UFC boss Dana White goes OFF on the Australian Media “You have the biggest pussies I’ve ever seen in the media in my life,” he said Dana White is absolutely right

The politicians who voted for the Hate Speech Bill didn’t do it to stop violent extremism or any of the other bs being thrown around to justify crushing free speech. Violent threats and incitement were already illegal. The real purpose of the bill is simple: Containment There is a growing right-wing movement spreading across the West, and it has finally reached Australia. Let's call it the New Australian Right. The most moderate members of this movement make Peter Dutton look like a left-wing progressive. They oppose mass migration. They reject the obsession with GDP and other economic metrics that make them feel like nothing more than random economic output generators in the eyes of establishment politicians—politicians they correctly believe view them with contempt. They are broadly pro-life, they don’t buy into climate alarmism, and they do not care about the policies pushed by the major parties. Most importantly, they cannot be controlled. Some may vote for Dutton in the next election, and he will likely become Prime Minister. Their vote is purely a rejection of Albo, not an endorsement of the Liberal Party. Many are not yet politically aware enough to break away from the two-party system, but that is changing. This movement isn’t fully organised yet—but it will be. Mainstream politicians know this. They are scared. That’s why all of the mainstream politicians believe this new movement must be stopped now, before it builds the momentum to truly challenge the political establishment. Think about everything the bill will stop the New Australian Right from building momentum on: Stopping Mass migration and cultural decline. Pro-Life sentiments and promoting the nuclear family. Promoting national sovereignty and cultural identity. Opposing the LGBT agenda. All of these issues can now be silenced by left-wing bureaucrats and activists, who will weaponise a deliberately flawed law to shut down opposition. The bill hands the courts the power to imprison people, not for inciting violence, but simply for being "reckless" with words. Remember: Under the bill, INTENT NO LONGER MATTERS. Authorities no longer have to prove that someone meant to incite hostility or fear—only that their words MIGHT have that effect. The recklessness standard means that if a court decides you should have known your statement could be offensive or cause distress to a protected group, you are guilty of hate speech and you can face imprisonment for up to 7 years in some cases. Strict liability in parts of the bill goes even further—making intent completely irrelevant. If someone from a protected group merely claims to feel threatened, that alone is enough for a conviction. This is all part of a deliberate strategy to place as many barriers as possible in the way of a true right-wing resurgence in Australia. This bill is not about stopping Nazis. It is not about fighting extremism. It is not about preventing Islamic terrorists from incitement. We already have strict laws to tackle these issues and have for years. This is about containment—plain and simple. The political class knows that the New Australian Right is coming, and they are terrified of what it represents. It represents a movement that cannot be controlled, that rejects establishment narratives, that does not care about being called names, and that is growing in strength as the country declines. Containment will not work. Unlike previous generations of conservatives who played within the system, the new right is smarter, more resilient, and used to the establishment’s tactics. The establishment thinks they can legislate away dissent, but they are only accelerating change As long as Australia continues to decline—economically, socially, and culturally—the movement they fear will only grow stronger. No hate speech law will be able to stop it. @CitizenGO_AU

@lesli97372 I bet you look a lot like yours.