![Brig Jack D Ripper Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1798358145473052672/Oot5Z7PW_x96.jpg)
Brig Jack D Ripper
@bhootnath
Followers
42K
Following
14K
Statuses
128K
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the war room! nothing tweeted or RT is financial advice.
MAGAland
Joined November 2008
RT @AmanHasNoName_2: Gentle reminder that none of the politicians got this angry when you were breathing poison in the name of Delhi air.…
0
853
0
RT @hvgoenka: Our Country is a paradise- everything is perfect. No inflation, no unemployment, no global tensions. The real issues? Nehru,…
0
2K
0
RT @kamleshksingh: Mercilessly slash bureaucracy, simplify licensing rules, enforce order. That's all it takes to take a country out of the…
0
565
0
RT @gappullback: We are fucked. As much as you like Modi, this government is turning into a socialist hellhole with random taxes and ladli…
0
2K
0
Then why not give a GST offset for the salaried class? Why make them studs (engineers will understand this joke)?
Ok, let me take a shot at explaining why a single GST rate is a terrible idea for India - both in terms of equity and politics. TLDR: As long as income tax evasion is rampant, the govts will rely disproportionately on GST, a consumption tax. And hence, a single rate will shift the tax burden from the rich to the poor The total taxes extracted by the govt (centre + states) is in the range of 55T (all figures are ballpark, of the top of my head) - this is corporate/income taxes, GST, stamp duties, fuel and alcohol taxes etc. Taxes are either based on consumption (indirect) or on income (direct). There are multiple permutations and combinations in which the govts can extract these taxes from households/corporates. But ultimately they need to get their pound of flesh, ie, 55T. Now the peculiar thing about India is that roughly 2/3 of the taxes come from consumption and the remaining 1/3 from direct taxes. Why is this peculiar? Because in other major economies, the ratio is the opposite. And that makes sense - you want to extract more money from people earning high income. In a consumption tax heavy system with a single rate, the poor end up paying a higher proportion of their income as taxes (because their savings are lower). The obvious reason that we have a low direct tax/GDP ratio is because of rampant tax evasion. The above factors informs the idea behind multi-rate GST. One, you want to ensure that the rich pay a proportionately higher share to the exchequer. Two, those who evade direct taxes at least end up paying some taxes due to their consumption. Now let's look at the GST numbers. Total collection is about ₹20T. Of this nearly 15% comes from auto sales alone. I would guess that car sales account for more than half of that and bike sales the rest. What happens if we theoretically move to a single rate of, say 14%. The taxes from auto sales drop down by, say ₹1.5T. Thats a sizeable benefit to the top 10% (car buyers) and top 50% (bike buyers) households. But this ₹1.5 revenue loss gets offset by higher rates on hitherto low/zero tax goods which are consumed by everyone including the bottom 50%. IOW, it's a shift in tax burden from the rich to the poor. So what is the way forward? It is to steadily expand the direct tax base and simultaneously moderate the average tax rate on GST. As GST becomes a smaller and smaller part of the overall tax pie, one can look at reducing tax slabs and ultimately make it a 2-3 rate structure.
2
2
3
RT @saikirankannan: I am astonished that there are still such high expectations for a govt that seems completely unresponsive to the concer…
0
3
0
RT @The_Nehru: Today I ordered Nirmala to impose GST on popcorn. Don’t worry Narendra, I will cover for you 🥰
0
3K
0
RT @The_Nehru: Today morning while having coffee at the restaurant, I ordered Nirmala to increase the GST rates of coffee as follows: Blac…
0
1K
0
RT @thetoddjacob: 1896: At a Manhattan society party, Nikola Tesla meets an Indian mystic. Their conversation would challenge physics... d…
0
4K
0
RT @mityasmusin: In 1993, IBM lost $8.2 BILLION––the most in US corporate history. Their stock crashed 75% and everyone thought they were…
0
297
0