9K
Following
8K
Media
2K
Statuses
15K
The insane irony of this is that each one of these failed multiplications requires performing trillions of successful multiplications.
Is OpenAI's o1 a good calculator? We tested it on up to 20x20 multiplicationâo1 solves up to 9x9 multiplication with decent accuracy, while gpt-4o struggles beyond 4x4. For context, this task is solvable by a small LM using implicit CoT with stepwise internalization. 1/4
116
1K
20K
this is so fucking lazy, it literally just forwards your text directly to ChatGPT from the client side with a little note that says "act like Alan Turing" lol.
Genius Group welcomes new Chief AI Officer, Alan Turing - resurrected after 70 years. I believe $GNS is the 1st US public listed company to appoint an #AI to its C-Suite (Although @elonmusk at @Tesla may be part-AI already). Will all companies have AIs on their Board & Exec
53
350
7K
the very first note is "commit a crime".
some of my notes from the Art of Hiring event earlier today: . @rabois .- don't hire anyone over the age of 30 .- recruiters are probably ineffective but still important b/c they drive hiring momentum.- it takes 3-30 mins to evaluate someone (probably 3 though).- undiscovered
24
261
5K
I donât think itâs a hedonic treadmill type thing. Itâs more like, it just actually sucks. Itâs amazing, but it doesnât do anything useful enough to be worth anything. The value proposition has always been that the useful version of it is just around the corner.
Iâm amazed at how humanity can adapt to technology. In just 2 years, ChatGPT went from blowing everyoneâs mind to everyone waiting for the next update.
36
153
3K
No. People thought CSI computers could do infinite zoom+enhance in 2005. People thought Furbys were learning to speak by listening to their children in 1998. Everything AI can supposedly do now itâs been able to do better in the public imagination for many many decades.
If you sent an AI generated image or a Claude transcript to 5y ago people would call it witchcraft. They would not believe you. I feel insane when people act performatively unimpressed by these things.
15
243
3K
I like the completely arbitrary cutout for math, just to make entirely clear that no principle underlies this.
@littmath One of my doctoral mentors used to say if you can't explain to an intelligent layperson why your research is worth doing, it probably isn't worth doing. He called it the "Why should we care?" question. Of course, math may be different in this respect.
11
86
3K
Map/territory confusion is an epidemic.
one of the most euphoric discoveries in my life was the realization that language is a type of linear algebra (Word Embeddings). every dog is a vector in the "dog" vector space where each of the N components of the vector is a measurable value: hair color, weight, geometry, etc
32
111
2K
@the_yanco I disagree
if this question doesn't sound nonsensical to you then I am afraid you may be the one who misunderstands growth rates.
3
2
2K
âSay to your LLM the followingâ Iâm starting to think this guy might not actually be that smart about this stuff
Eric Schmidt, asking not to be quoted, told budding entrepreneurs at Stanford to steal content in order to build startups quickly, and have lawyers âclean the mess upâ later. This is unfortunately advice lots of VCs give aspiring founders. They just usually donât say it
12
123
2K
Itâs certainly true that a major part of the appeal of these things for a lot of people is that they can make you feel like youâre getting a PhD.
I spend a significant amount of my free time reading books with ChatGPT / Claude as a companion and I feel like Iâm getting a PhD for $20 / month.
21
52
1K
@lastpositivist All it does is write a little document that looks similar to documents in its training data for some particular notion of similarity. The documents it tries to emulate are transcripts of a helpful chatbot answering questions for its human interlocutor. This does resemble that.
1
4
1K
@hdevalence @mycoliza I don't know exactly what happens in my head but I'm sure it's not trillions of accurate floating point multiplications.
11
6
1K
@toon_alfrink Calm down, you can just look at the side of the picture and see what the numbers are.
2
3
1K