![Thomas Chow π± Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1625402250083581953/nyxde5xF_x96.jpg)
Thomas Chow π±
@chinaesq
Followers
1K
Following
3K
Statuses
3K
Pubco tech exec + director. @Chia_Project, @PermutoCapital, @silicondotnet, BiBoLabs, @Cryptsonic. Ex @PubMatic, @Snapchat, @VDX_tv, @Vindicia, @TechSoup.
South San Francisco, CA
Joined October 2009
Sigh, crypto people on X... π I don't have a dog in this fight other than to care about the quality of tech. From that POV, why did the "inferior" one fix a known consensus bug... and have the entire chain back to the genesis block? And why didn't the OG remedy these? π€·ββοΈ
Imagine being a fork of XRPL, always riding on the coattails of the original. And yet, always inferior in market cap, adoption, and all metrics. Imagine that being your claim to fame. Always inferior, always the copy of the original.
0
6
12
RT @milesjennings: Just spent an incredible week in DC and I'm more optimistic than I've ever been that crypto is going to get regulatory cβ¦
0
21
0
@primdigital @SlowestTimelord @hoffmang I believe that a lot of tradfi wants to be involved in crypto eventually, so they have to signal willingness to test and dabble in it without serious commitment. That's okay but it really is more marketing than substance at this point.
1
5
17
@SriniSurasani @zooko Thank you! Interesting but I'm not convinced it'll be a security upgrade. Sustainability and token price I understand why, but @zooko should be talking to @bramcohen about why PoST if you want security AND sustainability...
0
1
3
I'll also say that the point of PoW is that longest chain wins. If an 'attacker' chain really had 51%+ of the hashing power going forward on an 'attack', then the social convention to 'take back the chain' is actually the hack/attack on the chain. Because the 'attacker' chain isn't an attacker--it's the chain. A fully automated consensus (rather than "partially automated" one, such as described by Vitalik at Stanford in Aug 22) is a feature, not a bug.
0
0
1