@DesertByrda @SubstancePeter @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 Trump’s EO will almost certainly not last. The clause is very explicit that anyone born in the jurisdiction of the U.S federal government is a citizen. It was struck down ironically by a conservative judge.

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 It's funny how you pretend that the Supreme Court has magically never reviewed the 14th amendment and citizenship clause (spoiler; they have, you racists lost every time)

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 he couldn't answer a basic question. says everything about his political stance.

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 People born in the United States, by default, are in the United States legally as they are U.S citizens

RT @BernieSanders: Yes. We have a major constitutional crisis. Americans did not fight and die to protect democracy so that the richest ma…

RT @Liz_Cheney: .@JDVance -If you believe any of the multiple federal courts that have ruled against you so far are exceeding their statuto…

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 Really? Name me 1 SCOTUS or court case that rules in favor of abolishing birthright citizenship Oh wait? You can't. Because it doesn't exist.

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 its always been interpreted "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" = "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" "Every law is worth re-examining" just because racist MAGA folks don't like brown people becoming Americans doesn't mean you throw out the Constitution buddy.

@DesertByrda @SubstancePeter @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 a person born in the United States cannot be a foreigner or an alien. That quite literally goes against what a "foreigner" and an "alien" is.

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 Really? It’s weird because everyone was in favor of birthright citizenship Didn’t seem to be a complex topic at all.

@DesertByrda @SubstancePeter @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 Why do Trump supporters blatantly lie? It’s held the same judicial precedent since the 1880s And there’s no “original intent” to be found.. it’s very clear if you actually bother reading the Constitution…

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 no lmao. Trump’s EO won’t last. It’s very painfully clear that MAGA doesn’t care about the constitution. this is purely judicial activism.

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 Yet.. no one question birthright citizenship back then… funny how that works….

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 So Americans born to illegal immigrants wasn’t a thing from 1880-2024 ?? lmao.

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 So you’re seriously arguing that conservative and liberal SCOTUS courts have magically ignored this “dividing issue” since the 1880s yet now is the time to settle the question? really dude? this is the best you could come up with against birthright citizenship?

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 No. Lmao. No genuine conservative/liberal scholar is questioning the 14th amendment. Only dumbass MAGA folks are because they’re judicial activists who want to throw out 130 years of judicial precedent. The EO was blocked by a Reagan judge.

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 You haven’t answered the question… Where is foreign allegiance mentioned in the clause? If it’s not mentioned. It’s not a part of the clause. This isn’t a hot take my dude.

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 foreign allegiance is never mentioned once in the clause. have you ever read the 14th amendment?

@SubstancePeter @DesertByrda @beatmastermatt @DemonSnake18 Plessy v. Ferguson has never been officially overturned by SCOTUS