Some people can think for themselves, and can do it well! That's perhaps why
@erikphoel
ended up leaving academia and also why a hundred and so prominent academics can make a fool of themselves:
THE STAIRWAY TO TRANSHUMANIST HEAVEN:
A pseudo-religion dressed up as technoscience promises human transcendence at the cost of extinction -- my review of Ray Kurzweil's new book:
We are delighted to have
@Liad_Mudrik
giving a special session at our THEORIES OF CONSCIOUSNESS online series entitled "Comparing and Testing Neuroscientific Theories of Consciousness". Check it out (there's more)!
Every gene U take
Every plot U make
Every cause U claim
Every game U play
I'll be funding U.
Every single day
Every vial U shake
Every thought U flake
Every day U waste
I'll be funding U.
Oh, can't U see
Science belongs to me?
How my poor brain aches
...
reviewing a grant application: the "deliverables" are fucking risible ("N research manuscripts") and the "outcome indicators" are fucking absurd ("X citations in Y years"). Does anybody believe this bullshit? Why do we play along? This falsity is a travesty that drains our minds.
(1) Are PhD Students students? (or cheap workforce...) (2) Are Principal Investigators investigators? (or fund raisers...) (3) Are Journal Editors editors? (or orthodoxy gatekeepers...)
"CAUSALITY is the killer test for science." Well, physics had gone deeper: the apple falls "because" of SYMMETRY reasons. Yet, biology, producing hardly no novel theoretical ideas for 100y, has surrendered to vague weak notions of mechanism & information.
"What happens with the mind when the brain dies?" Recent paper on my own NDE experience + some thoughts on the nature of the mind-brain relationship (if you work on the life & mind sciences and have had one NDE or similar, please contact me privately):
How cool that
@AnnaCiaunica
is also presenting at our THEORIES OF CONSCIOUSNESS online series on "The bodily roots of conscious experiences in early life". You can register here:
@yoginho
@eLife
Indeed, Yogi! "Theoretical physics is science. Theoretical biology isn't." -- As a theoretical physicist turned neuro-biologist, I encounter this (explicitly or implicitly) all the time...
Join me online March 29-31 for the Metaphysics and the Matter with Things conference with Iain McGilchrist from the Center for Process Studies & the California Institute of Integral Studies! Learn more & get tickets here:
TSC2023 participants voting for "the most convincing solution to the problem of consciousness" (note: science the consensus of experts, but not democratic ;):
The real problem of consciousness is “how the brain as a perceptual object within consciousness relates to the brain as part of the embodied conditions for consciousness”:
For me, being a physicist turned neuroscientist, listening to the brilliance of thought and speech of
@sfiscience
's David Krakauer is a double treat because it really feels like John (
@blamlab
) talking about complexity science. Enjoy:
HISTORIA VIVA ("Living History"): próximo evento el 1 de Junio en el
@NeuroAlc
, con las ponencias del Prof. Puelles y del Prof. Belmonte. La historia de la neurociencia española contada en primera persona.
@Historia_SENC
@FENSorg
And very intrigued to learn from
@mjdramstead
about "What (if anything) does the free energy principle teach us about consciousness?", also at our THEORIES OF CONSCIOUSNESS online series:
"Even scientists who are critical of the emphasis on connectomics happily use the wiring diagram metaphor (e.g., Barack and Krakauer, 2021; Gomez-Marin, 2021)" 🙄🙃 A Brief History of Wires in the Brain: 👍
@matthewcobb
@blamlab
Next Tuesday at 7pm (Spain time) at
@neuromatch
watch our great
@mrzl29
convert
@DeepLabCut
into an artificial magic spectator to study human cognition. Tracking invisible coins (scoremaps):
@KordingLab
Ultimately, the problem is what Whitehead called "the fallacy of misplaced concreteness" -- we end up taking spherical cows (markov blankets, etc) as concrete reality. Abstractions are great until you forget they are abstractions.
Can I sell a Nature Neuroscience paper of mine as a Non-Fungible Token..? Academic science is in self-distruction mode, and some seem to enjoy from the captain control room as we (all) sink.
(1/2) MAKING LIFE & MIND AS CLEAR AS POSSIBLE, BUT NOT CLEARER: "Neuroscience needs theory. Ideas without data are blind & yet mechanisms without concepts are empty. Friston's free energy principle paradigmatically illustrates the power and pitfalls of current theoretical bio.."
(1/2) by
@erikphoel
: "being a successful professor now-a-days means not just crafting your research so it will receive big governmental grants, but also being involved with the student body, doing extracurricular activities, volunteering, taking on a bunch of busywork like..."
Today
@dr_mcgilchrist
and I finished the recording of the last chapter of The Matter With Things -- what a delightful journey across more than a thousand pages that shall help heal the world and ourselves...